Xiangliang Tan1, Kan Deng2, Yingjie Mei2, Tianjing Zhang2, Yang Song3, Qiaoli Yao1, and Yikai Xu1
1Medical Imaging Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China, 2Philips Healthcare, Guangzhou, China, 3Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
Synopsis
The
present study tried to use radiomics models to find the neuroanatomical
biomarkers that can improve diagnosis in distinguishing non-neuropsychiatric Systemic Lupus
Erythematosus (non-NPSLE) patients from
controls. The results demonstrate that the grey matter volume
parameter is an effective classification feature for the radiomics models to
identify non-NPSLE patients from HC subjects. This classification performance
may suggest that the proposed method is a promising approach for improving the
clinical diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus.
Background
Systemic
lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune connective tissue disease with
unknown pathogenesis that affects the central nervous system [1]. Previous studies
have analyzed brain morphometry difference between non-neuropsychiatric
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (non-NPSLE) patients and healthy controls, highlighting
the need for early evaluation and intervention in SLE patients [2,3]. To the best of our
knowledge, no study ever applied pattern classification to discriminate non-NPSLE
patients from healthy controls based on the brain grey matter volume
properties. Therefore, the present study tried to use radiomics models to find
the neuroanatomical biomarkers that can improve diagnosis in distinguishing
non-NPSLE patients from controls.Materials and Methods
Forty-four female patients with non-NPSLE (30.1±1.5
years) and twenty-seven age- and gender- matched healthy
subjects (30.9±1.8 years) were enrolled in this study. All structural images were
scanned on a 3.0 T scanner (Achieva TX; Philips Healthcare, Best, the
Netherlands) using an 8-channel head coil for signal reception. Images were
processed using VBM8 toolbox in SPM8, and a threshold of FDR corrected
P<0.05 for a significant cluster was set to identify group differences in grey
matter volume. Then the volumes of clusters with statistical significance were imported
in the FeAture Explorer (FAE, a tool for developing and comparing radiomics
models) [4] for further analysis. The dataset was randomly split
into a training dataset and an independent test dataset with a weight ratio of
approximately 7:3, and the first-order statistic features
were extracted. We balanced the training dataset by upsamping technique and
normalized the dataset by mean normalization. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Pearson correlation coefficient were used to reduce the
number of features and prevent overfitting. Three
different classifiers (support vector machine (SVM), linear discriminant
analysis (LDA), Logistic regression(LR)) were
performed to distinguish patients with non-NPSLE from healthy controls. Furthermore,
the leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) was adopted to generate accuracy
values. The performance of the
classification models was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating
characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC).Results
Compared to healthy controls, the non-NPSLE
group showed grey matter volume decrease in the temporal gyrus, gyrus rectus, medial orbitofrontal gyrus,
insula, thalamus, postcentral gyrus, median cingulate and paracingulate gyri, postcentral gyrus
and precuneus (Figure1 and Table1). While no grey
matter volume increased was found in the non-NPSLE group compared to healthy
controls. Using the radiomics models, we found that three classifiers
achieved the same classification performance with accuracy of 0.95, specificity
of 0.92 and sensitivity of 1. The AUC of three classifiers was 0.99 (Figure 2).Conclusion
The grey matter volume
parameter is an effective classification feature for the radiomics models to
identify non-NPSLE patients from HC subjects. This classification performance
may suggest that the proposed method is a promising approach for improving the
clinical diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Jeltsch-David H &
Muller S. Neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus: pathogenesis and
biomarkers. Nat Rev Neurol 2014;10:579-596.
[2] Niu C, Tan X, Liu X,
Han K, Niu M, Xu J, Zhao L, Wu Y, Deng F, Huang Q (2018) Cortical thickness
reductions associate with abnormal resting-state functional connectivity in
non-neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Brain imaging and behavior
12 (3):674-684
[3] Xu, J., et al., Autoantibodies
Affect Brain Density Reduction in Nonneuropsychiatric Systemic Lupus
Erythematosus Patients. J Immunol Res, 2015. 2015: p. 920718.
[4] Song, Yang; Zhang,
Jing; Zhang, Yu-dong; Hou, Ying; Yan, Xu; Wang, Yida; Zhou, Minxiong; Yao,
Ye-feng; Yang, Guang; Dimitriadis, Stavros I. (2020). FeAture Explorer
(FAE): A tool for developing and comparing radiomics models. PLOS ONE, 15(8),
e0237587–. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237587