Huaxia Pu1, Haoyao Cao2, Yubo Fan3, Jinge Zhang1, Zhenlin Li1, Zhan Liu2, Liqing Peng1, Tinghui Zheng2, Xiaoyue Zhou4, and Ning Jin5
1Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, 2Department of Applied Mechanics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, 3Key Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of the Ministry of Education, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China, 4MR Collaboration, Siemens Healthineers Ltd, Shanghai, China, 5Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Chicago, IL, United States
Synopsis
The existence of helical flow
in the superior vena cava (SVC) is not well understood in vivo. 4D flow
MRI data of the SVC and brachiocephalic veins (BVs) were acquired in 8 healthy
young males. SVC hemodynamic parameters, including velocity, pathlines,
streamlines, and flow waveforms, were measured using a specialized post-processing
software. Helical flow was present in the normal
SVC.
The flow pathlines from the right and left BVs formed helical flows,
respectively, with two development types: twining and untwining. These findings may elucidate the
occurrence and development of potential SVC disease.
Introduction
Helical flow has
significant effect on human blood circulation, and is prominent in arterial
circulation [1-4]. However, most
studies of venous flow patterns rely on hydrodynamic calculations, and clinical
reports related to the investigation of helical flow in the human venous system
are extremely rare. As shown with central vein computational
fluidics with catheter placement, flow status might be related to thrombus
formation in the superior vena cava (SVC)[5, 6]. In this study, we
aimed to investigate whether helical flow exists in the SVC of healthy young
males, and to describe the development and characteristics of this flow pattern
with 4D flow MRI.Methods
Eight healthy young males
(age: 25.1 ± 4.9 years) underwent MRI on a 3T MRI (MAGNETOM Skyra, Siemens
Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Data acquisition consisted of a prototype 4D
flow sequence with retrospective ECG gating covering the SVC and
brachiocephalic veins (BVs). Typical imaging parameters included:
isotropic voxels (1.8 mm×2.2 mm×1.8 mm), 3D field-of-view of 276 mm×340 mm (FH
x AP). TE = 2.69 - 2.79 ms, TR = 40.72 - 41.76 ms, α = 8⁰, velocity encoding = 80 cm/s, GRAPPA
acceleration factor = 3, Pixel bandwidth = 490 Hz, and approximate scan time = 19
min. Hemodynamic parameters in the SVC, including velocity, velocity vectors,
pathlines, streamlines, and flow waveforms, were obtained with a specialized
commercial post-processing software(cvi42, version
5.11.3; Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc., Calgary, Canada). Data were analyzed by two
experienced observers to interpret the flow pattern visually.Results
Figure 1 summarizes streamline visualization
results across all subjects in the cardiac diastole, while Figure 2 shows
velocity maps and streamlines chosen at 4 cardiac timepoints in two subjects. These
figures demonstrate that helical flow is present
in normal SVC flow, occurring in diastole. This phenomenon is mainly located at the upper
and middle segments of SVC. With decreased blood velocity, helical flow area
had the tendency of gradual extension. Flow pathlines originating from the left
and right BVs formed helical flows, respectively, and there were two
development types (Figure 3): twining (Type 1) and untwining (Type 2). Type 1 was observed in 5 cases (V2, 5-8), and
involved mutual entwining of BV pathlines. Type 2 was observed in the remaining
cases, and involved BV pathlines moving along the corresponding side of lumen
with nearly no interference.
SVC helical flow direction (Figure 4) was identified
as counter-clockwise (V1-3, 5-6, left-handed) or clockwise (V4,
7-8, right-handed). SVC flow velocity was lower in the center than at the periphery.
The SVC flow waveform was biphasic with some
cases having centrifugal diastolic blood flow. Except for V6, the first peak of SVC flow
was at cardiac time = 60.9 ± 28.5 ms (30 - 112 ms) later than peak
ascending aorta flow. The emergence period of helical flow was divided into
three periods corresponding to the 3 red sections in Figure 5E: initially
formed helical flow, matured helical flow, and disrupted helical flow. The two BV flow
waveforms were similar, but RBV flow rate was greater than that of LBV. In Type
1 helical flow, the difference between the peak flow of the two BVs was less
than that of the Type 2 (8.6 ± 5.8 mL/s vs.
25.9 ± 14.5 mL/s, p=0.08).Discussion
In this study, the helical flow of SVC mainly started
at the confluence of two BVs, which always appeared in pairs before gradually
converging. It is considered that this natural phenomenon is caused by the
mutual influence of both BVs. Aside from the peak flow difference of the two
BVs, no obvious differences were observed between Type 1 and Type 2 flow patterns.
Helical flow has high transport efficiency, which may help to improve the
venous return rate and avoid the reduction of cardiac output [7]. Helical flow has also been recognized to
inhibit blood flow disorders and instability [8, 9], which can prevent the development of chronic
venous diseases by inhibiting inflammation and thrombosis. In other words, the
loss of helical flow may mean an increased risk of diseases such as SVC
obstruction.Conclusion
SVC visualized helical flow in healthy young males
through 4D flow MRI might be a characteristic of normal physiological function
in this vessel. This phenomenon has the potential to be a reference for
predicting early SVC disease.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by
the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 81601462], 1·3·5
project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University
[ZYGD18013] and Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support plan [grant
number 2016FZ0107].References
[1] A. Frydrychowicz, J.T.
Winterer, M. Zaitsev, B. Jung, J. Hennig, M. Langer, M. Markl, Visualization of
iliac and proximal femoral artery hemodynamics using time-resolved 3D phase
contrast MRI at 3T, J Magn Reson Imaging 25(5) (2007) 1085-92.
[2] P.A. Stonebridge, P.R.
Hoskins, P.L. Allan, J.F. Belch, Spiral laminar flow in vivo, Clin Sci (Lond)
91(1) (1996) 17-21.
[3] M. Markl, M.T. Draney, M.D.
Hope, J.M. Levin, F.P. Chan, M.T. Alley, N.J. Pelc, R.J. Herfkens,
Time-resolved 3-dimensional velocity mapping in the thoracic aorta:
visualization of 3-directional blood flow patterns in healthy volunteers and
patients, J Comput Assist Tomogr 28(4) (2004) 459-68.
[4] M.S. Wetzel S, Frydrychowicz
A, Bonati L, Radue EW, Scheffler K, Hennig J, Markl M, In vivo assessment and
visualization of intracranial arterial hemodynamics with flow-sensitized 4D MR
imaging at 3T., American Journal of Neuroradiology 28(3) (2007) 433-438.
[5] L. Peng, Y. Qiu, Z. Huang, C.
Xia, C. Dai, T. Zheng, Z. Li, Numerical Simulation of Hemodynamic Changes in
Central Veins after Tunneled Cuffed Central Venous Catheter Placement in
Patients under Hemodialysis, Sci Rep 7(1) (2017) 15955.
[6] M. Park, Y. Qiu, H. Cao, Y.
Ding, D. Li, Y. Jiang, L. Peng, T. Zheng, Influence of Hemodialysis Catheter
Insertion on the Hemodynamics in the Central Veins, J Biomech Eng (2020).
[7] X. Liu, A. Sun, Y. Fan, X.
Deng, Physiological significance of helical flow in the arterial system and its
potential clinical applications, Ann Biomed Eng 43(1) (2015) 3-15.
[8] M. Brass, Z.C. Berwick, X.
Zhao, H. Chen, J. Krieger, S. Chambers, G.S. Kassab, Growth and remodeling of
canine common iliac vein in response to venous reflux and hypertension, J Vasc
Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 3(3) (2015) 303-311 e1.
[9] G. De Nisco, A. Hoogendoorn,
C. Chiastra, D. Gallo, A.M. Kok, U. Morbiducci, J.J. Wentzel, The impact of
helical flow on coronary atherosclerotic plaque development, Atherosclerosis
300 (2020) 39-46.