Tales Santini1, Anthony DeFranco1, Tiago Martins1, Andrea Sajewski1, Howard J. Aizenstein1, and Tamer S. Ibrahim1
1University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
Synopsis
In this work, we investigated the potential of the smaller
sizes of the Tic-Tac-Toe transmit coil elements, comparing the newly developed
uncoupled configuration with the traditional coupled version of this RF coil
design. Simulations with 14 Tic-Tac-Toe panels showed excellent levels of
transmit field homogeneity at 7T (coefficient of variation = 12.6%, average = 0.28µT for
1W) while maintaining low levels of SAR (SAR efficiency = 1.41 µT/√(W/Kg)).
The simulations were validated with phantom experiments. Future work includes
the assembling of the 28-channel transmit coil and the investigation of the optimal
power splitting strategy.
Introduction
The coupled 16-channel 9-inch (229x229mm2) Tic-Tac-Toe
(TTT) head coil has shown highly homogenous circularly polarized transmit RF
magnetic field (B1+) and low levels of SAR at 7T [1-3].
In order to further improve the RF performance, patient comfort, and accessibility,
the coil panel design can be reduced to approximately a quarter of its original
area, increasing the number of transmit channels and, therefore, increasing the
degrees of freedom in RF shimming optimizations. The smaller design also permits
the coil to be completely open from the front.
However, the coupling of the TTT coil greatly increases in
the smaller sizes, reducing the power efficiency and potentially impacting the
B1+ homogeneity in systems with limited power capabilities.
In this work, we present an alternative uncoupled design of the TTT design by
removing the opposite ports from the traditional design and inserting a
matching circuit. Simulations of the full 28-channel model and experimental
validation using a single panel and a spherical phantom are presented.Methods
The computational models were created with 1.58 mm isotropic
Yee cells utilizing an in-house developed software written in Python3 language.
Figure 1a shows the full model, which has 14 TTT panels around the head (Duke
model) and an aperture in the frontal portion for improved subject comfort and for
easy access to projection in fMRI studies. Two different configurations of the
panels are presented: a coupled TTT design with 4 channels per panel (Figure
1b), and an uncoupled TTT design with 2 channels (Figure 1c). One implemented TTT
panel is shown in Figure 1d. The full model utilizes the 2 channels per panel
configuration, totaling 28 channels. A proof-of-concept model was 3D printed in
ABS plastic for the surrounding box and the struts were CNC machined from Rexolite
sheets. Double side 4µm-thick copper sheets (Polyflon, Germany) were used for
the shields and 8µm-thick copper sheets were used for the struts.
The RF fields were simulated using an in-house developed
code, written in C language. Phase and amplitude RF-shimming was performed
using MATLAB R2020a, with a combination of B1+ CV, B1+
max/min, and average SAR as the cost function, constraining the average B1+
to greater than 0.27μT for 1W input power, following the strategy described in [1].
The region of interest in the optimization includes: 1) for the B1+
fields, the head from the bottom of the brain stem to the top of the head,
excluding the nasal cavities and ears; 2) for the electrical RF fields, the
whole head from the top of the neck. Experimental B1+
maps were collected at 7T (Magnetom, Siemens, Germany) using the turbo flash
sequence, with the following parameters: TR/TE = 2000/1.16 ms; flip angle from
0° to 90° in 18 degrees increments; acquisition time = 12 min; resolution 3.2
mm isotropic. A spherical phantom with 169 mm in diameter, relative
permittivity of 79, and conductivity of 0.49 S/m was used in the experimental
validation.Results
Figures 2a and 2b show the simulated s-parameters of the two
configurations tuned and matched to 297.2 MHz. The coupled TTT presents a strong
coupling between the opposite ports of the panel (-0.82dB) and low coupling between ports
on opposite sides of the coil (-36dB), while the uncoupled configuration presents
similar coupling between the adjacent port (-12dB) and the port located in the opposite
side of the coil (-12dB). Figure 3 shows the B1+ and SAR
performance of the 28-channel uncoupled model, achieving whole-brain homogenous
B1+ field distribution while maintaining low levels of
power deposition in the tissues. Figure 4 shows the comparison between the
simulated single panel B1+ maps and the experimental data.Discussion
The uncoupled 2-channel TTT coil design has shown higher
power efficiency in comparison with the traditional 4-channel configuration, which
can be translated into high homogeneity while maintaining high levels of SAR
efficiency with RF-shimming of the 28-channel coil. We expect, however, the
4-channel and 2-channel to present similar performance with high capability
power amplifiers (16 kW or more for instance). The potential disadvantage of the
uncoupled configuration is the higher sensitivity to load, this issue will be
further investigated in future work.
Future work includes the development of methods to split the
power to the channels. Ideally, we want to use the single-channel mode from the
MRI scanner and split the power as close as possible from the results from the
RF-shimming optimization. Moreover, while only one RF-shimming case is
presented in this work, there is an infinite number of operational points that
can be used to drive the transmit channels, which represents a tradeoff between
homogeneity, SAR efficiency, and B1+ power efficiency.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NIH R01MH111265 and R01AG063525.
The author Tales Santini was partially supported by the CAPES Foundation,
Ministry of Education of Brazil, 13385/13-5. This research was also supported
in part by the University of Pittsburgh Center for Research Computing (CRC)
through the resources provided.References
1. Santini T, Wood S, Krishnamurthy N,
Martins T, Aizenstein HJ, Ibrahim TS. Improved 7 Tesla Transmit Field
Homogeneity with Reduced Electromagnetic Power Deposition Using Coupled Tic Tac
Toe Antennas. bioRxiv. 2020:2020.11.06.371328. doi: 10.1101/2020.11.06.371328. Accepted
for publication in Scientific Reports.
2. Krishnamurthy
N, Santini T, Wood S, Kim J, Zhao T, Aizenstein HJ, et al. Computational and experimental
evaluation of the Tic-Tac-Toe RF coil for 7 Tesla MRI. PloS one. 2019;14(1):e0209663.
Epub 2019/01/11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209663. PubMed PMID: 30629618.
3. Santini
T, Zhao Y, Wood S, Krishnamurthy N, Kim J, Farhat N, et al. In-vivo and numerical
analysis of the eigenmodes produced by a multi-level Tic-Tac-Toe head transmit
array for 7 Tesla MRI. PloS one. 2018;13(11):e0206127. doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0206127.