Kentaro Akazawa1, Koji Sakai1, Tomoaki Kitaguchi1, Tomonori Toyotsuji1, Thorsten Feiweier 2, Hiroshi Imai3, and Kei Yamada1
1Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan, 2Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany, 3Siemens Healthcare K.K., Shinagawa, Japan
Synopsis
The
mixing time for double diffusion encoding (DDE) should be set low to reduce the
relaxation effects but also high enough for estimating microscopic fractional
anisotropy. We tested the adequacy of the mixing time of 30 msec by comparing
acquisitions with parallel and anti-parallel directions as well as with
orthogonal and collinear directions. Relatively short mixing time for our
cohort was adequate to evaluate the microscopic fractional anisotropy not only
in the normal brain area of the white matter and the central gray matter, but
also in pathologically abnormal areas such as brain tumors.
INTRODUCTION
Microscopic
diffusion anisotropy (μFA) measurements from double diffusion encoding (DDE)
promise greater specificity to changes in tissue microstructure compared with
conventional diffusion tensor imaging.1, 2 The relative signal
intensities (rSIs) of DDE images change depending on the angle between two
encoding directions and mixing time. The mixing time is the interval between
the two motion-probing gradients and it needs to be set long enough for μFA
estimation. However, longer mixing time prolongs the echo time (TE) and results
in reduced signal-to-noise ratio. In the past studies, a variety of mixing times
were used from 15 msec to 45 msec.3-7 The aim of the study was to
test the assumption that a relatively short mixing time of 30 msec is adequate
for DDE study on clinical scanner to evaluate the microstructure not only in
normal brain structures but also in pathologically abnormal areas such as brain
tumors.METHODS
The
study was approved by the review committee of our institution. Sixteen patients
with enhancing tumors (11 Glioblastomas, 3 Metastases, 2 primary central nerve
system lymphomas) were enrolled in the study. Data was acquired on a clinical
3T scanner (MAGNETOM Skyra, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). For
clinical purpose, contrast-enhanced 3-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid
acquisition gradient-echo and turbo spin-echo T2-weighted images (T2WI) were
obtained in all patients. Additionally, angular DDE measurements were performed
with the prototype DDE single-shot echo-planar sequence. In addition to a b0
image, 72 DDE combinations of b2000 images were acquired. The first encodings
of the DDE were the twelve directions toward the vertices of the icosahedron. Second
encodings were set to the same 12 directions (parallel), 12 opposite directions
(anti-parallel), and 48 orthogonal directions (orthogonal) as the first
encodings. The mixing time was 30 msec. TR/TE = 6200/146 msec, FOV = 210 mm, pixel
size = 1.5 x 1.5 mm2, PAT factor = 2, SMS factor=2, slice thickness =
3mm and acquisition time = 8 min 32 sec or 11 min 1 sec which were related to the
slice numbers of 26 or 34, to cover the entire areas with signal abnormality on
T2WI.
Averaged
rSIs of each pixel on the parallel, anti-parallel and orthogonal directions
were extracted at the area of enhancing tumor core, normal brain structures of
the thalamus, white matter regions such as the genu (GCC) and splenium (SCC) of
corpus callosum, the posterior limbs of internal capsule (PLIC), the corona
radiata, the centrum semiovale (CS) including high convexity white matter (HCWM)
superior to CS, the middle cerebellar peduncles (MCP), and lateral
ventricle (Fig.1). The regions of interest (ROIs) for the white matter regions
were created by combining all ROIs of white matter structures described above.
We compared the rSIs of the parallel and anti-parallel directions and the
collinear and orthogonal directions. Data were then analyzed by simple regression
analysis and Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction. We
considered P values < .05 to indicate a significant difference.RESULTS
The rSIs
of the parallel and anti-parallel directions had highly significant correlations
in all areas (p < 0.001) and were
close to the straight lines with slope 1, which indicated that they could be
equivalent (Fig.2).
The scatter
plots showed that rSIs of enhanced lesions were found in a wider range than those
of normal brain structures and had highly significant correlations (Fig. 2, 3).
Although the high correlations were found in the thalamus and the white matter,
the rSIs of the orthogonal direction in normal brain structures were lower than
those of collinear directions (average of the parallel and the anti-parallel
directions) (Fig. 3), and they were significantly lower than those of the
enhanced lesions (Fig. 4). The rSIs of the CSF tended to be low and highly
correlated in scatter plots.DISCUSSION
In
tissues with high μFA, the signal change corresponding to the DDE angle shows a
cosine dependence for short mixing times, and rSIs will increase in the following
order parallel, orthogonal, and anti-parallel directions.8 On the
other hand, it is known that a long enough mixing time can yield a signal
dependence with a W shape, and rSIs of the parallel and the anti-parallel
direction are equal, and both of them are higher than those of the orthogonal
direction.8 In this study, rSIs of the parallel and the anti-parallel
directions were equivalent in all areas, suggesting that the mixing time of 30
msec should be sufficiently long not only in the normal brain tissues but also
brain tumors.
The
results that rSIs of the collinear directions were higher than those of the orthogonal
direction may indicate microstructural anisotropy in the normal brain structures,
and the absence of this trend in the brain tumors suggested that microstructural
changes should have been occurring. We expect to increase the number of
clinical cases in the future, which would enable unveiling differences in types
and prognosis of brain tumors by using DDE.CONCLUSION
A relatively
short mixing time for DDE is likely to be adequate not only in the areas of normal
white matters and central gray matters, but also in pathologically abnormal
areas such as brain tumors.Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP19K08233.
The authors wish to thank Hiroyasu Ikeno, RT, and Toshiaki Nakagawa, RT, for helping with this study.
References
1. Shemesh
N, Özarslan E, Komlosh ME, et al. From single‐pulsed field gradient to double‐pulsed field
gradient MR: gleaning new microstructural information and developing new forms
of contrast in MRI. NMR Biomed 2010;23:757–780.
2. Callaghan
PT. Translational dynamics and magnetic resonance: principles of pulsed
gradient spin echo NMR. Oxford,UK: Oxford University Press; 2011. 547 p.
3. Jespersen
SN, Lundell H, Sønderby CK, et al. Orientationally invariant metrics of
apparent compartment eccentricity from double pulsed field gradient diffusion
experiments. NMR Biomed. 2013;26(12):1647-62.
4. Lawrenz
M, Brassen S, Finsterbusch J. Microscopic diffusion anisotropy in the human
brain: Age-related changes. Neuroimage. 2016 1;141:313-325
5. Lawrenz
M, Finsterbusch J. Detection of microscopic diffusion anisotropy in human
cortical gray matter in vivo with double diffusion encoding. Magn Reson Med.
2019;81(2):1296-1306.
6. Yang G,
Tian Q, Leuze C, et al. Double diffusion encoding MRI for the clinic. Magn
Reson Med. 2018;80(2):507-520.
7. Kamiya K,
Kamagata K, Ogaki K, et al. Brain White-Matter Degeneration Due to Aging and
Parkinson Disease as Revealed by Double Diffusion Encoding. Front Neurosci.
2020;15;14:584510
8.
Finsterbusch J. Multiple-Wave-Vector Diffusion-Weighted NMR. Annu Rep
Spectrosc. 2011;72:225-299