Yuan Lian1, Xinyu Ye1, Yajing Zhang2, and Hua Guo1
1Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 2MR Clinical Science, Philips Healthcare, Suzhou, China
Synopsis
Compressed Sensing theory is often applied
to accelerate the acquisition of multi-contrast MR images. When highly undersampled,
CS-MRI suffers from non-negligible reconstruction error. Here we propose an
unrolled iterative deep-learning model to further utilize the group sparsity property
for multi-contrast MRI reconstruction at high acceleration factor, named Joint-ISTA-Net,
to reduce reconstruction error and aliasing. Our method adds a
joint-shrinkage-thresholding model into ISTA-Net to generate a better
reconstruction for multi-contrast image pairs. Experiments show the effectiveness of the proposed strategy.
Introduction
Since multi-contrast MR images provide
abundant diagnostic information, a typical MRI protocol usually includes
sequences that acquire images of the same anatomical structure, which may be
time-consuming. To accelerate MRI acquisition, Compressed Sensing, a strategy
that acquires down-sampled k-space data
and reconstructs images utilizing image sparsity, is
usually applied[1].
Recently, deep learning has been
introduced to CS-MRI reconstruction, and Model-driven deep learning networks including
ISTA-Net[2] and Admm-Net[3] have shown great success, giving a better reconstruction
result for highly undersampled kspace data compared with traditional method.
In addition, multi-contrast MR images sharing
similar structures can increase image sparsity jointly. Thus, reconstructing
multi-contrast down-sampled MR images via group sparsity property is supposed to
be efficient, and has been proved to be
more powerful than reconstructing each contrast individually[4,5,6].
Inspired by this, we extend the ISTA-Net network by introducing a
Joint-shrinkage-thresholding model to utilize group sparsity information, and propose
a Joint-ISTA-Net. Theory
Traditionally
a compressed sensing reconstruction problem is regarded as a constrained
optimization problem, which can be written as
$$ \underset m{\text{min}}\left\|Am-y\right\|_2^2+{\lambda\left\|\psi m\right\|}_1 $$
Where $$$A$$$ denotes
encoding matrix, $$$y$$$ denotes
acquired down-sampled kspace data, $$$\psi$$$ denotes
sparse transform such as wavelet or total variation, and $$$m$$$ is
the image to be reconstructed. In deep learning model ISTA-Net, a general
nonlinear transform function $$$G$$$ with learnable parameters is adopted to replace the original sparse
transform, changing the model into
$$ \underset m{\text{min}}\left\|Am-y\right\|_2^2+{\lambda\left\|G\left(m\right)\right\|}_1 $$
Here
we introduce the traditional group sparsity concept[5-6] into the
model above. Group sparsity of multi-contrast image $$$m^{(i)}$$$ with sparse transform $$$\psi$$$ is
$$G_{SP}\left(m\right)={\lambda\left\|\psi m\right\|}_1$$
Replace sparse transform $$$\psi$$$ with nonlinear transform function $$$G$$$, then
the reconstruction model is
$$ \underset m{\text{min}}\left\|Am-y\right\|_2^2+{\lambda\left\|G\left(m\right)\right\|}_1+G_{SP}\left(m\right) $$
Which equals
$$ \underset m{\text{min}}\left\|Am-y\right\|_2^2+{\lambda\left\|G\left(m\right)\right\|}_1+\lambda{\left\|\sqrt{\sum_i\left(G\left(m^{(i)}\right)\right)^2}\right\|}_1 $$
Therefore the total iterative solution of
the Group-Sparsity model would be
$$ r^{\left(n+1,i\right)}=m^{(n,i)}-\rho^{(n,i)}A^T\left(Am^{(n,i)}-y\right) $$
$$ m^{(n+1,i)}=\widetilde G((1-\mu^{(n,i)})soft(G(r^{(n+1,i)}),\theta^{(n,i)})+\mu^{(n,i)}soft(\sqrt{\sum_i(G{(r^{(n+1,i)}))}^2},\theta_J^{(n)})) $$
Where $$$n$$$ is the iteration step. Here, forward transform $$$G$$$ and
back transform $$$\widetilde G$$$, together with step size $$$\rho^{(n,i)}$$$
, soft threshold $$$\theta^{(n,i)}$$$
, joint soft threshold $$$\theta_J^{(n)}$$$ and
sum weights $$$\mu^{(n,i)}$$$ are
learnable during the training process.Method
A Joint-ISTA-Net is designed to learn the parameters mentioned above, and its
structure is shown in Fig. 1. The network is trained on public dataset IXI[7]. T2 and PD weighted data are used jointly as
multi-contrast MR images dataset for training and testing. 1878 pairs of 2D
multi-contrast fully-sampled slices of brain from 15 subjects are chosen as train dataset,
and are undersampled using 2D Variable Density Poisson disk sampling mask.
After training we test the network on 5 subjects, 650 pairs of 2D
multi-contrast slices. Peak Signal
to Noise Ratio(PSNR) and Structural Similarity(SSIM) is used to demonstrate the
method’s capability.
We also implement ISTA-Net trained on single contrast, and other deep learning multi-contrast CS-MRI reconstruction methods including Deep Information Sharing
Network(DISN)[8] and X-Net model reconstructing multi-contrast
images based on U-Net[9], for comparison. In addition, a traditional multi-contrast
CS-MRI reconstruction method FCSA-MT[5] is tested. ISTA-Net and Joint-ISTA-Net are trained using a combination of Multiscale-Structural Similarity (MSSIM) and $$$L_1$$$ as the loss function:
$$LOSS=\alpha MSSIM(t,x)+(1-\alpha){\left\|t-x\right\|}_1$$
Where $$$t$$$ denotes target image, $$$x$$$ denotes reconstructed image, $$$\alpha=0.84$$$. Other
networks are trained using the loss functions proposed in references[8,9].
Furthermore, an extra experiment takes T2-weighted
images with a high acceleration factor (R=15) and PD-weighted images with a low
acceleration factor (R=8) as input, to illustrate whether contrast with a low
acceleration factor could further benefit the reconstruction quality of other
contrasts with a high acceleration factor using Joint-ISTA-Net. We expect that with help of other contrast, highly undersampled MR images can be reconstructed as the same quality of MR images under low acceleration factor. Therefore, efficiency can be
improved for clinical practice.Results
Figure 2 shows the results with
zoom-in images from the methods of FCSA-MT, X-Net, DISN, ISTA-Net and
Joint-ISTA-Net on test dataset. Both train dataset and test dataset are undersampled
using the same 10X Poisson disk sampling mask. Among the results Joint-ISTA-Net
shows an advantage in reducing reconstruction error and showing shaper edges. Figure
3 shows the average PSNR and SSIM of DISN, ISTA-Net and Joint-ISTA-Net, demonstrating that proposed Joint-ISTA-Net outperform
other methods.
A T2 weighted image with acceleration factor R=15
is reconstructed jointly with PD weighted image of same structure under R=8
using Joint-ISTA-Net, to show the result of jointly reconstruct slightly
undersampled image with highly undersampled image. Figure 4 shows the results, where jointly reconstruction shows better reconstruction
quality compared with the single-contrast reconstruction
result using ISTA-Net, and has little difference compared to slightly undersampled result(T2w, R=8). Discussion and Conclusion
In this work, we develop an effective deep
learning CS-MRI reconstruction model Joint-ISTA-Net, which exploits the group
sparsity property of multi-contrast MR images to generate better reconstruction
results. Experiments shows the capability of proposed method.
We also show that Joint-ISTA-Net can
promote reconstruction quality of images under high acceleration factors with
images under relatively low acceleration factor of different contrast. Thus,
protocols including acquisition of one contrast under a
low acceleration factor and other highly undersampled contrasts can be implemented
and therefore shorten the acquisition time.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.
Lustig,
Michael, David Donoho, and John M. Pauly. "Sparse MRI: The application of
compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging." Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine: An Official Journal of the International Society for Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine 58.6 (2007): 1182-1195.
2.
Zhang,
Jian, and Bernard Ghanem. "ISTA-Net: Interpretable optimization-inspired
deep network for image compressive sensing." Proceedings of the
IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2018.
3. Sun, Jian, Huibin Li, and Zongben Xu.
"Deep ADMM-Net for compressive sensing MRI." Advances in
neural information processing systems. 2016.
4.
Ji, Shihao,
Ya Xue, and Lawrence Carin. "Bayesian compressive sensing." IEEE
Transactions on signal processing 56.6 (2008): 2346-2356.
5.
Huang,
Junzhou, Chen Chen, and Leon Axel. "Fast multi-contrast MRI reconstruction." Magnetic
resonance imaging 32.10 (2014): 1344-1352.
6.
Kopanoglu,
Emre, et al. "Simultaneous use of individual and joint regularization
terms in compressive sensing: Joint reconstruction of multi‐channel
multi‐contrast MRI acquisitions." NMR in Biomedicine 33.4 (2020): e4247.
7. http://brain-development.org/ixi-dataset/
8. Sun, Liyan, et al. "A deep information
sharing network for multi-contrast compressed sensing MRI
reconstruction." IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 28.12
(2019): 6141-6153.
9. Do, Won‐Joon, et al. "Reconstruction of
multicontrast MR images through deep learning." Medical Physics 47.3
(2020): 983-997.