Yosuke Otake1, Takeshi Taniguchi1, Hideta Habara1, Christophor Napier2, Errol Brissett2, Shawn Etheridge2, Masayoshi Dohata1, and Kazuyuki Kato1
1Healthcare Business Unit, Hitachi, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan, 2Hitachi Healthcare Americas, Twinsburg, OH, United States
Synopsis
To improving the SNR and the usability in the vertical field MRI(Open MRI), a flexible
body(spine/torso) coil has been developed. The coil consists of loop/CRC hybrid
multi-channel array (LCA). The performance of the coil was evaluated in phantom
experiment at 1.2T vertical field MRI. The SNR of the coil using LCA was 46%
better than a conventional body coil. This technique will
contribute to improve the performance of the vertical field MRI.
Introduction
A multi-channel RF-array coil obtains high SNR by arranging the coils
in high density on the surface of the subject [1-3]. In horizontal field MRI, multi channelization has
progressed rapidly because loop coils can be placed freely on the surface of
the subject. On the other hand, in vertical field MRI(Open MRI), multi channelization has
not progressed so far because the placement of the loop coils having much
sensitivity are limited and they could not be placed freely [4]. Therefore, it
was considered that the loop coil could not be arranged at high density, and a
large solenoid coil surrounding the subject which has high sensitivity in the
deep object region was used instead. However, the array coils using the
solenoid coils cannot change their shape easily, that is the cause of reduced SNR
and usability. To alleviate this problem, we have developed a loop/CRC (Counter
Rotating Current) hybrid multi-channel array (LCA) RF coil and body (spine/torso)
coil using LCA for 1.2T vertical field MRI.
Methods
The basic configuration of the developed LCA coil is shown in Fig. 1
(a). The LCA consists of four loop coils and a CRC coil that compensates for
the lack of sensitivity of loop coils. In vertical field MRI, the loop coil was
considered to have poor sensitivity because there is a region where sensitivity
cannot be obtained depending on the orientation of the coil (Fig. 2(c)). However,
we found by RF coil simulator [5] that the total sensitivity of loop coils in
vertical and horizontal MRI were not much different in a large region of
interest. Figure 2 shows angle dependence of sensitivity maps of a loop coil at
horizontal and vertical field MRI. Figure 2(i-n) shows that the total
sensitivity is not as different as the local sensitivity. Therefore, the loop
coil whose sensitivity was compensated by a CRC coil (LCA coil) will have the same sensitivity as a loop
array coil for horizontal field MRI. Figure 1(a,b) shows Element diagrams of a
developed torso coil and a spine coil using LCA coils. Each coil consists of 6 ch
loop coils and 2 ch CRC coils. The length of the loop coil in the axial
direction was shortened to minimize the area of signal loss and the loop coil
is compensated with the CRC coil. And distances between the left and right loop
coil are designed so that the noise correlation becomes small when placed on
the subject. For usability purpose, a flexible printed circuits and small
circuit elements were used.
Imaging performance were evaluated with 1.2 T MRI system (Spin-echo,
TR/TE = 500/30 ms, thickness = 2 mm, FOV = 450 mm, and matrix size = 256 × 128).
The comparison target was conventional multi-channel body coil that consist of
a solenoid coil, four saddle coils, and a CRC coil (SSCA, Fig. 1(d)). A cylinder
phantom (Diameter = 300 mm, Length = 500 mm, 10 mM NiCl2, and 0.4 wt% NaCl
solution) was used. The SNR was calculated by SNR = √(SHR-1S), where S is a vector of each coil sensitivity
at the same pixel, and R is the
noise correlation matrix calculated from E-fields[1].Results and Discussions
Figure 3 shows the developed body (LCA) coil and the conventional body
(SSCA) coil. The usability
of the developed coil was improved due to its flexibility like an array coil
for the horizontal field MRI. Figure 4(a,b) shows SNR maps
of the developed body coil and the conventional body coil. Fig. 4(c, d) shows the SNR line profiles of the
Axial direction of cylinder in whole region (central 300-mm circular) and the
deep region (central 30-mm circular area), respectively. The SNR improvement
rate was shown to be 1.42 and 1.02 times in the whole area and the side area,
respectively. Figure 5 shows g-factor maps of developed body coil and
conventional body coil. The mean g-max improvement rate was shown to be 1.39
and 1.24 times in the AX(A-P Phase) and COR(R-L phase), respectively. These results indicate that the usability
and the imaging performance of the developed coil were improved. In this study, 16 channel array coil has been developed due
to the limitation of the device. However, the performance of the coil of
vertical field MRI will be further improved like a horizontal field MRI by
increasing multi channels over 16.Conclusion
The usability and the imaging performance of the developed coil were
improved compared to the conventional coil by the LCA technique. This
technique will contribute to further improving the performance of the vertical
field MRI.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Roemer PB, Edelstein WA, Hayes CE, et
al. The NMR phased array. Magn Reson Med. 1990 Nov; 16 (2): 192-225.
2. Hardy CJ, Giaquinto RO, Piel JE, Rohling
KW, Marinelli L, Blezek DJ, Fiveland EW, Darrow RD, Foo TK. 128-channel body
MRI with a flexible high-density receiver-coil array. J Magn Reson Imaging.
2008 Nov; 28 (5): 1219-25.
3. Wiggins GC, Polimeni JR, Potthast A,
Schmitt M, Alagappan V, Wald LL. 96-Channel receive-only head coil for 3 Tesla:
design optimization and evaluation. Magn Reson Med. 2009 Sep; 62 (3): 754-62.
4. Takizawa M, Goto T, Mochizuki H, Nonaka
M, Nagai S, Takeuchi H, Taniguchi Y, Ochi H, Takahashi T. Cardiac cine parallel
imaging on a 0.7T open system. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2004 Apr 1; 3 (1): 45-9.
5. Ochi H, Yamamoto E, Sawaya K, Adachi S.
Calculation of electromagnetic field of an MRI antenna loaded by a body. Proceedings
of the 11th Annual Meeting of SMRM, Berlin; 1992. p. 4021.