Nastaren Abad1, Luca Marinelli1, Radhika Madhavan1, and Tom K.F Foo1
1General Electric Global Research, Niskayuna, NY, United States
Synopsis
Higher
spatial and angular resolution is essential in diffusion MRI to resolve
fiber and structural ambiguities. However, quantitative measures are confounded by low SNR,
particularly at high b-values, compensation of which leads to longer acquisition
times. In this study, the fundamental question asked is: Can denoising aid
the stability of the measurement in the presence of increasing noise? Model
based denoising was used to explore accelerated sampling by evaluating bias
developed in qualitative and quantitative end points. Experimental results
highlight superior performance, compared to ground truth, in noise and bias
reduction in metrics along with structure preservation.
Introduction
Multi-shell
diffusion MRI (dMRI) is widely used to inform microstructure studies. Higher
spatial resolution is required to fully capture the complex architecture of white
matter, while higher angular sampling provides more reliable estimates for
the underlying microstructure. However, dMRI is more susceptible to image noise
leading to reduced interpretability and quantitative accuracy. Degraded image
quality can be compensated by sampling more diffusion encoding directions, or
by averaging. However, due to scan time limitations, this is not a practical
approach for clinical studies. To accelerate acquisition and explore
measurement cardinality (low-rank structure), denoising approaches have been
proposed, but denoising can also result in compromised parameter space and unwanted
spatial smoothing.
Model
based denoising using a generalized spherical deconvolution approach (GenSD) was
introduced1 to accelerate kurtosis imaging with as few as 30
sampling directions. With GenSD, signal at each voxel is modeled as a weighted
linear combination of Gaussian basis functions, with the recovery of
coefficients formulated as a non-linear optimization. The model operates
entirely in diffusion space without spatial regularization, with the benefit
that, unlike principal component analysis (PCA)-based techniques, data redundancy
does not have to be leveraged for an accurate threshold.
In
this study, the parameter space for GenSD was optimized for use with high-performance
gradient acquisitions of dMRI data. To establish minimal bias, denoising was compared
to a ground truth dataset by evaluating qualitative proof points in the form of
neuroanatomical feature retention and quantitative proof points, by evaluating
tensor metrics such as fractional anisotropy (FA), and orthogonal kurtosis
(OrthoK). Furthermore, to objectively assess variability the stability and
reproducibility, tractogram-derived structural connectivity matrices was
evaluated. Methods
Ground-truth dataset was defined as that acquired in a healthy volunteer under
an IRB-approved protocol on a 3T MRI system (GE SIGNA MR750, GE Healthcare,
Waukesha, WI, USA), equipped with a head-only MAGNUS gradient coil. A
32-channel phased array head coil (NOVA Medical, Wilmington, MA) was used for
all acquisitions. The MAGNUS2 gradient coil operates at 200mT/m with a maximum
slew rate of 500T/m/s using standard clinical 1MVA system electronics. A multi-shell
acquisition was utilized with 45,60,80, and 100 directions with points
distributed such that the sampling pattern minimized the energy of
electrostatic repulsion for points on a sphere3, for b-values of 500,1000,2000, and 4000 s/mm2. An additional 16 non-diffusion weighted
(T2-weighted,b=0) images were interspersed through the acquisition.
For TE/TR=44.2/7000ms, 160x160x86 matrix, diffusion data were acquired with
an isotropic resolution of 1.5x1.5x1.5 mm3 with an overall
acquisition time of 30min.
Diffusion
weighted images were corrected for gradient non-linearity, eddy-current
distortion, bulk motion and susceptibility using an in-house image processing pipeline.
Accelerated acquisitions were generated by deriving candidate subsets from
ground-truth, by drawing the desired number of directions to maximize angular incoherence3,
while preserving the rotationally invariant properties4.
GenSD
denoising, was applied to all the subsets. Diffusion and kurtosis tensors were
fitted using an iterative weighted least-squares approach to compute FA and
OrthoK. Fiber orientation distribution functions (fODFs) were computed using
mrtrix5, by estimating tissue response using the Dhollander
algorithm, and implementing multi-shell multi-tissue CSD5. WM constrained probabilistic tractograms were generated for all datasets using the
iFOD26 algorithm with dynamic seeding. Edge metrics for connectivity
matrices, generated from the tractograms and node parcellation using automated
anatomical labeling(AAL: 116 parcels), were defined either by streamline count
and filtered to reduce bias via the SIFT algorithm7 or by mean
streamline length, scaled by the inverse of the two node volumes8. A binary connectivity determination between
ground truth and denoised accelerated datasets was used to generate receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves to characterize performance, further compared using the area-under-the-curve
(AUC) metric. Results and Discussion
Qualitative
assessment highlights that model-based denoising did not compromise spatial
structure (Figure 1). Even with accelerated acquisitions of 60-directions, fine
striatal cell bridges can be recovered with denoising (Figure 2). Because of
the model’s high degrees of freedom (3-anisotropic & 70-isotropic
compartments), with accelerated acquisitions, quantitative metrics are
marginally impacted evidenced by bias reduction (Figure 3) compared to no
denoising on board. Kurtosis, mostly constrained by high b-value data, is
particularly sensitive to noise, thus the derived data benefits significantly
from genSD denoising (Figure 3). Importantly, as the sample size was decreased,
the bias reduction allowed for a corresponding ~2-3x reduction in scan time
compared to ground truth.
With
connectivity measures, false streamlines are of great concern. Particularly after
denoising, there is a need to ensure the data is not being altered. Comparison
to ground truth and denoising was initially based on a simple threshold of
whether connections were altered, with denoising indicating a slightly higher
true positive rate for ROC curves, and RMSE in connectivity plots (Figure 5). The
impact of streamline length on tractography is well reported, where generally
longer bundles are over-represented, and smaller harder-to-track bundles are
underrepresented. As error propagates, long streamlines can propagate from one
bundle to another creating an artificial bundle, ergo, the longer the track the
less reliable its trajectory. A more quantitative analysis to build a
distribution of these differences is in progress. Conclusions
Combined
with GenSD denoising, acquisition time can be accelerated ~2-3x while
preserving fine anatomical details and establishing minimal bias in tensor-derived
metrics with slight stability in structural connectivity analysis.Acknowledgements
Grant funding from
NIH U01EB28976, CDMRP W81XWH-16-2-0054References
1.
Sperl JI, et al.,
Magn Reson Med. 2017
2.
Foo TK, et al., Magn
Reson Med. 2019
3. Jones
DK, et al., Magn Reson Med. 2004
4.
Skare
S, et al., J Magn Reson. 2000
5.
Tournier,
J.-D. et al., NeuroImage, 2019
6.
Tournier, J.-D..
Proc ISMRM, 2010,
7.
Smith,
R. E.; et al., NeuroImage, 2015
8.
Hagmann, P, et al.,
PLoS Biology 2007