Tongtong Sun1, Yu Zhang1, Tongtong Li1, Yuan Luo2, Jinxia Zhu3, Cheng Cheng4, and Hongyan Ni5
1Radiology, First Central Clinical College, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China, 2Radiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China, 3MR Collaboration, Siemens Healthcare, Beijing, China, 4MR Application, Siemens Healthcare, Beijing, China, 5Radiology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
Synopsis
This study compared the differences between
PETRA-MRA and TOF-MRA on the imaging of the cavernous segment of the ICA with
qualitative analysis (image quality) and quantitative analysis (SNR, CNR, CR,
and uniformity). The results showed that PETRA-MRA significantly improved the
uniformity and CR of the cavernous segment of ICA, although it is inferior in
both SNR and CNR. This suggests that PETRA-MRA could provide a reasonable alternative to
reduce the loss of signal from curved vessels.
Purpose
To assess
the clinical value in the imaging of cavernous segment of internal carotid
artery (ICA) between two magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) techniques,
time-of-flight (TOF) and pointwise encoding time reduction with radial
acquisition (PETRA).Methods
The study
cohort included 37 healthy subjects who underwent both PETRA-MRA and TOF-MRA on
a 3T system (MAGNETOM Prisma, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). PETRA-MRA was obtained by acquiring the labeled and
the control data. A slice-selective
saturation pulse was applied upstream to the carotid artery, which had the
potential to darken the arterial inflow. The saturation pulse was also adopted
in the control data and was only prescribed outside of the imaging volume for
the MT effects while not interfering with the imaging volume. Then, these two
data sets were subtracted to generate arterial MRA with background tissue and
venous flow suppressed. We fixed the head by filling the coil with sponge to
avoid the pixel dislocation caused by head displacement.
The acquisition parameters of
both MRA sequences were as follow. TOF-MRA: TR=21 ms; TE=3.69 ms; voxel size=0.5×0.5×0.8mm3; FOV=200×174mm2; 4 slabs; 44 slices per slab; flip angle=20°; bandwidth=186 Hz/Px; parallel acceleration factor=2 ; acquisition
time=5 min 28 s. PETRA-MRA: TR=3.31 ms; TE=0.07 ms; Radial views=45,000; voxel
size=1×1×1mm3; FOV=250×250mm2; 1 slab; 256 slices per slab; flip angle=3°; bandwidth=403 Hz/Px; total acquisition time for the labeled and
the control data=6min 52s.
Two
neuroradiologists reviewed the images blindly and evaluated the image quality
about delineation of the cavernous segment of ICA on a
5-point scale independently. Quantitative measurements of signal-to-noise ratio
(SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), contrast ratio (CR), and uniformity were
also performed. Weighted KAPPA (for grading of image quality) and intraclass
correlation coefficient (ICC, for quantitative measurements) were used to
assess inter-reader agreement. Wilcoxon signed-rank
tests were used to identify the difference between these two MRA images. GraphPad
Prism (version 8.0; GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and SPSS
(version 23.0, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) were used for all analyses. A
P-value less than 0.05 indicated statistical significance.Results
The mean
score for delineation of the cavernous segment of the ICA was significantly
higher in PETRA-MRA than in TOF-MRA (P< .001 for both readers), and good
inter-reader agreement was reported. For the SNR and CNR, TOF-MRA was
significantly better than PETRA-MRA, but CR and uniformity of PETRA-MRA were
significantly higher than of TOF-MRA (P< .001 for both readers). The results
are shown in Fig.1. The inter-reader agreement was excellent (SNR of TOF-MRA
and PETRA-MRA, CNR of TOF-MRA, CR of TOF-MRA and PETRA-MRA) or good (CNR of
PETRA-MRA, uniformity of TOF-MRA and PETRA-MRA). Higher uniformity of the cavernous
segment of the ICA on PETRA-MRA images compared to TOF-MRA images is also shown
in Fig.2.Discussion
TOF-MRA
uses the blood flow–related enhancement of unsaturated spins entering into an
imaging slice as means to generate a contrast between the stationary tissue and
the moving blood [1]. PETRA-MRA is based on the
principle of ASL strategy, which involves arterial blood signal with high
intensity in control images, and negative or small blood signal in labeled
images, the difference between these two states constituting arterial blood
signal and background suppression in the subtracted angiographic image [2]. Therefore,
TOF-MRA is sensitive to flow with diminution of velocity, which remains in the
imaging volume for a long time and is repeatedly stimulated by RF pulses,
resulting in saturation effect and signal attenuation or loss [3-5]. In PETRA-MRA,
arterial signal intensity depends more on the longitudinal relaxation time of
the labeled spins and signal acquisition time than on the vessel curvature and
flow status. Although PETRA-MRA was inferior in both the SNR and CNR, it demonstrated
better contrast and uniformity in delineation of the cavernous segment of the ICA
compared to TOF-MRA. Conclusions
In conclusion, PETRA-MRA showed promising
image quality without dephasing and saturation artifact, as well as better
background suppression. And it can be used to improve the certainty of
diagnosis.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Bosmans H, Marchal G, Lukito G, et al. Time-of-flight
MR angiography of the brain: comparison of acquisition techniques in healthy
volunteers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164(1):161-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.164.1.7998531
2. Suzuki Y, Fujima N, van Osch MJP. Intracranial 3D
and 4D MR Angiography Using Arterial Spin Labeling: Technical Considerations. Magn
Reson Med Sci 2019 Nov 22. [Epub ahead of print]
3. Wilcock DJ, Jaspan T, Worthington BS. Problems and
pitfalls of 3-D TOF magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial
circulation. Clin Radiol 1995; 50(8):526-532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-9260(05)83186-1
4. Oshinski JN, Ku DN, Pettigrew RI. Turbulent
fluctuation velocity: the most significant determinant of signal loss in
stenotic vessels. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33(2):193-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910330208
5. Furst G, Hofer M, Sitzer M, et al. Factors
influencing flow-induced signal loss in MR angiography: an in vitro study. J
Comput Assist Tomogr 1995; 19(5):692-699. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-199509000-00002