Gary Zabow1, Stephen Dodd2, and Alan Koretsky2
1Applied Physics Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Boulder, CO, United States, 2NINDS, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
Synopsis
Planar
meander-line coils have been proposed as ideal surface coils because they
should, theoretically, create highly uniform fields over planes of essentially unlimited
area. Experimentally, however, field
uniformity of planar meander-line coils is often worse, not better, than even simple
loop surface coils. This presentation shows
why existing predictions of meander-line coil fields and imaging performance are
misinterpreted and how coil geometries can be simply corrected to better match
theory. In particular, it is shown how a
single extra turn of wire can increase field uniformity by at least an order of
magnitude, allowing for uniform, large-area near-surface imaging.
Introduction
Although
signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) of surface coils1 exceed those of volume coils for
near-surface imaging, their B1 field uniformity seriously lags volume coils. This poor field uniformity often limits
imaging and/or spectroscopy to only a small “sweet spot” some distance from the
coil surface, limiting imaging area and adversely impacting ultimate achievable
SNR. Meander-line2,3, or “zig-zag” or
“serpentine”, coils have been proposed as a possible alternative to more common
surface coils because such meander-line geometries should be able, at least
theoretically, to create highly uniform fields over planes of essentially unlimited
area. In reality, however, meander-line
coils have yet to gain much acceptance in NMR or MRI, possibly because existing
meander-line coils do not come near to achieving their promised field
uniformities. This paper addresses why
existing meander-line coils fall so short of their ideal theoretical behavior.
In particular, we show why meander-line coils, even those consisting of many
turns of wire, cannot be approximated as infinite systems, as is commonly taken
for granted in the theoretical analysis of such coils. We also show how this erroneous
approximation is directly responsible for increased coil field inhomogeneity
and show how coil geometries can be redesigned to more closely approach their promised field
uniformities.Theory
Apart from capacitance breaks, a
meander-line coil consists of one continuous wire looped back and forth to
create a number of connected parallel wire segments in which the current flows
in alternate directions (see Fig 1). To
simplify analysis, the fields of such coils are generally modeled as approximations
to the field of a coil with infinitely many antiparallel wire segments. Because of the spatially alternating current
direction, such infinite fields can be shown to decay exponentially away from
the coil surface and, in planes parallel to the plane of coil, to become
increasingly homogeneous with increasing distance from the coil. This homogeneity is a primary motivator for
using such coils for large-area near-surface imaging. Unfortunately, this increasing homogeneity
does not actually occur for a finite coil; instead, counterintuitively, the
field homogeneity can actually worsen with increasing distance. While the impact on field uniformity of this
failure of finite meander-line coils to approximate infinite coils seems not to
have been appreciated in NMR / MRI circles, it has been recognized long ago in
atomic physics, where such meander-line wires are used not as coils but as
magnetic mirrors4,5. Here we translate
the atomic physics results into terms applicable to coil design, using those
insights to redesign the meander-line geometry so that it better matches theory
and creates more uniform fields over large areas. A key insight is that because of the
non-linear exponential decay of a meander-line coil field, the ability of the
finite coil to approximate an infinite one, depends only logarithmically on the
number of wires. Therefore, a finite
coil quickly fails to look like an infinite coil no matter how many back and
forth turns of wire it contains. We show
how this difference between a finite and infinite coil is directly responsible
for coil field inhomogeneity and, as
indicated in figure 2 and further explained in the presentation, how the coil
can be made to approximate an infinite one by adding a single correcting split-return
wire around the coil’s edges. A second key
insight translatable to NMR coil design is that there exists an even-odd parity
effect on the number of wires in the coil, which, as seen in figures 3 and 4 and
as will be explained further in the presentation, leads to the odd coil outperforming
the even one.Experiment
To validate
the above theory, we compare two coils as shown in figure 2. The first contains an even number of
wires; the second, an odd number
together with a correcting split return current. Figure 3 shows side-view MRI images mapping
out magnetic field contours above the coils.
The coils lie along the base of the image, in a plane perpendicular to
the image plane with their wires looping back and forth, in and out of the
image plane. Images were generated by
deliberately overpowering the RF coil to generate multiple 2π
rotations in the surrounding water leading to a series of repeated maxima and
minima in the image dependent on flip angles, which are proportional to the
coil’s magnetic field magnitude at each location. That is, lines of maximum image intensity
directly map contour lines of equal magnetic field magnitude. Each line splits into a pair of lines
because maxima occur at both +/- the steady state Ernst angle about each 2π
rotation. It can be seen that (i) while
the field uniformity starts to improve with increasing distance from the coil,
it rapidly deteriorates again for a finite coil and (ii) the corrected coil
offers considerably better field uniformity.
Figure 4 shows signal intensity in top-down view, in planes parallel to
coil, showing again the increased uniformity of the corrected odd coil versus
the uncorrected even one.Conclusion
We
suggest a simple geometrical correction that improves the field uniformity of
meander-line coils over an order of magnitude, making such corrected coils promising
candidates for large-area near-surface imaging and spectroscopy applications.
Acknowledgements
This work
was supported in part by the NIH NINDS Intramural
Research
Program. We thank the NIH Mouse Imaging Facility for use of their MRI scannersReferences
1. J.J.H. Ackerman, T.H. Grove, G.G. Wong, D.G. Gadian, G.K. Radda,
Mapping of metabolites in whole animals by P-31 NMR using surface coils, Nature
283 (1980) 167-170.
2. S.A. Bogacz, J.B. Ketterson, NMR in normal 3He with a meander-line
coil, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 (1986) 591-594
3. T. Nakada, I.L. Kwee, T. Miyazaki, N. Iriguchi, T. Maki, 31P NMR
spectroscopy of the stomach by zig-zag coil, J. Magn. Reson. 5 (1987) 449-455
4. G.I. Opat, S.J. Wark, A. Cimmino, Electric and magnetic mirrors and
gratings for slowly moving neutral atoms and molecules, Appl. Phys. B 54 (1992)
396-402
5. G. Zabow, M. Drndic, J.H.
Thywissen, K.S. Johnson, R.M. Westervelt, M. Prentiss, Improving the specularity of magnetic mirrors for atoms, Eur. Phys. J. D 7,
351 (1999).