SAYAKA SHIRAI1, Tetsuro Sekine1, Kenichiro Takahashi1, Jiro Kurita1, Yosuke Ishii1, and Shinichiro Kumita1
1Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyoto Bunkyoku, Japan
Synopsis
To investigate whether turbulent kinetic energy measurement
around anastomosis can be used as a predictor for residual aortic expansion
after aortic replacement for type A aortic dissection. The TKEpeak
of AoR group was significantly higher than those of volunteers
(15.12 ± 7.06 [3.51–28.38] vs. 4.50 ± 1.64 [2.57–8.13] mJ,
p < 0.001). There was a strong correlation between the annual
expansion rate and distal TKEpeak (R²=0.818).
Introduntion
Recently, the long-term outcome for type A aortic dissection (AAD) has
been more discussed thanks to the improvement of short-term mortality after the
surgical treatment, aortic replacement (AoR) (1). According to previous
reports, 40% of AAD after AoR exhibit distal aortic expansion within 5 years, some
of whom require reoperation (2, 3). If we can predict morphological changes in these
patients, the management including surgical options would be improved.
It is generally accepted that
the abnormal vessel wall stress via turbulent flow induces the aortic expansion
(4). In previous reports, wall shear stress (WSS) has been mainly used as the marker
of this phenomenon (4). However, its value calculated from 4D Flow MRI is not accurate because it is sensitive to several factors such as spatial
resolution, vessel wall motion, and the boundary condition of the vessel wall. To
overcome these drawbacks, we expected that turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) can be
used as a surrogate marker for abnormal vessel wall stress. TKE is calculated from
the signal drop induced by the combination with bipolar gradient and turbulence
on magnitude images of 4D Flow MRI. Its concept is not the same but similar to diffusion-weighted
images. One of the advantages of TKE is that it is robust to the changes in spatial
resolution. The other is that we can measure its value with enough volume of
interest (VOI) (e.g. the whole intravascular regions of ascending aorta). Its
utility has been already validated in a few previous reports (5, 6).
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether TKE around the anastomosis can be used as a predictor for residual aortic expansion after AoR
for AAD. Method
Nippon Medical School Hospital’s ethics committee
approved this observational study (30-08-986). Informed consent was obtained
from all subjects.
Subjects;
From May 2018 to January 2020, we recruited 13
patients (56.5±12.3 years old, 10 males) who had undergone AoR for AAD and 9 normal volunteers (30.9±3.0 years
old, 6 males).
Imaging and reconstruction;
4D Flow MRI using a 3.0-T
MRI unit (Achieva; Philips Healthcare) was performed.
The parameters were as follows; TR/TE, ≈ 4.0 / 2.7ms; FA, 11 degrees; voxel
resolution, 1.7*1.7*2.0-2.0*2.0*2.5mm; multi-VENC acquisition, 50–100–300 cm/s;
heart phase, 15–21 depending on heart rate; prospective triggering; k-t PCA
acceleration factor, 5–7; free breath acquisition; and acquisition time 8–12 min. TKE was calculated from the
magnitude images of multi-VENC data combined with Bayesian estimation by using
offline reconstruction software (CRECON, Gyro Tools, Zurich, Switzerland).
Analysis;
GT Flow (GyroTools, Zurich, Switzerland) was used
for TKE quantification. The VOI from left ventricular to
aortic arch was drawn semi-automatically based on phase-contrast MRA imaging. TKEphase is calculated as
the sum of entire VOI at each cardiac phase. TKEpeak was the highest TKEphase
in the whole cardiac phase.
Statistical analysis;
First, TKEpeak was compared between AoR group and volunteers by using
Mann-Whitney U-test. Second, the TKE elevation on the caudal side from the
distal end of the graft was defined as the distal TKEpeak. The annual expansion
rate on the distal side of the graft was calculated for patients followed up
for 6 months or more after surgery. We investigated the correlation between the
annual expansion rate on the distal side of the graft and distal TKEpeak. In
all analyses, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All
statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 19.0.0 (IBM Corporation,
Armonk, NY, USA).Result
Out of 13 patients, 1 patient was excluded
because an electrocardiogram could not be acquired because of arrhythmia. Hence,
we evaluated 12 patients (59.5 ± 12.2 years old, 9 males) and 9
normal volunteers (30.9 ± 3.0 years old, 6 males). All of the acquired
data was listed in table 1. The representative case was illustrated in figure 1 and 2. The TKEpeak of AoR group was significantly higher than those of
volunteers (15.12 ± 7.06 [3.51–28.38] vs. 4.50 ± 1.64
[2.57–8.13] mJ, p < 0.001). There was a strong correlation between
the annual expansion rate of the distal aorta of the anastomosis and distal
TKEpeak (R²=0.818) (figure 3).Discussion
The current study revealed that accelerated jet
flow occurs at the distal side of anastomosis, leading to the elevation of TKE.
Its elevation is highly correlated to the annual expansion rate of residual
aortic expansion. Based on the result, we assume that TKE accurately reflects the
“turbulence” of the aorta. This turbulence causes abnormal WSS which inducing distal
aortic expansion. This hypothesis is based on several previous reports. First, TKE
correlates wall shear stress in the simulation study (7). If this correlation maintains
in vivo, TKE is more useful than WSS because it is robust to spatial resolution
and enough VOI can be drawn for the measurement. Second, it is suggested that TKE
elevation of AS correlates with aortic expansion (5). The limitation is that we only focused on TKE in
small patients. Therefore, further studies including the comprehensive analysis of other
flow parameters such as WSS in a larger cohort.Conclusion
After AoR for AAD, TKE calculated from
4D Flow MRI is significantly increased than volunteers. TKE can be used to
predict expansion on the distal side of the anastomosis. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.Emily Pan, et al. Low rate of reoperations
after acute type A aortic dissection repair from The Nordic Consortium
Registry. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018;156: 939-948.
2.Claudio F Russo, et al. Italian multicentre
study on type A acute aortic dissection: a 33-year follow-up. European Journal
of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 2015:125-131.
3.Zhengjun Wang, et al. Long-term outcomes
of survival and freedom from reoperation on the aortic root or valve after
surgery for acute ascending aorta dissection. The Journal of Thoracic and
Cardiovascular Surgery 2014:2117-2122.
4. Garcia J, et al. The Role of Imaging of
Flow Patterns by 4D Flow MRI in Aortic Stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging.
2019;12(2):252–266.
5. Christian Binter, et al. Turbulent Kinetic
Energy Assessed by Multipoint 4-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Provides Additional Information Relative to Echocardiography for the
Determination of Aortic Stenosis Severity. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; 10
6. Kotomi Iwata, et al. Four-dimensional flow
magnetic resonance imaging reveals the reduction in turbulent kinetic energy
after percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation in hypertrophic
obstructive cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J 2019
7. Magnus Ziegler, et al. Assessment of turbulent
flow effects on the vessel wall using four-dimensional flow MRI. Magn Reson
Med. 2017