Lu Wang1, Zhen Xing2, Jian Wu1, Qinqin Yang1, Congbo Cai1, Shuhui Cai 1, Zhong Chen1, and Dairong Cao2
1Department of Electronic Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China, 2Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
Synopsis
Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging is a non-invasive
MR perfusion imaging that could prevent patients from the harm of exogenous
reagent. Previous studies proved that the least square and Bayesian approaches
are so far the best algorithms in IVIM fitting. However, they still suffer from
time-consuming and high noise level. We proposed a deep neural network-based reconstruction method with synthetic
training data for IVIM imaging and extended it to hybrid IVIM-DKI (diffusion
kurtosis imaging) model fitting. Experimental results show that our method owns
prominent performance in both image quality and accuracy of fitting results with
a remarkably short reconstruction time.
Introduction
IVIM biexponential model takes diffusion and perfusion effects of water molecule into consideration simultaneously,1 which makes it possible to obtain patient’s microcirculation network perfusion information without injection of contrast agent. Conventional IVIM fitting methods2,3 are in the mode of pixel by pixel and thus take long reconstruction time. Moreover, the independence of each pixel fitting process easily leads to outliers and distinct graininess. Considering the influence of surrounding pixels, we introduced U-Net with large receptive field into IVIM fitting to eliminate excessive outliers and achieve image smoothing.Method
In vivo DWI images were collected using ten b values for IVIM and thirteen b values for IVIM-DKI on 3T SIEMENS Skyra scanners. As an adequate amount of real training samples is hardly obtainable and ideal training label from in vivo data is also unavailable, synthetic training samples were utilized for network training. In the thought of validating the robustness of our method, we extended our method into IVIM-DKI model fitting. Specific IVIM and hybrid IVIM-DKI model are as follows:
$$S(b)=S_{0}((1-f)e^{-bD}+fe^{-bD^{*}}) $$
$$S(b)=S_{0}((1-f)e^{-bD+\frac{1}{6}(bD)^{2}K}+fe^{-bD^{*}})$$
where D is the pure diffusion coefficient, f is the perfusion fraction, D* is the pseudo-diffusion coefficient, and K is the diffusion kurtosis coefficient; S0 and S(b) are the signals obtained without and with diffusion encoding gradient, respectively.
Figure 1 shows the flow chart of the proposed method. There are roughly three parts in the whole process:
Training samples generation: (1) The D, f and D* (D, f, D* and K for IVIM-DKI model) parametric maps in certain value ranges with suited amount of geometric shapes (circle, rectangle, triangle and ring were involved in our method) were randomly generated. (2) The values of each pixel in the D, f and D* parametric maps were used to calculate corresponding signal intensity value under different b value according to IVIM model. (3) A set of D, f and D* parametric maps together with the synthetic DWI images form a training sample. The above steps were repeated to acquire sufficient samples for network training.
Network training: The synthetic DWI images were used as the network input, and the corresponding randomly generated D, f and D* parametric maps were employed as the labels.
Network prediction: In vivo DWI images were fed into the trained network, then related IVIM parameters were estimated and parametric maps were reconstructed. Results
Figure 2 illustrates fitting results of three
types of glioma named oligodendroglioma (Fig. 2a), IDH
wild-type astrocytoma (Fig. 2b), and IDH-mutated astrocytoma (Fig. 2c) using
IVIM model. Postcontrast T1 weighted images are given to display
approximate lesion appearance of each patient. Compared to least square2
and Bayesian3 approaches, our U-Net based reconstruction method
produces clearer and better parametric maps without losing lesion details. Other
than that, more perfusion information (the areas indicated by red arrows) are obviously
contained in our f parametric maps,
which means our method get more accurate lesion composition. Figure 3 shows fitting
results of IVIM-DKI model on exactly the same cerebral tumor types as Figure 2.
Similarly, noise is reduced greatly on parametric maps derived from our
proposed method, while least square curve-fitting4 fabricates severe
graininess. Furthermore, we evaluated the veracity of different algorithms using
synthetic DWI data under different signal-to-noise (SNR) in IVIM fitting. Root mean
square error (RMSE) was employed as assessment criterion and calculation
results in Figure 4 suggest an apparently high accuracy of our method since
U-Net is associated with the lowest RMSE for all 3 parameters. The fitting time
is 5-7 minutes for the least square approach, 20-30 minutes for the Bayesian
approach, and several seconds for our proposed method. That is, our method
takes orders of magnitude shorter time than classical ones. In brief, the
proposed IVIM reconstruction method is better, faster and stronger than
previous common algorithms. Discussion
We
put forward a training sample generation method based on theoretical model for
neural network to surmount the shortage of ground truth. The reconstructed results
for the two models studied herein reveal its applicability. According to our
experiments, the quality of parametric maps obtained from the proposed method
moderately depends on the selection of preset parameter value range. An
understandable explanation is the preset parameter value range could be
regarded as prior knowledge for network learning. The degree of consistency of parameter
value ranges between synthetic samples and real experimental data could have certain
impact on neural network outputs. Conclusion
The
proposed U-Net based IVIM reconstruction method shows better results than least
square and Bayesian algorithm. It achieves more precise quantitative perfusion results
and far less noisy parametric maps in an efficient way, showing significant potential
in clinical applications as an auxiliary diagnosis tool. Acknowledgements
This
work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant
numbers 11775184 and 81671674.References
1. Lebihan
D, Breton E, Lallemand D, et al. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent
motions-application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders.
Radiology 1986;161:401-407.
2. Jalnefjord
O, Montelius M, Starck G, et al. Optimization of b-value schemes for estimation
of the diffusion coefficient and the perfusion fraction with segmented
intravoxel incoherent motion model fitting. Magn. Reson. Med. 2019;82:1541-1552.
3. Gustafsson
O, Montelius M, Starck G, et al. Impact of prior distributions and central
tendency measures on Bayesian intravoxel incoherent motion model fitting. Magn.
Reson. Med. 2018;79:1674-1683.
4. Wen
CW, Shun CY, Ya FC, et al. Simultaneous assessment of cerebral blood volume and
diffusion heterogeneity using hybrid IVIM and DK MR imaging: initial experience
with brain tumors. Eur. Radiol. 2017;27:306-314.