Yunyun Jiao1, Jie Gong1, Hui Deng1, Dongchen Sun1, and Wei Qin1
1Engineering Research Center of Molecular and Neuro Imaging of the Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, China
Synopsis
We aimed to explore the relationship between the
pre-treatment temporal
variability of resting state functional connectivity and response to electroconvulsive
therapy (ECT) in schizophrenia (SZ). Statistical analysis included grouping
comparison and Pearson correlation analysis. The grouping comparison of temporal
variability between responders to ECT with SZ, non-responders to ECT with SZ and
healthy controls were conducted and Pearson correlation analysis was used to reveal
the relationship between temporal variability and the response to ECT. The
result showed that the temporal variability may serve as
a promising indicator to predict the response to ECT in patients with SZ.
Introduction
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), causing loss of
consciousness and seizures, could treat disease by passing an amount of
electric current through the brain. Because of its rapid effect and outstanding
efficacy, it has been used in the therapy of schizophrenia (SZ)1,2.However,significant individual differences were shown in the ECT response of SZ
patients, which were partly caused by the trait-like differences in brain
function and structure among patients. Therefore, it is necessary to explore
neurobiological indicators that have the potential to predict the ECT response in
SZ. Recent
research has revealed that, compared with healthy controls, >20% of brain regions of patients with schizophrenia showed
significant differences in temporal variability3.The abnormal pattern of temporal variability in SZ
may be related to and predict the efficacy of ECT. Thus,
we explored the relationship between pre-treatment temporal variability and ECT response, which may provide
a potential indicator for predicting the response to ECT in patients with SZ. Methods
Forty-eight SZ patients with ECT indications and
30 matched healthy controls (HC) underwent clinical evaluation and resting
state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI) at baseline. After 4
weeks of ECT treatment, the patients were divided into the responders of
schizophrenia (RS, n=23) and non-responders of schizophrenia(NRS, n=25), according
to the reduction of positive
and negative syndrome scale (ΔPANSS). The temporal variability of anatomical automatic
labeling (AAL) atlas-based 90 brain regions was
calculated for further analysis. Statistical analysis
included grouping comparison and Pearson correlation analysis. The grouping
comparison of temporal variability between RS, NRS and HC were conducted and
Pearson correlation analysis was used to reveal the relationship between temporal
variability and ΔPANSS (Figure
1).Results and discussion
The temporal variability patterns of RS and NRS
subgroups were different in the right inferior frontal gyrus, triangular par (IFGtriang.R), left temporal pole,superior temporal gyrus
(TPOsup.L) and right middle temporal gyrus (MTG.R). Compared with NRS group and HC group, the
variability of IFGtriang.R in
RS group was significantly decreased (P < 0.05), and was negatively
correlated with ΔPANSS (r = -0.3899, P = 0.0062,Figure 2A). IFG
is located in the lateral part of frontal lobe, and its main function is
related to language processing, especially semantic processing. The results
showed that frontal lobe dysfunction might be the neural basis of SZ, which may
affect the efficacy of ECT. The variability of TPOsup.L and MTG.R in NRS
group was significantly lower than that in RS group and HC group (P < 0.05),
and was positively correlated with ΔPANSS (r = 0.3507, P =
0.0145; r = 0.4333, P = 0.0021,Figure 2B,2C). This suggested that the baseline
activity of temporal lobe was related to the efficacy of
ECT. The results showed that the temporal variability was a key index to
predict the efficacy of ECT in patients
with SZ.Conclusion
Different patterns of temporal variability of
resting state functional connectivity may serve as a
promising indicator for predicting the response to ECT in in
patients with SZ.Acknowledgements
This study was supported by Xidian University.References
1.Kellner CH, Obbels J, Sienaert P. When to consider electroconvulsive
therapy (ECT). Acta Psychiatr Scand 2019.
2.Xiang YT, Ungvari GS, Correll CU, Chiu HF, Lai
KY, Wang CY, et al. Use of electroconvulsive therapy for Asian patients with
schizophrenia (2001-2009): Trends and correlates. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci
2015;69(8):489-96.
3.Zhang J, Cheng W, Liu Z, Zhang K, Lei X, Yao Y,
et al. Neural, electrophysiological and anatomical basis of brain-network
variability and its characteristic changes in mental disorders. Brain
2016;139(Pt 8):2307-21.