Maoxue Wang1, Yi Wang1, Yongbo Yang1, Yongbo Yang1, Ming Li1, Jilei Zhang1, and Bing Zhang1,2
1The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China, 2Institute of Brain Science, Nanjing University Nanjing, Nanjing, China
Synopsis
A comparison of 4D MRA and 3D TOF MRA in patients with moyamoya vasculopathy after revascularization.
introduction
Revascularization
is a common treatment strategy in patients with intra-extracranial symptomatic
arterial occlusive disease1. Conventional digital subtraction
angiography (DSA) is the gold standard reference for evaluating patients with
intracranial vasculopathy and is an invasive technique. Four-dimensional (4D) MR
angiography (MRA) based on pseudocontinuous ASL (pCASL) combined with the
keyhole and view-sharing techniques (4D-PACK) as a nonenhanced method provides better
visualization of peripheral arteries compared with dynamic contrast-enhanced
MRA in patients with moyamoya disease not treated by surgery2, 3. This
study aimed to assess and compare the visualization of bypass patency and
intracranial collaterals from the external carotid artery (ECA) by 4D-sPACK versus
3D time-of-flight MRA (3D TOF MRA) in patients with extra-intracranial
revascularization. DSA was used as a reference.Methods
The
MRI data of 23 patients who underwent bypass surgery were collected on an
Ingenia 3.0T CX scanner (Philips Healthcare, the Netherlands). The image
quality of 4D-sPACK was evaluated using a 4-point grading system. Patency of
anastomosis was assessed on 4D-sPACK and 3D TOF MRA images using DSA as the gold
standard. Visualization of intracranial collateral vessels was assessed with another
4-point grading by two radiologists on the images of 4D-sPACK and 3D TOF MRA
using DSA as the reference. The interobserver agreement of intracranial vessel
visualization scores was assessed with the weighted kappa statistic.results
Twenty-seven
hemispheres of 22 patients (9 male, age 44 ± 11.72 years) with occlusive
intracranial vascular disease were included in the study. The 4D-sPACK images were
successfully obtained in 24 (24/27, 88.89%) hemispheres with a higher sensitivity
compared with 3D TOF MRA (95.65% vs 78.26%) for visualizing anastomoses. Significant
differences were found between 4D-sPACK (scores, 3.10 ± 1.20) and 3D TOF MRA (scores,
1.67 ± 0.62) in the visualization of intracranial collaterals from the ECA obtained
using DSA as a reference (P < 0.001).
The interobserver agreement for intracranial collateral assessment was almost
substantial for 4D-sPACK (kappa = 0. 719) and 3D TOF MRA (kappa = 0.801).conclusion
The 4D-sPACK provided better performance than 3D TOF
MRA in the treatment evaluation of patients after bypass surgery, and it had
high consistency with DSA. Hence, 4D-sPACK could serve as a novel noninvasive
method to visualize flow dynamics when labeling the ECA and to evaluate the patency
of anastomoses and intracranial collaterals in patients with bypass surgery.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural
Science Foundation of China (81720108022 B.Z., 81971596, X.Z., 82071904, Z.Q.);
Supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities,
Nanjing University (2020-021414380462); The key project of Jiangsu Commission
of Health (K2019025); Key medical talents of the Jiangsu province, the
"13th Five-Year" health promotion project of the Jiangsu province
(ZDRCA2016064); Jiangsu Provincial Key Medical Discipline (Laboratory)
(ZDXKA2016020); the project of the sixth peak of talented people (WSN -138).References
1.
Kim T, Oh CW, Bang JS, et al. Moyamoya
disease: treatment and outcomes. J Stroke. 2016. 18(1):21-30.
2.
Obara M, Togao O, Beck GM, et al. Non-contrast enhanced 4D
intracranial MR angiography based on pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling
with the keyhole and view-sharing technique. Magn Reson Med. 2018.80(2):719-725.
3.
Togao O, Hiwatashi A, Obara M,
et al. 4D ASL-based MR angiography for visualization of distal arteries and
leptomeningeal collateral vessels in moyamoya disease: a comparison of
techniques. Eur Radiol. 2018. 28(11):4871-4881.