Lihua Chen1, Ailian Liu1, Jiazheng Wang2, Yishi Wang2, and Qingwei Song1
1The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China, 2Philips Healthcare, Beijing, China
Synopsis
Liver MRI was conducted with both 4D-Flow and
APTw imaging before and after a meal challenge. After the meal, significantly increased blood
flow velocity and volume were observed in portal vein (PV) and superior
mesenteric vein (SMV) and significantly decreased blood flow was observed in splenic
vein (PV), while no change was observed in APT values (MTRasym) in liver
parenchyma after the meal.
Introduction
Amide
proton transfer-weighted (APTw) imaging is a novel imaging tool for the detection
of amide protons in mobile cellular proteins and peptides 1.Emerging
time-resolved 3D MRIfor blood flow assessment (4D-Flow sequence)provides
simultaneous and spatially-coregistered anatomical and hemodynamic information of
all vessels within the imaging volume2-3.Meal challenges are standard
clinical procedures applied in imaging modalities such as ultrasound and MRI to
induce physiological hyperemia4. The purpose of this study was to monitor
the changes in liver APT value (MTRasym) and the portal system blood
flow changes through a meal challenge in healthy volunteers to investigate the
feasibility of non-invasively quantifying the hemodynamic changes in pathological
conditions.Methods
This study has been approved by the institutional IRB. Ten healthy subjects were prospectively enrolled for MRI examination at
3.0 T (Ingenia CX, Philips Healthcare, the Netherlands) with a 16-channel abdominal
array coil. The MR protocol
included a 3D APTw imaging (axial, TR/TE = 6500/8 ms, FOV = 139×98 mm2,
resolution = 2.0×2.0×7 mm3, scan time = 210s) a 2D quantitative flow sequence
(axial, TR/TE = 4.4/2.7 ms, FOV = 200×200 mm2, resolution = 1.5×1.5×8 mm3, PC
direction = RL, PC velocity = 200 cm/s, scan time = 13 s) to measure the flow
velocity in the portal vein as a reference for velocity encodings (VENC), and a
4D-Flow sequence with compressed sensing (CS) acceleration (axial, TR/TE =
5.0/3.2 ms, FOV = 300×350 mm2, resolution = 2.5×2.5×2.5 mm3, PC direction = RL-AP-FH, CS
=8, scan time = 370 s) for hemodynamic quantification. VENC was set to 30 cm/s
for the 4D flow sequence to slightly surpass the measured velocity and avoid
phase wrapping. Scans were taken immediately before the meal and repeated 30
min after the meal. The acquired images were processed on CVI42 (Canada Circle
Cardiovascular Imaging)by two radiologists to
obtain a 3D angiogram (Figure 1). The measurement planes were put at the middle
of the portal vein (PV), superior mesenteric vein (SMV), and splenic vein (SV)
trunk. Flow velocity (cm/s)and volume (ml/cardiac cycle) measurements were
performed blinded to subject status (fasting/meal). Intra-class correlation
coefficients (ICC) was used to check the consistency of the data measured by
the two observers. The flow velocity and volume for each vessel were compared
before and after the meal using paired t
test.Results
The consistency of the data obtained by the two observers were good (ICC
value > 0. 75). The APT values (MTRasym) of liver parenchyma was found not
change before and after a meal (P>0.05). After meal, significantly increased
blood flow velocity and volume were observed in PV and SMV, and significantly decreased
blood flow was observed in SV (P<0.05, Table 1).Discussion and Conclusions
We
have non-invasively measured the increase of flow velocity and volume in both
PV and SMV and the decrease in SV after the meal uptake in all the healthy
volunteers using 4D-flow MRI, indicating this technique a sensitive tool for
the quantification of portal system flow changes4. A varying range
of complicated abdominal and whole-body conditions may involve changes in
portal system flow, such as hepatic encephalopathy and hypersplenism, for which
4D-flow MRI can help to provide both diagnosis and therapy monitoring
information. Liver APT values were found not changing through the meal
challenge, likely because the protein synthesis metabolism takes a relatively
longer time. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1]. Zhou J, Heo
HY, Knutsson L, et al. APT-weighted MRI: Techniques, current neuro
applications, and challenging issues. J MagnReson Imaging. 2019; 50(2):347-364.
[2] Stankovic Z,
Csatari Z, Deibert P, et al. A feasibility study to evaluatesplanchnic arterial
and venous hemodynamics by flow-sensitive 4DMRI compared with Doppler ultrasound
in patients with cirrhosis andcontrols. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013, 25
(6):669-675.
[3] Stankovic Z,
Jung B, Collins J, et al. Reproducibility study of fourdimensionalflow MRI of
arterial and portal venous liver hemodynamics:Influence of spatio-temporal
resolution. Magn Reson Med. 2013, 72 (2):477-484.
[4] Roldán-Alzate
A, Frydrychowicz A, Said A, et al. Impaired Regulation of Portal VenousFlow in
Response to a Meal Challenge asQuantified by 4D Flow MRI. Magn Reson Imaging.
2015, 42(4):1009-1017.