Jing Liu1, Hailong Li1, Lingxiao Cao1, Xue Li2, Suming Zhang1, and Xiaoqi Huang1
1Huaxi MR Research Center (HMRRC), Functional and molecular imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, 2Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
Synopsis
In current study,
we use static and dynamic functional connectivity (sFC/dFC) to examine the connectivity
alternation of bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) in medication-free
patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) to clarify the neural
underpinnings of OCD. We found that BNST demonstrated different connected regions
in sFC and dFC, indicating that the combination between sFC and dFC can help to
detect BNST network alternations in OCD in a more comprehensive way by
considering both the static and time-varying aspects.
Background
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD),
characterizing repetitive and persistent thoughts, images, impulses, and are
commonly associated with anxiety 1.
Emerging evidence suggests the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST)
mediates anxiety through connections with other brain regions 2. Resting state functional connectivity
(FC) is a common tool to identify the temporal correlations in spatially
separated brain regions and is widely used for characterizing brain network
alternations in mental disorders. Previous studies mostly assumed that the FC
was constant during the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning. Recently, we
have seen the emergence of interest in the temporal properties of FC (i.e.,
dynamic FC). However, there are no studies regarding dynamic FC (dFC) of the
BNST in OCD patients. So in current study, we aimed to demonstrate whether OCD
patients exist time-varying connectivity alternation using dFC and we also
combine the traditional static FC (sFC) to help fully understand the
characteristic change of BNST connectivity in OCD. Methods
A total of 87
medication-free OCD patients (age 29.06 ± 8.71) and 90 sex- and age- matched healthy controls (HC) (age 28.34 ± 10.85) were recruited in current study (Table 1). We used
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) to assess severity of OCD
symptoms and used Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) and Hamilton Depression Scale
(HAMD) to assess anxiety and depression level.
All the subjects
were scanned by a 3-Tesla GE MRI system. The T1 and resting state functional MRI images
were obtained for each subject and preprocessed using DPARSF software (http://www.restfmri.net).
The static and dynamic FC maps were estimated by DynamicBC toolbox
(http://restfmri.net/forum/DynamicBC). The left and right BNST seed were
generated using WFU PickAtlas 3.
For sFC, we
calculated the mean value during the whole session for each pair correlation. For
dFC, we applied sliding window technique with a window size of 30 TRs (60
seconds) basing on the previous studies 4.
The standard deviation (SD) maps of FC for each subject across 161 windows were
calculated which were then used to assess the temporal variability of
BNST-based functional connectivity. Then static maps and SD maps were
standardized.
We used two-sample
t-tests with false discovery rate correction (pcorr <
0.05 at the cluster level, puncorr < 0.001 at the voxel
level) to demonstrate brain regions with significant differences between the
two groups. In addition, to identify brain regions associate with clinical
symptom severity, we performed whole brain correlation analysis using Pearson
correlation. The procedures of present study were showed in Figure 1.Results
Static
FC: We observed increased sFC between the
left BNST and bilateral medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and anterior cingulate
cortex (ACC), decreased sFC between the left BNST and right hippocampus and
bilateral thalamus in OCD patients compared with HC. OCD patients also showed
hyperconnectivity between the right BNST and the bilateral mPFC and ACC (Figure
2A and Table 2).
Dynamic
FC: Patients demonstrated decreased dFC
between the left BNST and right superior temporal gyrus (STG) compared with HC.
The dFC pattern of the right BNST did not significantly differ between groups
(Figure 2B and Table 2).
Whole
brain correlation: We found that the HAMA
scores positively correlated with the dFC between the left BNST and the left
lingual gyrus, between the left BNST and the right inferior occipital gyrus. In
addition, there was also a positive correlation between the illness and the dFC
between the right BNST and the right lingual gyrus (Figure 2C).
Discussion & Conclusion
In the present
study, we investigated the static and dynamic connectivity alternations of BNST
in medication-free patients with OCD for the first time. We observed that the connectivity
patterns of BNST in sFC and dFC are completely different. Specifically, the
BNST showed decreased sFC with regions involved emotion processing such as hippocampus
and thalamus, and increased sFC with regions associated with cognitive control
such as mPFC and ACC. On the other hand, the BNST revealed decreased
time-varying connectivity to superior temporal gyrus related with sensory
processing.
Taken together,
our results suggest the sFC and dFC provided different information and indicate
their combination can help to detect abnormal connectivity pattern in a more
comprehensive way by considering both the static and time-varying aspects. And
this may be particular useful in mental disorders whose neural mechanism is
still largely unknown.
Acknowledgements
This study was
supported by National Nature Science Foundation (Grant NO. 81671669), Science
and Technology Project of Sichuan Province (Grant NO. 2017JQ0001).References
1. Stein DJ, Costa DLC, Lochner C, et al.
Obsessive-compulsive disorder. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019; 5(1): 52.
2. Avery SN, Clauss JA, Winder DG, et al.
BNST neurocircuitry in humans. Neuroimage. 2014; 91: 311-23.
3. Rabellino D, Densmore M, Harricharan S,
et al. Resting-state functional connectivity of the bed nucleus of the stria
terminalis in post-traumatic stress disorder and its dissociative subtype. Hum
Brain Mapp. 2018; 39(3): 1367-79.
4. Nalci A, Rao BD, Liu TT. Nuisance
effects and the limitations of nuisance regression in dynamic functional
connectivity fMRI. Neuroimage. 2019; 184: 1005-31.