Naila Rahman1,2, Kathy Xu2, Nico Arezza1,2, Kevin Borsos1,2, Matthew Budde3, Arthur Brown2,4, and Corey Baron1,2
1Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON, Canada, 2Robarts Research Institute, London, ON, Canada, 3Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States, 4Anatomy and Cell Biology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
Synopsis
Microstructural
diffusion MRI (dMRI) improves the specificity required to detect
microstructure changes related to pathophysiology. Oscillating
gradient spin-echo (OGSE) dMRI is sensitive to structural disorder
and microscopic anisotropy (µA) dMRI is sensitive to water diffusion
anisotropy independent of neuron fiber orientation. In this work,
OGSE and µA protocols were implemented to enable in
vivo longitudinal scanning at 9.4T.
Preliminary data in a rodent model of traumatic brain injury (TBI)
revealed changes in mean diffusivity dependence on OGSE frequency
post-TBI and changes in spherical tensor kurtosis (sensitive to cell
size heterogeneity), compared to healthy mice.
Introduction
Current
neuroimaging techniques lack the specificity required to reliably
detect signs of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI)1.
To enable the specificity required to track microstructure changes,
two advanced quantitative diffusion MRI scans (“Microstructural
dMRI”) that are sensitive to microstructure in complementary ways
can be applied: 1. Structural disorder via oscillating gradient spin
echo (OGSE) dMRI2
and 2. Cell shape via microscopic anisotropy (μA) dMRI3.
Here, we perform longitudinal imaging in a cohort of healthy mice and
compare to a rodent model of severe and repetitive mTBI. Importantly,
this is the first application of these advanced dMRI protocols in an
in vivo
rodent model of TBI.Methods
Imaging
was performed at 9.4T with a 1 T/m gradient insert using single-shot
EPI with an in-plane resolution of 0.175mm x 0.2mm, 0.5mm slice
thickness, and a total scan time of 2 hours. The OGSE sequence was
implemented with b=800s/mm2,
TE=37ms, 10 directions and OGSE frequencies of 0, 50, 100, 145, and
190 Hz. The µA sequence was implemented using a single diffusion
encoding (SDE) scheme3
with linear and spherical tensor encodings at b=2000s/mm2
(30 directions) and b=1000s/mm2
(12 directions).
Longitudinal imaging was performed on a cohort of 4 healthy female
C57Bl/6 mice at 10 weeks old (Day 0) and 12 weeks old (Day 14).
Post-processing included PCA denoising4
and eddy current correction with FSL5.
Parameters were measured in the corpus callosum (CC) and prefrontal
cortex (PFC).
Each
of a repetitive mTBI (5-mTBI) and severe TBI model (CHI-RF: cortical
head injury with rotational force) were implemented on separate male
C57Bl/6 mice (Fig1). Each of the 2 mice was imaged at baseline before
impact and again 48H after the final impact, then euthanized for
histology after imaging.Results
Healthy
mice: The dMRI metrics were characterized by a linear dependence on
the square root of OGSE frequency (Fig2a,b). Metrics from the μA
protocol showed general stability in all ROI's for the Day 0 and
Day 14 scans (Fig2c,d,e). A higher μA and KLIN
(linear diffusion kurtosis) is seen in the white matter (corpus
callosum) compared to the gray matter (PFC). Inter-subject
variabilities and mean differences between the two timepoints are
reported in Fig2f.
Preliminary
Data: Parameter maps acquired at baseline and 48H-post
CHI-RF are shown in Fig3. ΔMD (the difference in MD between the highest and lowest
frequencies) trends towards an increase following CHI-RF in both the
corpus callosum and PFC (Fig4a,b). In contrast, there were no clear
changes in ΔMD for 5-mTBI. KLIN
and KST
(spherical tensor diffusion kurtosis), which were calculated from the
μA protocol, trend towards a decrease 48H-post CHI-RF, and an
increase 48H-post 5-mTBI (Fig4d,e), while no notable change is seen
in μA (Fig4c).
Histology:
Silver staining revealed greater axon swelling/beading post 5-mTBI
compared to CHI-RF in the corpus callosum (Fig5a). GFAP and Iba-1
staining revealed greater microglial activation in the corpus
callosum and greater astrocyte reactivity in the PFC, for 5-mTBI
versus CHI-RF (Fig5b,c).Discussion
Healthy mice: The
linear dependence of dMRI metrics on the square root of OGSE
frequency (Fig2) is consistent with previous findings
in the healthy human brain6.
In
healthy mice, ΔMD values observed in the PFC (0.079 – 0.080
μm2/ms)
are comparable to a previous report of ΔMD in healthy mouse gray
matter (0.070 – 0.080 μm2/ms)7.
Imaging in healthy mice revealed that trends with frequency were
highly repeatable in the PFC and corpus callosum. The variation in AD
(axial diffusivity) and FA (fractional anisotropy) over the two-week
period is similar to variation in control groups of mice in other
longitudinal studies8.
Linear
and spherical tensor kurtosis: The increase in KLIN
for 5-mTBI is consistent with histological results of more
inflammation in this model and with a previous finding in a rodent
model, where the increase in KLIN
was associated with increased reactive astrolgiosis9.
Infiltration of activated microglia and axon beading both contribute
to heterogeneity, which may have led to the increase in KST
48H-post 5-mTBI. The opposing kurtosis trends between the two models
suggest a sensitivity
to either severity or timing after an initial impact.
MD
dependence on OGSE frequency: Silver staining revealed axon
swelling/beading for both models compared to sham, with more
pronounced axon swelling/beading for 5-mTBI. The increase in ΔMD for
CHI-RF is consistent with expectations from neurite beading10.
The lack of a similar observation for the 5-mTBI model, where there
is more beading and substantially more inflammation than for CHI-RF,
suggests that beading and inflammation might affect OGSE contrast in
opposing ways. The decrease in MD for the 5-mTBI model, in contrast
to trends in the healthy mice cohort and CHI-RF model, is consistent
with previous studies where a decrease in MD in the acute stage after
TBI is associated with inflammation and axonal injury11–13.
While only one mouse was studied for each TBI
case in this preliminary study, the changes between baseline and
post-TBI in
ΔMD (in CHI-RF), KLIN,
and KST
are larger
than both the inter-subject variabilities and mean differences
between timepoints in healthy mice, which is suggestive that these
changes may reflect pathological change. Continuing work will study
these changes in a larger cohort of subjects.Acknowledgements
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
Canada First Research Excellence Fund to BrainsCAN
New Frontiers in Research Fund (NFRF)
References
1. Giza CC,
Hovda DA. The Neurometabolic Cascade of Concussion. J
Athl Train.
2001;36(3):228-235.
2. Baron
CA, Beaulieu C. Oscillating gradient spin-echo (OGSE) diffusion
tensor imaging of the human brain. Magn
Reson Med.
2014;72(3):726-736. doi:10.1002/mrm.2498.
3. Arezza
NJJ, Tse DHY, Baron CA. Rapid Microscopic Fractional Anisotropy
Imaging via an Optimized Kurtosis Formulation. medRxiv.
2020.
4. Veraart
J, Novikov DS, Christiaens D, Ades-aron B, Sijbers J, Fieremans E.
Denoising of diffusion MRI using random matrix theory. Neuroimage.
2016;142:394-406. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.01.
5.
Andersson JLR, Sotiropoulos SN. An integrated approach to correction
for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion MR
imaging. Neuroimage.
2016;125:1063-1078. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.01.
6. Arbabi
A, Kai J, Khan AR, Baron CA. Diffusion dispersion imaging: Mapping
oscillating gradient spin-echo frequency dependence in the human
brain. Magn
Reson Med.
2020;83(6):2197-2208. doi:10.1002/mrm.2808.
7. Wu D,
Martin LJ, Northington FJ, Zhang J. Oscillating gradient diffusion
MRI reveals unique microstructural information in normal and
hypoxia-ischemia injured mouse brains. Magn
Reson Med.
2014;72(5):1366-1374. doi:10.1002/mrm.2544.
8. Yu F,
Shukla DK, Armstrong RC, et al. Repetitive Model of Mild Traumatic
Brain Injury Produces Cortical Abnormalities Detectable by Magnetic
Resonance Diffusion Imaging, Histopathology, and Behavior. J
Neurotrauma.
2017;34(7):1364-1381. doi:10.1089/neu.2016.456.
9. Zhuo J,
Xu S, Hazelton J, Mullins R, Simon J. Diffusion Kurtosis as an In
Vivo Imaging Marker for Reactive Astrogliosis in Traumatic Brain
Injury. Neuroimage.
2012;59(1):467-477. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.050.Diffusion.
10. Baron
CA lla., Kate M, Gioia L, et al. Reduction of Diffusion-Weighted
Imaging Contrast of Acute Ischemic Stroke at Short Diffusion Times.
Stroke.
2015;46(8):2136-2141. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.00881.
11. Mac
Donald CL, Dikranian K, Bayly P, Holtzman D, Brody D. Diffusion
tensor imaging reliably detects experimental traumatic axonal injury
and indicates approximate time of injury. J
Neurosci.
2007;27(44):11869-11876. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3647-07.2007.
12. van de
Looij Y, Mauconduit F, Beaumont M, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of
diffuse axonal injury in a rat brain trauma model. NMR
Biomed.
2012;25(1):93-103. doi:10.1002/nbm.1721.
13.
Molina ISM, Salo RA, Abdollahzadeh A, Tohka J, Gröhn O, Sierra A. In
vivo diffusion tensor imaging in acute and subacute phases of mild
traumatic brain injury in rats. eNeuro.
2020;7(3):1-18. doi:10.1523/ENEURO.0476-19.2020.