Sigrun Roat1, Andre Kuehne2, Lena Nohava1,3, and Elmar Laistler1
1High Field MR Center, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 2MRI.TOOLS GmbH, Berlin, Germany, 3CEA, CNRS, Inserm, BioMaps (Laboratoire d'Imagerie BiomeĢdicale Multimodale Paris Saclay), UniversiteĢ Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
Synopsis
Flexible RF coils gained
large interest in recent years. One possibility to achieve flexibility is using
transmission line resonator-type coils made from coaxial cable. These
self-resonant structures can be constructed without lumped elements along the
loop enhancing flexibility. No consensus has been reached yet whether these coils
should be driven at their respective self-resonance. To investigate this
question, we have performed a simulation study investigating 11 different
setups at 3 frequencies each
Introduction
The low signal-to-noise
ratio that is associated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be
alleviated by a number of technical advancements, such as employing form-fitted
phased array radio frequency (RF) coils. A novel realization of a flexible RF
coil is the coaxial coil (CC) transmission line resonator (TLR), comprised of
coaxial cable1,2. The inner and outer conductor (cable shield),
separated by a dielectric material and intersected by diagonally opposite gaps, are acting as the
two transmission line segments. It is a self-resonant structure and its
resonant frequency depends on coil geometry and material properties, such as
coil diameter, dielectric permittivity and number of gaps. Although it seems
natural to use such self-resonant coils at their resonance frequency, recent
studies showed successful operation of a CC far away from their self-resonance
employing capacitive and/or inductive tuning across the coil port3.
In this work we investigate the performance of CCs at their self-resonance (f0)
as well as at the respective Larmor frequency (fL) for 3T and 7T MRI
employing 3D electromagnetic simulation.Methods
Eleven CC setups,
differing in coil diameter (40,70,100 and 150mm), number of gaps (1-3) and
cable type were modeled. Their performance in terms of their mean surface
current amplitude at f0 and fL for Siemens 3T and 7T MRI
systems, i.e. 123.3MHz and 297.2MHz, respectively, were investigated. The
different setups are stated in more detail in Table 1.
Simulations were
performed using the finite element solver of CST Studio Suite 2020 (Dassault Systèmes,
Paris, France). Second order finite elements were used to approximate curved
surfaces of the coaxial cable. Broadband results between 50 and 500MHz were generated
using the general-purpose broadband sweep method of CST (maximum S-parameter
interpolation error=0.001), using approximately 10 frequency samples. For each
setup, f0 of the unloaded coaxial loop was determined by finding the
first local maximum of |Z|. 3D current monitors were then placed at f0
and fL for 3T and 7T. Surface current density ($$$K=dI/dl$$$) as well as
the accepted power were exported for post-processing in Matlab 2017b (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA).
Simulations were scaled to 1W of actually accepted input power derived from
simulation.
The surface current density was analyzed on three conducting
structures: the surface of the inner conductor (iC) and the inner and outer surface
of the cable shield (oCi and oCo, respectively). The surface current I was derived by integrating K over volumes along
the structures of a length of 1mm and multiplication with the respective
conductor circumference.Results and discussion
Generally, the current
on oCi is the mirror-current with opposite direction of I on iC. At their
respective f0, the classical TLR behavior, i.e. a maximum in current
density magnitude at each outer gap and a zero at each inner gap, can be
observed. The current that effectively produces the B1 field in the
sample is the one running on oCo, is constant along the conductor as long as
the segment length is electrically short versus the wavelength. Figure 1A shows
an exemplary dataset (Ø=100mm, 1 gap, cable type A) of K on iC, oCi, and oCo evaluated at the 3
investigated frequencies. Figure 1B shows the corresponding I on the respective
structures. We see that for 3T and f0 (Fig.1B green and black line),
the results are comparable, since fL is close to self resonance (fL/f0≈1.13). Whereas for 7T
(Fig.1B blue line), far away from self-resonance (fL/f0≈2.73) the surface
current distribution is very different. The resulting mean surface currents on
oCo ($$$\overline{I_{oCo}}$$$) near self-resonance
are about a factor of 4-5 higher than for the 7T result operated far away from self-resonance.
The performance of each coil design in terms of $$$\overline{I_{oCo}}$$$ when
operated at one of the investigated Larmor frequencies ($$$\overline{I_{oCo}(f_L)}$$$) with
respect to its performance at f0 ($$$\overline{I_{oCo}(f_0)}$$$) is
plotted versus the deviation of fL from f0 can be seen in
Figure 2. For
all investigated coils operated above their self-resonance, the ($$$\overline{I_{oCo}(f_L)}/\overline{I_{oCo}(f_0)}$$$) decreases with increasing ratio fL/f0 (see
Fig.2 yellow area). For designs where this is not the case (fL<f0)
no clear tendency could be identified. Most designs showed higher current (Fig.2
green area), whereas 2 designs showed equal or smaller current. Additionally, a trend for lower mean surface current
with electrically longer segments between the gaps was observed. Figure 3 shows
two coil designs evaluated at fL=297.2MHz with the same diameter and
cable type (Ø=70mm, cable type B) with
1 gap at 2.2 time the self-resonance frequency (B1) and with 2 gaps close to self-resonance
(B2), fL/f0=1.1. The mean surface current for the coil
approximately at self-resonance is ≈ 70% higher.Conclusion
We were able to demonstrate that
the mean surface current on the MR signal-relevant outer surface of the shield
of coaxial coils decreases, the further above their self-resonance frequency
they are operated. For operating frequencies below f0, more datasets
in that regime are needed to draw a conclusion. In this study, multi-gap
designs with symmetric placement of gaps were investigated, in future studies also
asymmetrical gap locations, as introduced by Mollaei et al.4, need
to be taken into account. In future studies the resulting B1+
and SAR will be investigated to obtain directly MR signal-relevant performance indicators.Acknowledgements
This project was funded by the Austrian/French FWF/ANR
grant, Nr. I-3618, “BRACOIL“References
1 Zhang et al. in Nat Biomed Eng. 2018 Aug;2(8):570-577. doi:
10.1038/s41551-018-0233-
2 Nohava, L. et al.
in Proc.
Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 28 (2020) 4273 (2020).
3 Ruytenberg et al. in Magn
Reson Med. 2020 Mar;83(3):1135-1146. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27964
4 Mollaei et al. IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 129754-129762, 2020, doi:
10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3009367.