Feng Jia1, Sebastian Littin1, Philipp Amrein1, Maximilian Frederik Russe1, and Maxim Zaitsev1,2
1Department of Radiology, Medical Physics, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany, 2High Field MR Center Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Synopsis
TODO
Simulation of peripheral
nerve stimulation of MRI gradient coils for an
interventional radiologist.
Introduction
Predicting thresholds of
peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has raised increasing interest recently1-3. PNS simulation of MRI gradient coils for human subjects undergoing MR
imaging has been successfully explored using realistic human body models3. However,
MRI-guided procedures may require
the radiologist or technician to reach into the scanner bore during the measurement. Up to now, PNS safety evaluation for radiologic
personnel has not been attempted and the corresponding thresholds remain
unknown. In this work, quasi-static
electromagnetic calculations combined with neurodynamic simulations are used to
estimate PNS thresholds for the interventionalist. Methods
A PNS simulation was performed using the
following steps. Firs, magnetic vector potential generated by a gradient coil
in a posable human body model configured to lean into the magnet bore while
standing at the patient table was obtained using the Biot-Savart law based on
the precise coil wire tracks. The magnetic
vector potential was used to calculate the induced electric fields in the human
body deploying a quasi-static magnetic solver.
Finally, the NEURON4 solver was employed to simulate PNS thresholds for the
human body model using the resulting electric field. All steps were implemented
in Sim4Life (ZMT Zurich MedTech AG, Zurich, Switzerland). The Yoon-Sun V4.0
female human-body model (height: 152 cm, weight: 54.6 kg, body mass index: 23.6) which includes
trajectories of the main peripheral nerves
(IT'IS foundation, Zurich, Switzerland) was used
for electrical field and PNS simulations.
The wire tracks of the gradient coil of the 70 cm 1.5T Aera
scanner (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) were used. PNS thresholds of a typical patient position
(Fig. 1.a) were also simulated and served as a reference. The position
of the interventionalist is shown in Fig. 1.b. The PNS thresholds were predicted for the x-, y-
and z- gradient channels, respectively. In the
neurodynamic simulation, a trapezoidal waveform
with a risetime of 0.15 ms and a flat top duration of 0.5 ms was assessed.Results and Discussion
Figure 2 presents the magnitude of the electrical
field in the human body model with a typical position as a measured subject centered
on the head generated
by the Gy coil. As shown, high electric
field magnitudes occur in the regions close to shoulders, ribs and hipbones.
Figure 3 shows the stimulated sites. The
strongest stimulation is predicted at the
right suprascapular nerve. In this case, the simulated PNS threshold is equal
to 20.39 mT/m. Considering that the experimental PNS threshold has the mean value of 25.25 mT/m and the standard deviation
of 4.87 mT/m, the simulated PNS threshold is in the range of the experimental values and therefore validates our PNS simulation setup.
Figure 4 displays the
electric field magnitudes in the human body model with a typical position of an
interventionalist reaching onto the magnet bore (Fig. 1.b). Here, the
electrical fields generated by the Gx, Gy and Gz gradient coils are shown. The
high electric field magnitudes occur in the regions of the head
for all three gradient axes. A possible reason for this phenomenon is that the head of the interventionallist is
located close to the return paths of the Gx and Gz coils or to the main
windings of the Gz channel. For all axes the primary sites of stimulations were
predicted at the trigeminal nerve. The simulated PNS thresholds are equal to
95.67 mT/m, 66.86 mT/m and 51.4 mT/m for the Gx, Gy and Gz gradient coils,
respectively. The values indicate that the PNS thresholds for the investigated position
of the interventionalist are higher than that for the subject in the bore at
least by a factor of 2.52. Therefore, in the operation mode that is safe for
the imaged subject, it is unlikely to achieve PNS in the interventionalist. Additional human body models, further positions and body postures of
an interventionalist and other pulse durations will be investigated in future. Conclusions
A posable human body model allows one to predict
PNS thresholds for an interventionalist in a standing position leaning onto the
magnet bore. The preliminary results suggest that PNS is unlikely to occur in
the body of the interventionalist if the safety limits for the imaged subject
are enforced.Acknowledgements
The authors are deeply grateful to Dr. Axel Vom Endt, Dr. Heiko Rohdjess and Dr. Martino Leghissa at Siemens Healthcare (Erlangen/Forchheim) for their generous support. Financial support by the Federal
Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (project number 13GW0356B) is also gratefully acknowledged.References
[1] Davids et al. Sci. Rep.
2017;7:5316; [2] Klein et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 2019;64:015005; [3] Davids et
al. MRM 2019;81:686; [4] Hines and Carnevale, Neural Comput. 1997;9:1179;