Christian R. Meixner1, Sebastian Schmitter2,3, Jürgen Herrler4, Arnd Dörfler4, Michael Uder1, and Armin M. Nagel1,3
1Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany, 2Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig und Berlin, Germany, 3Division of Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, 4Institute of Neuro-Radiology, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
Synopsis
Pseudo-continuous arterial spin
labeling (pcASL) at 7T suffers from insufficient B1+-amplitudes
and specific absorption rate (SAR) constraints. Even with B1+
phase-only or phase/amplitude shimming for the labeling the resulting inversion
is suboptimal. In this work, we performed Bloch simulations to examine the
impact of thicker pcASL labeling slices by adjusting the slice-selective
gradient of a B1+-shimmed labeling train exploiting Variable-Rate
Selective Excitation. The findings were evaluated experimentally in 5 healthy
volunteers. Using lower slice-selective gradients and subsequently longer
exposure of the spins to the pcASL labeling train, the perfusion images improved
according to gray matter temporal signal-to-noise ratio by 35%.
Introduction:
Arterial spin labeling (ASL) in ultra-high
field MRI benefits from prolonged T1-times and higher signal-to-noise ratio.1 However, at 7 Tesla, the recommended method for ASL2,
pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (pcASL), suffers from specific
absorption rate (SAR) constraints and insufficient B1+ amplitudes
for labeling. To reduce SAR, Variable-Rate Selective Excitation (VERSE) pulses promise
great advantage for the labeling/control scheme3,4.
To overcome B1+ inhomogeneity and B1+ inefficiency for labeling pulses, B1+ phase-only
shimming5 as well as phase/amplitude shimming was introduced4. However, this still leads to suboptimal inversion amplitudes4. Thicker labeling slices and subsequently lower maximum gradients could
improve labeling efficiency, even under suboptimal B1+ constraints, due to longer exposure of the spins to the pcASL labeling train.
In this work, we
simulated the impact of different slice-selective gradients of the pcASL
labeling train by Bloch simulations and validated the results experimentally.Methods:
Bloch simulations were performed
for the below described labeling train using different B1+ amplitudes (0.8:0.1:3.6µT), different slice-selective gradients strengths (Gmax=2.8:0.7:7.0mT/m)
and a mean velocity of 40cm/s. The average gradient strength was kept constant to
a proposed ratio6
of
$$$\frac{G_{ave}}{G_{max}}=\frac{1}{7}$$$
.
The simulation results were validated
on a 7T MR system (MAGNETOM Terra, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany)
using a 32-channel Rx/8Tx head-coil (Nova Medical, Wilmington, Massachusetts,
USA) and carried out in accordance with the institutional guidelines and with
approval of the local ethics committee (Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg,
Germany). An unbalanced pCASL labeling scheme (TPulse=500μs, TGap=1200μs)
was modified by using VERSE pulses7
(50% amplitude reduction, GVERSE,max = 10mT/m). Further, a hybrid B1+ phase shim was applied that trades B1+ homogeneity and transmit efficiency,
based on acquired relative B1+ maps8. To visualize the main feeding arteries in the V3 segment, TOF images
were acquired (compare Figure 1,
Figure
2).
For the hybrid B1+ phase shim, the cost function
$$$cost=\left(1-\lambda\right)\cdot CoV^{2} + \lambda\cdot\eta^{2}$$$
was minimized (weight λ=0.3), with coefficient
of variation
$$$ CoV=\frac{std\left(\left|\sum_{c=1}^C B_{1,c}^{+}(r)\right|\right)}{mean\left(\left|\sum_{c=1}^C B_{1,c}^{+}(r)\right|\right)} $$$
and effiency
$$$ \eta = mean\left(\frac{\left|\sum_{c=1}^C B_{1,c}^{+}(r)\right|}{\sum_{c=1}^C \left|B_{1,c}^{+}(r)\right|}\right) $$$ For
the readout a 2D echo planar imaging (EPI) sequence was used with following parameters:
resolution=2×2×4mm3, 15 slices, PAT=2, TE=15ms, flip angle=90°,
TR=6600-8500ms (depending on SAR). In total 5
subjects (mean age: 25.6±2.1years) were measured with the optimized slice-selective
gradient, according to the Bloch simulation and compared to a thin labeling
slice (high slice-selective gradient) as suggested by Alsop et al.2.
The gradient amplitude was restricted by VERSE and set to 7mT/m. Additional, a magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo9 was acquired to segment gray matter, white matter and cerebrospinal
fluid. The pcASL images underwent postprocessing using SPM12 (Wellcome Trust
Centre for Neuroimaging)10
as well as distortion correction11. All pcASL measurements were performed twice (each 37 repetitions) and
the mean tSNR in gray matter was calculated for evaluation.Results:
The simulation of suboptimal B1+
amplitudes shows, that lower slice-selective gradients lead to a higher
labeling efficiency (Figure 3a).
However, with lower slice-selective gradients the labeling slice thickness
increases (Figure 3b).
Since at pcASL, the blood should pass through the labeling slice
perpendicularly - and the labeling was applied in the V3 segment - it is
restricted by the distance between the bends of the vessels (Figure 2).
Therefore, it was adjusted individually for the measured subjects (slice
thickness limit was set to the full width at log(2) of the normalized
magnetization). Figure 4
shows the tSNR of both measurements for all subjects including the individual
slice-selective gradient. The mean tSNR over all subjects for the 7mT/m slice-selective
gradient was 0.43±0.06 and for the individual adjusted gradient 0.58±0.13,
resulting in an average tSNR gain of 35%. An examplary result of the
measurements is given in Figure 5.
The red arrow marks higher perfusion signal in the individual adjusted sequence
compared to 7mT/m.Discussion and Conclusion:
The labeling efficiency and
therefore the tSNR of the measurements was improved by individual gradient
adjustments as addition to B1+ shimming. Nevertheless,
due to the restriction of the labeling thickness, because of individual
anatomical structure, it was not possible to acquire the optimized slice-selective
gradient, according to the Bloch simulation. However, positioning the labeling
below the V3 segment is not feasible due to the restricted coil coverage.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Teeuwisse, W. M., Webb, A. &
Osch, J. P. Arterial Spin Labeling at Ultra-High Field: All That Glittersis Not
Gold. IMA 20, 62-70 (2010).
2. Alsop, D. C. et al. Recommended implementation of
arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: A consensus of
the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in
dementia. Magn Reson Med 73, 102-116, doi:10.1002/mrm.25197
(2015).
3.
Boland
M, Stirnberg R, Pracht ED, Stöcker T. Robust and
SAR-efficient whole-brain pseudo-continuous ASL at 7T. In Proceedings of the 27th
Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Montreal, Canada, 2019.
4. Tong, Y.,
Jezzard, P., Okell, T. W. & Clarke, W. T. Improving PCASL at ultra-high
field using a VERSE-guided parallel transmission strategy. Magn Reson Med, doi:10.1002/mrm.28173 (2020).
5. Li X, W. D., Wu
X, Van de Moortele PF, Ugurbil K, Metzger GJ. In Proceedings of the 26th
Annual Meeting of ISMRM,Paris, France, 2018.
6. Zhao, L.,
Vidorreta, M., Soman, S., Detre, J. A. & Alsop, D. C. Improving the
robustness of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling to off-resonance and
pulsatile flow velocity. Magn Reson Med
78, 1342-1351, doi:10.1002/mrm.26513
(2017).
7. Schmitter, S. et al. Contrast enhancement in TOF
cerebral angiography at 7 T using saturation and MT pulses under SAR
constraints: impact of VERSE and sparse pulses. Magn Reson Med 68,
188-197, doi:10.1002/mrm.23226 (2012).
8. Fautz
HP, Vogel M, Gross P, Kerr A, Zhu Y. B1 mapping of coil arrays for parallel
transmission. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of ISMRM,
Toronto, Canada, 2008.
9. Mugler, J. P.,
3rd & Brookeman, J. R. Rapid three-dimensional T1-weighted MR imaging with
the MP-RAGE sequence. J Magn Reson
Imaging 1, 561-567,
doi:10.1002/jmri.1880010509 (1991).
10. Wang, Z. et al. Empirical optimization of ASL
data analysis using an ASL data processing toolbox: ASLtbx. Magnetic resonance imaging 26, 261-269,
doi:10.1016/j.mri.2007.07.003 (2008).
11. Andersson, J. L.,
Skare, S. & Ashburner, J. How to correct susceptibility distortions in
spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging. NeuroImage 20, 870-888, doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00336-7 (2003).