Toshiaki Taoka1,2, Rintaro Ito1,2, Rei Nakamichi2, Takashi Abe2, Toshiki Nakane2, Hisashi Kawai2, Mayuko Sakai3, and Shinji Naganawa2
1Department of Innovative Biomedical Visualization (iBMV), Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan, 2Radiology, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan, 3Canon Medical Systems Corporation, Otawara, Japan
Synopsis
We conducted water peak MRS without water
suppression, in which the water peak itself is evaluated, to determine if the
water peak is altered by the existence of solutes and to evaluate the
feasibility of water peak MRS for detecting pathologic changes in CSF. The
water peaks were modified by the solute concentrations of NaCl, Glu, and Alb.
Differences in water peaks were observed among the CSF phantom simulating
normal CSF, CSF with bacterial meningitis, and CSF with obstruction of the
subarachnoid space.
INTRODUCTION
Usually, magnetic resonance spectroscopy
(MRS) uses a water suppression technique to suppress signals from free water
because a section of the very large peak of free water causes a baseline offset,
thereby affecting the small signals of metabolites [1]. However, we
hypothesized that the peak of water as a solvent can be modified by solutes and
that the alterations of the water peak in MRS may provide biological or
chemical information.
The purpose of the current study was to (1)
determine whether the peak of the water in MRS is altered by the existence of
various solutes at different concentrations and (2) to evaluate the feasibility
of water peak evaluation in MRS for the detection of pathologic changes in
cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by using an artificial CSF phantom.METHODS
The phantoms of NaCl, glucose (Glu), and
albumin (Alb) at various concentrations, as well as the artificial CSF phantom
simulating normal and pathologic status of samples, were assessed. The
concentrations of the NaCl, Glu, and Alb phantoms are shown in Figure 1a. An
artificial CSF phantom, including normal CSF; simulated CSF with bacterial
meningitis, which has an increased protein concentration and decreased glucose
concentration; and simulated CSF with obstruction of the subarachnoid space,
which has a markedly increased protein concentration, was prepared as shown in
Figure 1b.
Phantom studies of proton MRS were
performed using a point-resolved spectroscopy sequence. The parameters of MRS were as follows: TR/TE,
2000/32 msec.; voxel size, 15×15×15 mm; 8 acquisitions; spectral width 2,000
Hz, without water peak suppression. The temperature of the phantom was 22.3°C.
The DICOM data of MRS were exported as CSV files using TARQUIN (Version 4.3.5),
and the water peaks of the NaCl, Glu, and Alb phantoms were evaluated with
respect to peak height and full width at half maximum (FWHM). The water peaks
of artificial CSF phantoms were evaluated to detect any differences.RESULTS
(1) Phantoms of NaCl, Glu, and Alb
The water peaks of the NaCl phantom at
various concentrations are shown in Figure 1. The higher concentration of NaCl
showed a lower peak height, and the order of the peak height and concentration
was linear. The water peak of the Glu phantom and Alb phantom are is shown in
Figures 2, and 3, respectively. For these organic compound solutes, the orders
of the peak height and concentration were not linear, and the side slope of the
peak showed higher signals.
(2) Artificial CSF phantom
The water peaks of the artificial CSF
phantom simulating various conditions are shown in Figure 4. Although the water
peaks simulating normal CSF, CSF with bacterial meningitis, and CSF with
obstruction of the subarachnoid space showed similar results for the gross
shape, differences in detail were observed. DISCUSSION
Almost 80% of the human brain is made up of
water, and MR techniques use large signals from the water. However, in MRS,
most of the signals from the brain are suppressed by solvent suppression to
observe small signals from specific solutes such as choline, creatine,
n-acetyl-aspartate, or other metabolites. A similar water suppression technique
is also applied in the field of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), in which
water absorbance is considered an obstacle to the analytical process of other
molecules. Some studies have recently succeeded in analyzing the water
absorbance itself using NIRS to describe the dynamic biological and aqueous
systems based on the behavior of water [2].
The current study was aimed to be a pilot
study to evaluate the feasibility of observing water peaks in MRS to evaluate
biological information, especially that of CSF. In the evaluation of the NaCl,
Glu, and Alb phantoms, the water peaks showed different peak heights according
to difference in concentration. It is logical that the peak of the water signal
as a solvent is modified by the existence of the solute by modifying the
electric cloud caused by hydrogen bonds or other chemical interactions. In the
evaluation of artificial CSF, although very small, we could observe differences
in the peaks of CFS of different compositions. CSF examination in clinical
practice is an invasive and risky procedure. The observation in the current
study suggests the possibility of non-invasive CSF examination by water peak
MRS, and a potential continuation of this pilot study would be exploring the
analysis of subtle differences of the water peak using artificial intelligence
or fingerprinting methods.CONCLUSION
We conducted water peak MRS, in which water suppression was not applied and the peak of the water itself was evaluated. Water peaks were modified by differences in the concentrations of NaCl, Glu, and Alb. Differences in water peaks were also observed among the CSF phantom simulating normal CSF, CSF with bacterial meningitis, and CSF with obstruction of the subarachnoid space.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Zheng
G, Price WS. Solvent signal suppression in NMR. Progress in Nuclear Magnetic
Resonance Spectroscopy. 2010;56(3):267-88.
2. Jinendra
B, Tamaki K, Kuroki S, Vassileva M, Yoshida S, Tsenkova R. Near infrared
spectroscopy and aquaphotomics: Novel approach for rapid in vivo diagnosis of
virus infected soybean. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;397(4):685-90.