Loredana Storelli1, Elisabetta Pagani1, Paolo Preziosa1,2, Massimo Filippi1,2,3,4,5, and Maria A. Rocca1,2,5
1Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy, 2Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy, 3Neurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy, 4Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy, 5Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
Synopsis
When investigating white matter (WM),
its complex microstructure should be considered. Neurite Orientation Dispersion
and Density Imaging (NODDI) and the constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD)
are diffusion weighted imaging models that account for this complexity,
compared to the commonly used MRI techniques. In this study, we applied
volumetric, diffusion tensor, NODDI and CSD models to 86 patients with multiple
sclerosis and 55 healthy controls at baseline and after 1-year of follow-up.
The comparison of these techniques both globally and voxel-based showed that the CSD
model was able to identify WM atrophy offering greater anatomical specificity
and biological interpretability.
Introduction
Neurodegeneration
is a significant pathological hallmark of multiple sclerosis (MS).1 Using MRI, gray matter (GM) atrophy
demonstrated its prognostic value for the clinical evolution of the disease in
respect to white matter (WM) atrophy.2-4 However, WM damage has been mainly assessed using
volumetric measures or the diffusion tensor (DT) MRI model.5-7 In recent years, more advanced diffusion
weighted imaging (DWI) models have been proposed to study the complex WM
microstructure: Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI) and
the constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD).8, 9 Aims of this study were: to
study WM atrophy both cross-sectionally and longitudinally with advanced DWI
techniques; to assess whether these new measures of WM atrophy would better
explain clinical disability in comparison with the conventionally used metrics.Methods
86 patients with MS (43
relapsing-remitting [RR], 32 secondary progressive [SP] and 11 primary
progressive MS) and 55 sex-matched healthy controls (HC) were enrolled. 60 MS
and 22 HC performed a follow-up re-evaluation after one year from the
inclusion. Brain 3D
FLAIR, 3D T1-weighted MPRAGE and a multi-shell DWI were acquired at baseline
and follow-up on a 3T Philips
scanner, together with a clinical assessment.
Pre-processing of DWI included correction for off-resonance, eddy current
induced distortions and movement.10 The DT was estimated by linear
regression using DWI data at b=700
and 1000 s/mm2, and maps of fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean
diffusivity (MD) were derived.11 For NODDI model, intra- and extracellular
volume fraction maps were computed, using the NODDI Matlab Toolbox and default
parameters (http://www.nitrc.org/projects/noddi_toolbox).12 The intra-cellular volume (vic) was
estimated according to:
$$vic=(1-fiso )*ficvf $$
where fiso and ficvf
were respectively the isotropic and intracellular volume fraction maps; while
the extracellular volume fraction was computed as:
$$vec=(1-fiso )*(1-fic)$$
A fixel-based
morphometry analysis was applied to estimate voxel-wise fiber bundle cross-section
atrophy (FC) in MS patients against HC (http://www.mrtrix.org/).13 Each subject’s fiber orientation
distribution (FOD) image was registered to the template (obtained by 10 HC and
10 age- and sex-matched RRMS) via an FOD-guided non-linear registration. For each fiber in the template
mask, the overall volume change (Jacobian determinant) was estimated, giving
the expansion or contraction in the perpendicular plane (FC).
For both baseline
and follow-up, we obtained global measures of WM damage (WM volume [WMV], FA,
MD, vic, FC) averaged within the normal appearing WM of each subject,
as well as voxel-based maps.
All statistical
comparisons were performed between HC and MS, HC and RRMS, RRMS and SPMS.Results
Global MRI metrics showed lower
brain tissue volumes and significantly altered DW metrics in MS compared to
controls (p<0.001). These significant differences were also
detectable in the comparisons among the different subgroups (HC vs RRMS, RRMS vs SPMS). In RRMS compared to HC, we found a
significant FC atrophy of the cortico-spinal tract, splenium of the corpus
callosum, optic radiation and the left cingulum (p-value<0.05, Figure 1). A significant FC reduction was
found in SPMS compared to RRMS patients mainly in the middle cerebellar
peduncles, cortico-spinal tract, splenium of the corpus callosum, anterior
commissure and bilateral cingulum (p-value<0.05,
Figure 1). All MS
patients exhibited significant decreases in FA and increases in MD (p-value<0.05) in WM regions mainly associated
with WM lesions (periventricular WM and corpus callosum), similarly to the Vic
measure (although more circumscribed), as shown in Figure 2. The voxel-based
morphometry showed significant WM atrophy of the splenium of the corpus
callosum and the brainstem in MS compared to HC. However, FA, MD, vic
and WMV showed no significant alterations when considering HC vs RRMS, RRMS vs SPMS.
Only the global measure of FC identified a significant
longitudinal WM atrophy in MS (p-value<0.05), even when considering the different
phenotypes. Voxel-based analyses at follow-up confirmed the baseline results
(Figures 3 and 4), with a degeneration mainly located in the splenium of the
corpus callosum, anterior commissure and cingulum in progressive MS patients. Globally,
only FA and FC showed a significant correlation (R=-0.55 and -0.4 respectively)
with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), both at baseline and at
follow-up.Discussion
Advanced DWI methods could be applied
in MS for a fiber-specific study of the complex WM microstructure. Considered
voxel-averaged in the WM, vic and FC did not show significant
improvements in diversifying HC and MS patients (even when considering different
subgroups). However, in the assessment of longitudinal variations, only FC
measure was able to reveal a significant global WM degeneration in MS patients
compared to HC, associated to disability. On the other hand, voxel-based
analyses clearly confirmed the ability of the FC measure to detect atrophy in more
specific and meaningful WM tracts (both at baseline and follow-up), in respect
to the other measures. By applying this diffusion method, it was possible to identify
and compare specific fiber-bundle atrophy quantitatively between groups.Conclusions
The application of advanced DWI methods showed the presence
of WM neurodegeneration since the early stages of MS. In particular, the fiber-based
findings allowed substantial atrophy changes to be detected and offered greater
anatomical specificity and biological interpretability by identifying
tract-specific differences. Acknowledgements
Funding. This
study has been partially supported by FISM—Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi
Multipla—cod. 2018/R/16 and financed or cofinanced with the “5 per mille”
public fundingReferences
1. Lassmann
H. Multiple Sclerosis Pathology. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2018;8.
2. Damjanovic D, Valsasina P, Rocca MA, et
al. Hippocampal and Deep Gray Matter Nuclei Atrophy Is Relevant for Explaining
Cognitive Impairment in MS: A Multicenter Study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
2017;38:18-24.
3. Roosendaal SD, Bendfeldt K, Vrenken H,
et al. Grey matter volume in a large cohort of MS patients: relation to MRI
parameters and disability. Mult Scler 2011;17:1098-1106.
4. Filippi M, Preziosa P, Copetti M, et
al. Gray matter damage predicts the accumulation of disability 13 years later.
Neurology 2013;81:1759-1767.
5. Parisi L, Rocca MA, Mattioli F, et al.
Patterns of regional gray matter and white matter atrophy in cortical multiple
sclerosis. J Neurol 2014;261:1715-1725.
6. Pierpaoli C, Barnett A, Pajevic S, et
al. Water diffusion changes in Wallerian degeneration and their dependence on
white matter architecture. Neuroimage 2001;13:1174-1185.
7. Rocca MA, Parisi L, Pagani E, et al.
Regional but not global brain damage contributes to fatigue in multiple
sclerosis. Radiology 2014;273:511-520.
8. Jeurissen B, Tournier JD, Dhollander T,
Connelly A, Sijbers J. Multi-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution for
improved analysis of multi-shell diffusion MRI data. Neuroimage
2014;103:411-426.
9. Roine T, Jeurissen B, Perrone D, et al.
Informed constrained spherical deconvolution (iCSD). Med Image Anal
2015;24:269-281.
10. Andersson JLR, Graham MS, Drobnjak I, Zhang
H, Filippini N, Bastiani M. Towards a comprehensive framework for movement and
distortion correction of diffusion MR images: Within volume movement.
Neuroimage 2017;152:450-466.
11. Behrens TE, Woolrich MW, Jenkinson M, et
al. Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion-weighted MR
imaging. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:1077-1088.
12. Schneider T, Brownlee W, Zhang H,
Ciccarelli O, Miller DH, Wheeler-Kingshott CG. Sensitivity of multi-shell NODDI
to multiple sclerosis white matter changes: a pilot study. Funct Neurol
2017;32:97-101.
13. Raffelt
DA, Tournier JD, Smith RE, et al. Investigating white matter fibre density and
morphology using fixel-based analysis. Neuroimage 2017;144:58-73.