Christoph Michael Schildknecht1, Markus Weiger1, Romain Froidevaux1, and Klaas Paul Pruessmann1
1Institute for Biomedical Engineering, ETH Zurich and University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
Synopsis
For imaging of short-T2
samples often very short excitation pulses are desired, which requires high
peak RF power. In this work, a transmit-receive switch is presented that can handle
18kW peak RF power and switches its state in less than 1µs. The novel design uses a
timed cascade of anti-parallel PIN diode pairs to achieve this performance.
Introduction
For imaging compounds
with very short coherence life times it is of great importance that the
excitation pulse is short. This is particularly true for the zero echo time
(ZTE) technique, in which the readout gradient is already on during excitation.
In this case, the pulse duration determines a k-space gap to be minimized [1-5].
Further, in ZTE the excitation bandwidth must be at least as broad as the acquisition
bandwidth, limiting the pulse duration when block pulses are used. Finally, rapid
excitation also minimizes relaxation during the pulse.
As excitation pulses get
shorter, ever-higher RF power is required to still reach optimal flip angles. This
imposes steep requirements on the transmit-receive (T/R) switches involved,
which must not only handle increasing power, but also switch very fast, equally
in the order of microseconds. T/R switches are typically based on PIN diodes,
which require strong current pulses to change state rapidly and might overload
the RF receive chain by switching transients. To-date, the fastest T/R
switching in the kilowatt range has been achieved by symmetrically biasing PIN
diodes [6]. With this design, switching in less than 1µs has been accomplished at
2kW peak power. However, emerging modes of ZTE imaging with large bandwidth and
flip angle call for still higher RF power [7-8]
In this work, we
propose a timed cascade of PIN diodes to overcome current power limits. Using
this approach it is shown that sub-microsecond switching can be reconciled with
18kW RF transmission.Methods
The proposed RF
topology is shown in Fig. 1. During RF transmission, all PIN diodes are forward-biased.
Towards
the receive port, the PIN diodes are successively selected with shorter carrier lifetime and less
charge is injected during forward biasing. During reception,
the PIN diodes are reverse-biased. The anti-parallel arrangement of each diode
pair ensures rough cancelation of any transient voltages. The PIN diode pairs
in the receive path are reverse biased in a timed cascade, starting with the
one nearest to the TR port. In this way, transient voltage peaks are absorbed
by the subsequent PIN diodes, which are not yet reverse-biased when the
previous PIN diode stage peaks. Because later stages require less current to reverse-bias
rapidly, the final transient peak is sufficiently small to be within the linear
range of the utilized low noise amplifier.
The PIN diode driver
as shown in Fig. 2 is made such that the cascading is passively self-triggered.
A later PIN diode stage starts pulling out charge carriers from the intrinsic
layer as soon as the previous stage crosses zero Volt biasing. At zero Volts, the
majority of charge carriers have been extracted and the PIN diodes change to a
high impedance state. This ensures that when a PIN diode stage peaks, the subsequent
stage is still conducting RF and thereby catching such voltage peak.
Measurements of the
transient response were made with an Agilent Technologies MSO7054A oscilloscope,
a R&S SMB 100A signal generator, an Agilent Technologies 81104A
pulse-pattern generator and a National Instruments PXIe-5622 16-bit digitizer. Insertion
loss and isolation were measured with an Agilent Technologies E5071C network
analyzer. To validate the electrical and thermal integrity an Analogic AN8134 18kW amplifier, a R&S FSL spectrum and a Fluke TiS20 were utilized.
Finally, high-bandwidth
ZTE imaging with algebraic reconstruction was performed on phantoms and in-vivo
using a Philips Achieva 3T scanner with a high-performance insert gradient [9].Results
At the operation
frequency of 128MHz, the insertion loss from the TX to the TR port in the
transmit state is -0.25dB and the insulation to the RX port is -76.3dB. In the
receive state the insertion loss from the TR port to the RX port is -0.5dB and
the insulation towards the TX port is -62.5dB.
Fig. 2 shows the
cascaded reverse biasing and the switching process. Based on this data, the
rise time was assessed at 855ns and the maximum transient voltage is -25.5dBm.
Bench measurements verified
that full peak output power of the 18kW amplifier could be applied without losing
the integrity of the pulse. Fig. 3 shows, 100W average power with 15kW peak
power could be applied without issues.
The imaging revealed
that ZTE images of short-T2 phantoms, as shown in Fig. 4, exhibit no visible
artifacts related to the switching process. Further as shown in Fig. 5, with
13kW peak RF power, better SNR and contrast was achieved in in-vivo ZTE imaging,
compared to the more common 1kW. Discussion and conclution
The presented T/R switch
was shown to be able to handle high peak power of 18kW, while maintaining a
switching time below 1µs. These capabilities present will facilitate
imaging of materials with ever shorter T2 samples such as myelin or collagen [8,10].
Rapid switching was
accomplished with a timed cascade. The passive self-triggered reverse bias
sequence makes the design not only simple to implement but also robust since it
inherently adapts to alterations in voltage dynamics.
To further reduce the switching
time of the current implementation, higher reverse voltage could be applied and
the related increase in the transient voltage peak could be resolved by an
additional PIN diode stage in the cascade.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Weiger, M.,
Pruessmann, K.P. and Hennel, F. (2011), MRI with zero echo time: Hard versus
sweep pulse excitation. Magn. Reson. Med., 66: 379-389.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22799
[2] Weiger M,
Pruessmann KP. MRI with Zero Echo Time. eMagRes. 2012;1:311–322.
[3] Grodzki DM, Jakob
PM, Heismann B. Ultrashort echo time imaging using pointwise encoding time
reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA). Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
2012;67:510–518.
[4] Wu Y, Dai G,
Ackerman JL, Hrovat MI, Glimcher MJ, Snyder BD, Nazarian A, Chesler D a. Water-
and fat-suppressed proton projection MRI (WASPI) of rat femur bone. Magnetic
resonance in medicine. 2007;57:554–67.
[5] R.N. Froidevaux,
M.B. Rösler, D.O. Brunner, M. Weiger, K.P. Pruessmann, HYFI: hybrid filling of
the dead-time gap for faster zero echo time imaging, Proceedings of the 27th
Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Canada, Montreal (2019), p. 943
[6] Brunner, D.O., Furrer, L., Weiger, M.,
Baumberger, W., Schmid, T., Reber, J., Dietrich, B.E., Wilm, B.J., Froidevaux,
R., Pruessmann, K.P., 2016. Symmetrically
biased T/R switches for NMR and MRI with microsecond dead time. J. Magn. Reson. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2015.12.016
[7] Froidevaux, R, Weiger, M, Rösler, MB,
et al. High‐resolution short‐T2
MRI using a high‐performance gradient. Magn Reson Med. 2020; 84: 1933– 1946. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28254
[8] Markus Weiger, Romain
Froidevaux, Emily Louise Baadsvik, David Otto Brunner, Manuela Barbara Rösler,
Klaas Paul Pruessmann, Advances in MRI of the myelin bilayer, NeuroImage,
Volume 217, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116888.
[9] Weiger, M.,
Overweg, J., Rösler, M.B., Froidevaux, R., Hennel, F., Wilm, B.J., Penn, A.,
Sturzenegger, U., Schuth, W., Mathlener, M., Borgo, M., Börnert, P., Leussler,
C., Luechinger, R., Dietrich, B.E., Reber, J., Brunner, D.O., Schmid, T.,
Vionnet, L. and Pruessmann, K.P. (2018), A high‐performance gradient insert for
rapid and short‐T2 imaging at full duty cycle. Magn. Reson. Med, 79: 3256-3266.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26954
[10] Baadsvik, E.L.,
Weiger, M., Froidevaux, R., Rösler, M.B., Brunner, D.O., Öhrström, L., Rühli,
F.J., Eppenberger, P., Pruessmann, K.P., High-resolution MRI of mummified
tissues using advanced short-T2 methodology and hardware, (2021) Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine, 85 (3), pp. 1481-1492. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28615