Klaus Scheffler1,2, Joern Engelmann1, and Rahel Heule1,2
1Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tuebingen, Germany, 2University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
Synopsis
For
reduced refocusing flip angles, the
peak of the vessel size sensitivity curve is shifting towards larger radii
with increasing echo time. The BOLD sensitivity is largely independent of the
refocusing flip angle down to about 40°. CPMG or GRASE can be used with low
refocusing flip angles without significant loss of sensitivity to BOLD and
without the need for centric reordering. Signals acquired before or after the
spin echo time point show contributions from larger vessels similar to gradient
echo sequences. This effect is reduced for longer echo times.
Introduction
While the vessel size specificity of gradient
and spin echoes has been extensively characterized in simulations and
measurements, other sequence types that recently gain increasing attention in
ultra-high field and high-resolution BOLD fMRI such as CPMG and GRASE are yet
not fully characterized (1-2). CPMG or its variant GRASE that samples a
gradient echo train within consecutive (gradient and rf) refocusing pulses
offers a simple possibility for inner volume acquisition by using perpendicular
excitation and refocusing slice orientations which is beneficial for confined high-resolution
BOLD measurements (3-6). Furthermore, CPMG or GRASE offers several sequence
parameters such as variable refocusing flip angles, echo spacing and k-space
reordering schemes along the gradient and spin echo train that might influence
its sensitivity to certain vessel radii. In this contribution, we present an
analysis of the vessel size specificity of CPMG (and GRASE) sequences across
field strength, for different echo spacings, reduced and varying refocusing
flip angles, and for acquisition time points before and after the spin echo to
assess gradient echo related contributions. Results are based on Monte Carlo
simulations of extravascular signals disturbed by randomly oriented cylinders
with different radius as well as with measurements on microspheres.Methods
The calculation
of the extravascular signal was done similarly as described in previous papers,
except that a linear evolution of the spin phase was added during periods of
free precession and random walks to represent higher order configurations that
appear if refocusing pulses with reduced flip angle are applied. Magnetization
was represented by 512 independent magnetization vectors that are in-phase
after the initial 90° excitation pulse. During free precession until the first
refocusing pulse, this set of magnetization vectors see a linear phase
evolution up to ±p resulting
in a net transverse magnetization (sum over this set of spins) of zero. During
the following consecutive refocusing pulses a linear dephasing of ±2p is applied leading
to a spin echo between the first and second refocusing pulse, and a combination
of higher echoes after the second refocusing pulse.
For the experimental
validation of the Monte Carlo simulation results, MR measurements on precision
polybead polystyrene microspheres (Polysciences Europe) of varying diameters
and Dc = 0.1 relative to
water were performed at 3T (Magnetom Prisma, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen,
Germany), similar as described in Bieri and Scheffler (7), using the
64‐channel receive head array coil of the manufacturer.Results
Fig. 1a shows
an example of the vessel size specificity simulated for 3T with an echo spacing
of 10 ms and echo time of 100 ms corresponding to the 10th echo
along the CPMG train for refocusing flip angles from 20° to 180°. A reduction
of the refocusing flip angle causes a shift of the plots towards larger vessel
radii. These findings are corroborated experimentally by the results obtained
from CPMG acquisitions with different refocusing flip angles at 3T in test
tubes containing microspheres with different diameters (Fig. 1b).
The
simulations in Fig. 2 top row show vessel radius with strongest signal change DMmax for different
refocusing flip angles along the CPMG echo train for an echo spacing of 15 ms
and for different field strength. For low refocusing flip angles the vessel
radius at DMmax
increases along the echo train as these echoes are composed of higher-order
echoes with increasingly longer spin history. Fig. 2 bottom row depicts the
mean signal change (DMmean
is the mean signal change along vessel size radius from 0.5 to 300 mm indicating the overall BOLD
response) along the echo train for different constant refocusing flip angles.
In addition, variable refocusing flip angle trains with target echo amplitudes
of 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 M0 are shown as dashed black lines.
The vessel size specificity of asymmetric echoes
is a mixture of the spin echo and gradient echo profiles, as demonstrated in
Fig. 3a. Just before application of the first refocusing pulse, the vessel size
specificity is identical to a gradient echo that shows an unspecific and
constant signal change for all vessels larger than about 3-5 mm. A pure spin echo response is visible at the
center between refocusing pulses with an initially increasing signal change for
early echoes that peaks around TE=60ms and decays for later echoes. Finally,
mean signal changes along longer GRASE echo trains and echo spacings as used in
the papers of Kemper et. al. (6, 8) with variable, and Beckett et. al. (9) with
constant refocusing flip angles are shown in Fig. 3b.Acknowledgements
This
work was funded in part by DFG, a Reinhard Koselleck
Project, DFG SCHE 658/12, and
by the Max Planck Society.References
1.
Constable RT, Kennan RP, Puce A, McCarthy G, Gore JC. Functional NMR
imaging using fast spin echo at 1.5 T. Magn Reson Med 1994;31:686–690.
2.
Poser BA, Norris DG. Fast spin echo sequences for bold functional MRI.
Magma 2007; 20 (1), 11–17.
3.
Feinberg DA, Harel N, Ramanna S, Ugurbil K, Yacoub E. Sub-millimeter
single-shot 3D GRASE with inner volume selection for T2 weighted fMRI
applications at 7 Tesla. Proceedings 16th Annual Meeting International Society
for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2008:p. 2373.
4.
Zimmermann J, Goebel R, De Martino F, van de Moortele PF,
Feinberg D, Adriany G, et al. (2011). Mapping the organization of axis of motion selective
features in human area MT using high-field fMRI. PLoS ONE 6:e28716. doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0028716
5.
De Martino F, Zimmermann J, Muckli L, Ugurbil K, Yacoub
E, Goebel R. (2013). Cortical depth dependent functional responses in humans at
7T: improved specificity with 3D GRASE. PLoS ONE 8:e60514. doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0060514
6.
Kemper VG, De Martino F, Vu AT, Poser BA, Feinberg DA, Goebel R, Yacoub E. Sub-millimeter T2 weighted fMRI at 7 T: comparison of 3D-GRASE and 2D
SE-EPI. Front. Neurosci. 9:163.doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00163
7.
Bieri, O., Scheffler, K.
Effect of diffusion in inhomogeneous magnetic fields on balanced steady-state
free precession. NMR Biomed. 2007. 20, 1–10.
8.
Kemper VG,
De Martino F, Yacoub E, Goebel R. Variable flip
angle 3D-GRASE for high resolution fMRI at 7 T. Magn Reson Med. 2016
September; 76(3): 897–904. doi:10.1002/mrm.25979.
9.
Beckett AJS, Dadakova T, Townsend J, Huber L, Park S,
Feinberg DA. Comparison of BOLD and CBV using 3D EPI and 3D GRASE for cortical layer functional
MRI at 7 T. Magn Reson Med. 2020 Jun 18. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28347. Online ahead of
print. PMID: 32557752.
10.
Busse RF,Hariharan H,Vu A,Brittain JH. Fast Spin Echo Sequences With Very Long Echo
Trains: Design of Variable Refocusing Flip Angle Schedules and Generation of
Clinical T2 Contrast. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 55:1030–1037
(2006).