Matthäus Poniatowski1, Ilan Elias2, Mirsad Mahmutovic1, Gurinder Multani1, Sam-Luca J.D. Hansen1, Markus W. May1, Alexander M. König3, Jens H. Figiel3, Andreas H. Mahnken3, and Boris Keil1
1Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, TH Mittelhessen University of Applied Sciences, Gießen, Germany, 2Motionrad GmbH, Berlin, Germany, 3Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
Synopsis
Limitations of conventional MRI include its
lack of ability to observe controlled joint motion and biomechanics in
real-time. Although clinically evident, many injuries, instabilities, and
dysfunctions of the musculoskeletal system are frequently not depicted on
conventional static MRI. To enable dynamic MRI for joints, an in-bore
motion-assisted device and a wearable coil array was designed, constructed, and
validated. The combination of robotic assisted joint motion, a tight-fitting
coil array that does not restrict the joint's range of motion, and accelerated
imaging enabled dynamic MRI of the ankle.
Introduction
Many musculoskeletal disorders are strongly
correlated to pathomechanical motion patterns. While conventional static MRI in
musculoskeletal (MSK) diagnostics is widely used to assess the structure of
various joints, it does not provide adequate information about their functional
status and fails to detect many injuries, instabilities, and syndromes1-4.
Dynamic MRI examination for quantifying functional
joint motion can be found since early 90’s5,6.
Commonly, the patient’s joint movements have been
performed actively and unassisted. However, only controlled passive joint
motion provides information about intrinsic motion pathologies7,8.
In order to unlock the full potential of dynamic
joint MRI, robotic assisted joint movements and accelerated imaging with
tight-fitting flexible array coils are critical. Therefore, the primary rationale
of this hardware study was to develop an MRI compatible robotic device for
controlled ankle movements and combine this technology with a highly flexible
High Impedance Coil (HIC) array which was designed like a sock.Methods
Wearable 4ch High Impedance Coil: The design of the coil elements is based on the work
of Zhang et al9. The coils were made from a 50 Ohm coaxial cable (G
02232, HUBER+SUHNER, Herisau, Switzerland). The length was chosen so that the
cable would have approximately the correct resonant frequency with the outer
conductor shorted and with a gap in the middle of the outer conductor. The
inner conductor was soldered to a small output port that also comprises the
active detuning circuit, the matching network, and a trimming capacitor for
fine tuning. The circular overlapped HIC loops encompassed the ankle and were
sewn onto a sock (Fig.1). The circuit board was connected to the preamplifier
with a coaxial cable, carefully adjusted in length, in order to transform the
preamplifier’s impedance to a short at the coil terminal.
Rigid 4ch Low Impedance Coil: For imaging performance evaluation, the 4ch HIC
array coil was compared to a regular 4ch phased-array coil10,
which was designed in the conventional manner. This
Low Impedance Coil (LIC) array consists of a tight-fitting splittable housing,
where the patient’s ankle can be easily placed (Fig.2). The coil housing was
mounted on the robotic motion device. The 4 geometrically overlapped LIC loop
elements were constructed from silver-plated copper wire and also encompassed
the ankle joint. All adjacent coil elements were critically overlapped and
additionally decoupled using preamplifiers. The active detuning circuitry and
matching network were directly integrated into the preamplifier's daughterboard.
Robotic Motion Device: We have further developed our MR compatible robotic motion
device7,8, to be compatible with the two 4ch array coils. The
robotic device uses two piezo motor to perform controlled physiological
movements such as dorsal extension/plantar flexion as well as
pronation/supination.
Image acquisition: Phantom and volunteer imaging was carried out on a
1.5T clinical scanner (MAGNETOM Espree, Siemens Healthineers AG, Erlangen,
Germany). Pixelwise SNR calculations were derived from a PD weighted sequence (TR/TE/α=300ms/5ms/20°,
matrix: 256x256, slice: 4mm, BW=150Hz/px)
and followed the Kellman method11 (Fig.3). Noise correlation was obtained from the same sequence
but with 0 V Tx amplitude. A single loop of HIC and LIC (diameter 12 cm) was
constructed for direct SNR comparisons between the two receive coil
technologies. Initial volunteer imaging compared high-resolution anatomical T1 imaging
between the 4ch-HIC and 4ch-LIC arrays (Fig.4). Accelerated dynamical joint
imaging was demonstrated with a turbo FLASH sequence using GRAPPA factors 2 and
3 (TE/α=/3.99ms/12°, resolution:
0.8x0.8x3mm, BW=130Hz/px RGRAPPA=2: TR=1680ms; RGRAPPA=3:
TR=1220ms)(Fig.5).Results
The piezo motors and the remote-control unit of the
robotic motion device were well-shielded and did not generate any artefacts in
the acquired images. Adjacent loop decoupling ranged from -14 dB to -18 dB for
the HIC and from -18 dB to -20 dB for the LIC. Isolation between tuned and
detuned state achieved by active detuning was better than -24 dB for both 4ch
coils. Preamplifier decoupling provided another -17 dB. The noise correlation
for the LIC and HIC ranged from 5% to 18% and 8% to 23%, respectively. The
regular single loop LIC outperformed the size matched HIC loop by 8%. However,
due to the tight-fitting form factor (wearable sock), the 4ch HIC provided a 1.3-fold
better SNR when compared with the 4ch LIC array. Both coils enable dynamic
acquisition with GRAPPA factor 2 and 3. However, the wearable HIC coil showed overall
favorable reception sensitivity for accelerated in vivo dynamic imaging.Discussion
An MRI-compatible robotic device for controlled
ankle motion and a wearable high-impedance coil were developed to improve
dynamic MR imaging. The intrinsic property of low coupling between the loop elements
of the HIC array is well-suited for guided joint motion. The coil maintains a
tight fit in any position of the ankle, thus, providing high sensitivity during
the dynamic acquisition. The advantage of such robotic assisted MR imaging
method in combination with a wearable HIC enables clinicians to perform
controlled passive motion of joints during imaging and could potentially detect
pathologies that are occult to conventional static imaging.Conclusion
By enhancing spatio-temporal resolution with a
highly flexible HIC array, dynamic robotic assisted ankle imaging was feasible.
The combined and orchestrated technology of wearable coils and robotic assisted
motion showed the potential to expand the utility
of MR in diagnosis from the biomechanical musculoskeletal system.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Raikin SM, Elias I, Nazarian LN: Intrasheath subluxation of the
peroneal tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 May; 90 (5): 992-9.
[2] Emerging MRI Technologies for Imaging Musculoskeletal Disorders Under
Loading Stress. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services. AHRQ Publication No. 11-EHC024-EF, (2011)
www.ahrq.gov.
[3] Foot Hyperbook. An evidence-based resource for education in foot and
ankle surgery. http://www.foothyperbook.com/elective/ankleInstability/ankleInstabImaging.htm.
[4] The American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society. AOFAS. Physicians Resource
Center. http://www.aofas.org/PRC/conditions/Pages/Conditions/Ankle-Instability.aspx.
[5] Yustin DC, Rieger MR, McGuckin RS, Connelly ME. Determination of the
existence of hinge movements of the temporomandibular joint during normal
opening by Cine-MRI and computer digital addition. J Prosthodont Off J Am Coll
Prosthodont. 1993;2: 190–195.
[6] Melchert UH, Schröder C, Brossmann J, Muhle C. Motion-triggered cine
MR imaging of active joint movement. Magn Reson Imaging. 1992;10: 457–460.
[7] Elias I, Zoga AC, Schweitzer ME, Morrison WB, Abolmaali N. Controlled
Dynamic Movement of Joints and Spine during Ultra-fast MRI Using a Motor Driven
Device: Feasibility and Practical Application, RSNA, Annual Meeting,
Chicago,USA (2011)
[8] Elias I, Abolmaali N, Morrison WB, Vaccaro AR, Lohrer H, Vogl TJ:
Real Time Passive Motion of the Musculoskeletal System Using a Motor Driven
Kinematic Device During Ultra Fast MRI. ISMRM Annual Meeting, Miami, USA
(2005).
[9] Zhang B, Sodickson DK, Cloos MA. A high-impedance detector-array
glove for magnetic resonance imaging of the hand. Nat Biomed Eng. 2018. doi: 10.1038/s41551-018-0233-y.
[10] Roemer PB, Edelstein WA, Hayes CE, Souza SP, Mueller OM. The NMR
phased array. Magn Reson Med. 1990;16(2):192-225. doi:10.1002/mrm.1910160203
[11] Kellman P, McVeigh ER. Image reconstruction in SNR units: a general
method for SNR measurement. Magn Reson Med. 2005 Dec;54(6):1439-47. doi:
10.1002/mrm.20713. Erratum in: Magn Reson Med. 2007 Jul;58(1):211-2. PMID:
16261576