Paul Nobre1, Gwenaël Gaborit2,3, Raphaël Sablong1, Lionel Duvillaret3, and Olivier Beuf1
1Univ. Lyon, INSA-Lyon, Université Lyon 1, UJM-Saint Etienne, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS, UMR 5220, U1206, Villeurbanne, France, 2Université de Savoie, IMEP-LAHC, UMR 5130, Le Bourget-du-Lac, France, 3KAPTEOS, Sainte-Hélène-du-Lac, France
Synopsis
The large majority of receiver clinical
MR coil are using cables between the resonant coil and Connector plug. To
remove possible induced currents on the cable’s shield, circuits such as RF traps
are distributed along the cable. This is done to ensure patients’ safety during
the exam. RF-traps are difficult to miniaturize and are not fit for inner coils
such as endoluminal coils. Optical fibers would be a smart option to get rid of
this critical drawback but this requires electro-optical conversion devices.
This abstract presents the first
images obtained at 7T with an electro-optical conversion based on Pockel’s effect.
Introduction
To ensure patients’ safety, several
norms exist to govern MRI exams, some of which set the maximal SAR1
(To avoid any increase superior to 1C° of temperature). Nevertheless, it can be
challenging to estimate properly the local SAR. In addition to time-varying
gradients and radiofrequency impulsions B1, the galvanic link between the coil
and the MRI console is a matter of concern. Common mode currents can appear in
the outer conductor of the coaxial cable while being exposed to RF excitation of
NMR sequences. Resulting standing waves along the cable show some electrical field
concentration zones and currents can be induced in the patient’s tissues, potentially
provoking burns2. Circuits such as cable traps3 are
commonly used to minimize that effect, but at the cost of cable inflexibility, increased
cable diameter and additional weight, which can be problematic in certain conditions
(arrays of surface coils, endoluminal coils). It is also worth noting that this
problem increases along with the static magnetic field. An optical link on the
other hand would address all these issues.
In this work, an EO modulation of NMR signal making use of Pockel’s effect was
used and transmitted by optical fibers before being electrically converted to
be processed by NMR system.Methods
All acquisitions were performed on
a 7T preclinical MRI scanner (Bruker, Germany) at the proton frequency of
300.13MHz. A quadrature 23mm inner diameter volume coil was used (RapidBiomed,
Germany). The coil was interfaced with a quadrature hybrid coupler giving
access separately to transmit and receive signals. The receive port is
connected to the RF port of the electro optic (EO) commercial modulator, a LN82S-FC
(Thorlabs, Germany) 15GHz band intensity modulator. As the electrical field
varies through the modulator’s lithium niobate crystal, it changes its refractive
index. Half of the light emitted by the laser goes through the crystal and the
change of refractive index induces a change of phase. The light recombines, (constructively
or destructively), effectively modulating the light intensity according to the
electrical receiver NMR signal. Input and output optical ports of the modulator
are connected to an EoSense (Kapteos, France). This apparatus includes the
laser source, the detection circuit (photodiode, amplifier, etc.) converting
the signal back into electric signal. The EoSense output is connected to preamplifier
(HPPR module) of the MRI console. The Figure 1 summarizes the whole setup of
conversion. The Phantom imaged consists in a 15mm diameter tube filled with a
solution of 5g/l NaCl and 1.25g/l NiSo4. Acquisitions are alternatively performed
with galvanic cable (path A) and with the optical conversion bench (path B) for
comparison. A spectrum analyzer (Keysight, USA) is used to monitor the signal for
both configurations (out of the coil and out of the OE conversion). This
monitoring is also performed without phase encoding gradient. The sequence used
is a 2D gradient Echo with an echo time of 2.5ms, a repetition time of 30ms and
a flip angle of 30°.Results
Representatives images acquired with both paths are shown
in figure 2. The principle of the optical conversion is effective and the MRI
console was able to reconstruct an image of the phantom. The SNR however was
significantly deteriorated by the optical conversion, to a thirty factor. The signal
measured on the spectrum analyzer (Figure 3) without phase encoding gradient shows
that with a narrow resolution bandwidth (100 KHz), the dynamic range of the
signal with the noise floor level measured for both paths are the same. This fact indicates that instead
of reducing the amplitude of the signal, there is a significant additional
source of noise in the conversion.Discussion
There are many means of
improvement, the most important being the modulator. Like most EO devices, it
was developed for telecommunications networks. The large bandwidth (several
GHz) needed for those applications is counterproductive here, as the product
bandwidth-sensibility is a constant for a given topology4. We are
working with research partners to build a modulator with a 500MHz bandwidth. A
study of the behaviour of the laser and photodiode according to optical power should
give more information on eventual others sources of noise. Secondly the
amplifier of the photodiode is wideband, which adds noise on frequencies unused
in our sequence (50KHz of useful bandwidth in this case). Developing a bandpass
filter with narrower bandwidth than the MRI’s (5MHz) would cancel part of that
noise. Conclusion
The principle of the NMR Electro optical conversion using
Pockel’s effect is currently working at 7T, but the SNR needs to be preserved to
remain suitable and attractive. Improvements at several stages of the EO
conversion, along with real time electrical field monitoring5 have
to be further performed.Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the AURA
region and performed within the scope of LABEX PRIMES (ANR-11-LABX-0063).
Experiments were performed on the PILoT facility, part of the France Life
Imaging infrastructure (ANR-11-INBS-0006).References
1. IEC 60601-2-33 (https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/22705)
2. Dempsey, Mary F.,
Barrie Condon, et Donald M. Hadley. « Investigation of the Factors
Responsible for Burns during MRI ». Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
13, nᵒ 4 (1 avril 2001): 627‑31. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1088.
3. Peterson & al« Common
Mode Signal Rejection Methods for MRI: Reduction of Cable Shield Currents for
High Static Magnetic Field Systems ». Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part
B: Magnetic Resonance Engineering 19B, nᵒ 1 (1 janvier 2003): 1‑8. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmr.b.10090.
4. R. C. Williamson, "Sensitivity–bandwidth product
for electro-optic modulators," Opt. Lett. 26, 1362-1363 (2001)
5.
I. Saniour et al. (2017). Electro-optic probe for real time assessments of RF
electric field produced in an MRI scanner: Feasibility tests at 3 and 4.7
Tesla. NMR in
Biomedicine. Vol 31. No 1.