Gabriele Bonanno1,2,3, Tom Hilbert4,5,6, Patrick Leibig7, and Tobias Kober4,5,6
1Advanced Clinical Imaging Technology,Siemens Healthcare AG, Bern, Switzerland, 2Translational Imaging Center, sitem-insel AG, Bern, Switzerland, 3Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland, 4Advanced Clinical Imaging Technology, Siemens Healthcare AG, Lausanne, Switzerland, 5Department of Radiology, University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland, 6LTS5, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, 7Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
Synopsis
Relaxometry in the rotating frame can give unique insights into low
frequency biological processes, and therefore may be a valuable quantitative
MRI method for clinical research of neurodegenerative diseases. However, T1ρ maps
require long scan times for whole-brain coverage with high isotropic resolution.
We present a T1ρ mapping method based on an accelerated spiral-phyllotaxis 3D
Cartesian gradient echo scan with compressed sensing reconstruction that allows
for <7-min acquisition time and provides maps directly at the scanner to
facilitate a fast workflow for clinical applications. Our method also demonstrated
excellent repeatability and reproducibility.
INTRODUCTION
T1ρ is used to study low frequency biological processes to which other
contrast mechanisms are less sensitive and has therefore gained increasing
interest in basic and clinical research of the brain. For example, it was shown
to detect abnormalities in the white matter related to multiple sclerosis [1]. However, long acquisition times are required to obtain 3D T1ρ maps with full-brain coverage and high isotropic resolution. Additionally,
offline processing to produce relaxometry maps may limit its implementation in clinical
workflows.
Here, we present a 3D T1ρ mapping method with an accelerated
compressed sensing acquisition, and inline map reconstruction. The first goal
of this study was to investigate sequence and reconstruction parameters for a full-brain
protocol with 1-mm isotropic resolution and acquisition times (TA) that are feasible
for clinical applications. Second, we tested the optimized protocol for
repeatability and reproducibility in healthy subjects.METHODS
IRB-approved experiments were performed in nine healthy subjects (three
females, 28.6±3.3yo) at 3 T (MAGNETOM Prisma, Siemens
Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) using a commercial 64-channel head coil. In each subject, whole-brain images were acquired with a segmented 3D FLASH
[2] prototype sequence employing a Cartesian variable-density
spiral-phyllotaxis sampling pattern [3] in the two phase-encoding directions. Readouts of the FLASH block followed a center-out radial-like trajectory
(Figure 1A). A T1ρ preparation module, with
adiabatic 90° pulses [4] and a rectangular spin-lock pulse (SL) at 500 Hz, was played
out before each readout train (Figure 1B). The SL pulse duration (SL-time) was
changed to adjust the T1ρ-weighting of the image. Four
volumes were acquired consecutively in one scan with SL-times of 2, 30, 50 and
80 ms for T1ρ mapping. Other protocol
parameters included: TR=2000 ms, 160 readouts/TR, 8°
FLASH RF-excitation angle, FLASH-TR/TE=5.8/1.9 ms, FOV=256x192x256 mm3,
resolution=1x1x1 mm3, sagittal orientation.
Reconstructions of all scans were performed inline on the
scanner with a prototype compressed sensing algorithm [5] using a Haar wavelet
regularization. T1ρ maps were automatically generated inline from
the four SL-time volumes using a log-linear voxel-wise fit of $$$M_{t}=M_{0}\exp(-t/T_{1\rho})$$$, with t denoting the SL-time.
To optimize TA with respect to image quality, T1ρ-prepared
images with SL-time=80 ms were acquired in one subject with identical protocol
parameters and acceleration factors (AF)=1/1.9/3.3/4/5.1/6.1/7/8. AF=1 was used as reference to compute NRMSE
and SSIM [6] for the other AFs. T1ρ
maps (i.e. images with SL-time=2/30/50 ms) were acquired for AF=1.9-8 and
evaluated visually by the authors.
After selection of an AF, the optimized T1ρ mapping
protocol was tested in eight other subjects for repeatability where a first Reference
scan was compared to a second Repeat scan performed in the same subject
after repositioning during the same session. For reproducibility a third scan
was performed in the same subject one week later (One-Week scan).
Additionally, an MP-RAGE [7] sequence was acquired as anatomical
reference for automatic segmentation of volumes-of-interest (VOI) before each T1ρ-map scan.
Offline analysis: masks of nine bilateral VOIs (in white and gray matter, and deep brain
structures) were obtained using the prototype segmentation software MorphoBox [8].
Subsequently, VOIs were rigidly registered [9] to the native space of the T1ρ maps. Median T1ρ values were extracted from
each VOI, and their mean and standard deviation were computed across subjects
for Reference, Repeat and One-Week scans. Linear regression and Bland-Altman
analyses of the medians were performed for repeatability and reproducibility
assessment [10].RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
All scans were reconstructed directly
on the scanner hardware in approximately 2 min/volume.
TA for different AF are reported
in Figure 2 for T1ρ-weighted images and maps. Images showed increased undersampling artifacts
with increasing AF; as a result, the NRMSE increased and the SSIM decreased (Figure
2, bottom). Notably, similar visual image quality as well as NRMSE and SSIM
were found for AF=4 and 5.1. Noise amplification in the center of the brain with
generally poor image quality was found for AF≥7.1. Considering these
results, AF=5.1 was selected as a good tradeoff between quality and TA,
allowing for T1ρ mapping in <7 min. With this protocol, the reconstruction
regularization factor was empirically optimized and set to 0.001.
Representative orthogonal views from
one subject using the optimized protocol illustrate the image quality obtained
in T1ρ-weighted images and maps (Figure
3).
In another subject, Repeat and One-Week
scans show good image quality and qualitative similarity for all T1ρ weightings as well as for the maps
in comparison to their Reference scan (Figure 4).
Quantitatively, mean T1ρ ranged between 95
and 110 ms in the VOIs with higher values for gray matter structures and
thalamus (Figure 5A). Excellent agreement (R2=0.99) and
repeatability (limits of agreement=1.2 ms) were found between Repeat and
Reference measures (Figure 5B). Very good agreement (R2=0.96) and
high reproducibility (limits of agreement=1.8 ms) were also found for One-Week
measures (Figure 5C).CONCLUSION
High-resolution
T1ρ mapping of the whole brain is feasible with the
proposed method in under 7 min with images and maps directly obtained at the
scanner with reconstruction times compatible with a clinical workflow. Excellent repeatability and good reproducibility
of the technique were found in a small healthy cohort. In conclusion, the
proposed method may ease the use of T1ρ
mapping for clinical research in both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
- Filip P et al., Rotating frame
MRI relaxations as markers of diffuse white matter abnormalities in multiple
sclerosis, NeuroImage: Clinical (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102234
- Haase A, Frahm J, Matthaei D,
Hänicke W, Merboldt K‐D. FLASH imaging: rapid NMR imaging using low flip angle
pulses. J Magn Reson 1986; 67: 258–266.
- Forman C, et al.
High-resolution 3D whole-heart coronary MRA: a study on the combination of data
acquisition in multiple breath-holds and 1D residual respiratory motion
compensation. Magn Reson Mater Phy 2014;27:435-443.
- Schuenke P at al., Adiabatically
Prepared Spin-Lock Approach for T1r-Based Dynamic Glucose Enhanced MRI at
Ultrahigh Fields. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 78:215–225 (2017).
- Wetzl J,
Forman C, Wintersperger BJ, et al. High‐resolution
dynamic CE‐MRA of the thorax enabled by iterative TWIST reconstruction. Magn
Reson Med. 2017;77:833–840.
- Zhou, W., A. C. Bovik, H. R.
Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli. "Image Qualifty Assessment: From Error
Visibility to Structural Similarity." IEEE Transactions on Image
Processing. Vol. 13, Issue 4, April 2004, pp. 600–612.
- Mugler JP, Brookeman JR. Three-dimensional magnetization-prepared
rapid gradient-echo imaging (3D MP RAGE). Magn Reson Med.
1990;15(1):152-157.
- Schmitter, Daniel, et al.
"An evaluation of volume-based morphometry for prediction of mild
cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease." NeuroImage: Clinical 7
(2015): 7-17.
- S. Klein, M. Staring, K. Murphy, M.A. Viergever, J.P.W. Pluim, "elastix: a toolbox for intensity based medical image registration," IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (2010), vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 196-205.
- David Cumin (2020). Bland
Altman Plot https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/24645-bland-altman-plot),
MATLAB Central File Exchange. Retrieved December 15, 2020.