Sebastian Dietrich1, Johannes Mayer1, Christoph Stephan Aigner1, Christoph Kolbitsch1, Jeanette Schulz-Menger2,3,4, Tobias Schaeffter1,5, and Sebastian Schmitter1,6
1Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig and Berin, Germany, 2Charité Medical Faculty University Medicine, Berlin, Germany, 3DZHK partner site Berlin, Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC), Berlin, Germany, 4Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, HELIOS Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany, 5Department of Medical Engineering, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 6University of Minnesota, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Minneapolis, MN, United States
Synopsis
This
work demonstrates 3D respiratory motion-corrected and cardiac resolved
fat-water separation in the human body at 7T. Accurate fat fraction
quantification using bipolar readout gradients was validated in a phantom. The impact
of motion compensation on the underlying motion resolved $$$\Delta\text{B0}$$$ maps is investigated
and estimated. In total the 3D fat-water separation and fat fraction
quantification is successfully demonstrated in 10 healthy volunteers at 7T with a
large BMI range from $$$19$$$ to $$$34 \text{kg/m}²$$$.
Introduction
Fat-water imaging of
the entire heart benefits from ultra-high fields (UHF) due to higher SNR and better
spectral separation of the chemical components. However, at UHF the
inhomogeneous spatial distribution of the transmit (Tx) magnetic field ($$$\text{B}_1^+$$$) can lead to contrast variations and to signal
cancellation1. Furthermore, the respiratory motion, cardiac motion,
and blood flow can lead to artifacts and increased acquisition times for 3D cardiac
magnetic resonance (CMR) images. At lower fields, respiration-induced artifacts
are commonly reduced by using 1D/2D respiratory navigators. At UHF, however,
such navigators often fail due to signal cancellations2,3.
Alternatively, breath holds scan can be performed for 2D scans, but this is
likely to fail for 3D acquisition due to scan time limitations.
In this work, we
investigate the feasibility of a free-breathing 3D whole heart fat-water imaging
approach introduced at 1.5T4 and additionally generate 3D respiration resolved ΔB0 maps for use at
7T. A radial phase encoding (RPE)5,6 acquisition allowed for respiratory self-navigation, non-rigid motion
correction and retrospective cardiac binning for accurate fat quantification at
(1.4mm)³ isotropic resolution.Methods
All scans were
performed on a 7T with 8-channel pTx system (Magnetom 7T, Siemens, Germany) and
a 32-element torso coil array
(MRI.TOOLS, Berlin, Germany) driven in 8Tx/32Rx mode. RF power of each
Tx channel was restricted to meet SAR limits. In-vivo measurements were
performed
according to an IRB approved protocol. A phantom filled with water, $$$2\%~$$$agarose, $$$0.2\%~$$$NaCl, $$$0.1\%~$$$CuSO4 ($$$σ=0.4\,\text{S/m}, ε_r=80$$$) containing three tubes filled with a $$$25\%/50\%/100\%$$$ olive-oil emulsion in agarose
gel was used to validate the acquisition and fat-water reconstruction at 7T. Ten
healthy volunteers ($$$7\text{m}$$$/$$$3\text{f}$$$, $$$21\text{-}35\text{y}$$$, mean:$$$30\text{y}$$$) with a wide BMI range ($$$19.9\text{-}34.0\,\text{kg/m}²,~\text{mean:}23.9\,\text{kg/m}$$$) were scanned in the supine
position.
Fig.1 shows the applied
workflow to achieve respiratory motion-corrected and cardiac resolved 3D
fat-water images at 7T.
3D non-respiratory
resolved
$$$\text{B}_1^+$$$ maps obtained under
shallow breathing were acquired in all subjects (see Fig.1(A)) with nominal flip
angle ($$$\text{FA}$$$) of $$$20°$$$ (echo/repetition time ($$$\text{TE/TR}$$$)$$$~$$$of$$$~2.0/40.0\,\text{ms}$$$, field-of-view $$$\text{(FOV)}~$$$of$$$~250\times\,312\times\,312\,\text{mm}^3$$$,$$$~\text{resolution}=(4\,\text{mm})^3$$$) with an acquisition time ($$$\text{TA}$$$) of$$$~3.41\,\text{ms}$$$ to obtain a homogeneous
subject-specific phase-only shim for the human heart.7
Subsequently, a triple-echo
3D spoiled gradient echo (GRE) acquisition with RPE trajectory and bipolar
readout was acquired during free-breathing covering a$$$~\text{FOV}=250\times\,312\text{-}350\times\,312\text{-}350\,\text{mm}^3$$$ with $$$(1.4\,\text{mm})^3$$$ isotropic resolution
($$$\text{TE1/TE2/TE3/TR}=1.51/2.79/4.07/6.10\,\text{ms}$$$, actual $$$\text{FA}\approx5\,°$$$7) in $$$\text{TA}=9.17\,\text{min}$$$ (see Fig.1(B)).
First,
three datasets with different TEs were reconstructed without any motion
compensation to determine the bipolar readout correction factors. Subsequently,
data from the first echo was split into four respiratory states using
self-navigation and reconstructed using iterative SENSE8. 3D non-rigid
motion vector fields (MF) describing the pixels displacements relative to
end-expiration are derived from these respiration-resolved datasets9
(see Fig.1(C)). These MF were used for
motion-corrected image reconstruction10 for all TEs. Furthermore, respiratory-motion
corrected and respiration-resolved data is used to obtain $$$\Delta\text{B0}$$$ maps as described in ref. 11. Respiration-resolved data reconstruction
included a total variation constraint along the respiratory dimension. Then,
the bipolar and respiratory motion-corrected GRE data was split into five different cardiac phases using the recorded ECG signal (see Fig.1(D)). The
acquisition window of each phase depends on the heart rate and corresponds to
$$$\approx 200\,\text{ms}$$$ per cardiac cycle and the acceleration factor per bin is $$$\text{R}=3.2$$$.
Therefore, a
total-variation-based regularization12 along the cardiac phases and
spatial position in combination with a 6-peak spectral model12 of
fat was used to reconstruct directly respiratory motion-corrected and cardiac
resolved fat (F) and water (W) magnitude information (see Fig.1(E)). Fat fraction ($$$\text{FF}$$$)
images were calculated by $$\text{FF}=\frac{\text{F}}{\text{W}+\text{F}}\,.$$Results/Discussion
Fig.2 shows phantom images at the three different echo times and corresponding water, fat, and FF images. The line plot indicates a reasonable
match between mixed oil/water-agarose fraction and MR quantification in the
tubes with mean (standard deviation) values over the entire volume of $$$28(7)\%/45(7)\%/92(5)\%$$$ for the $$$25\%/50\%/100\%$$$ fat compartments.
Fig.3 illustrates
reconstructed respiration-resolved (A) and respiration-corrected (B) $$$\Delta\text{B0}$$$ maps with $$$\Delta\text{B0}=\pm90\,\text{Hz}$$$ averaged over the whole heart in
end-expiration. Similar 2D
$$$\Delta\text{B0}$$$ maps have been shown by
ref.13 for a default
$$$\Delta\text{B0}$$$ shim setting. Absolute differences between
end-expiration and motion-corrected respiratory phases (C) increase from
end-expiration to end-inspiration with a maximum difference of $$$\pm\,24\,\text{Hz}$$$ for the
whole heart. Such changes are regarded as small compared to the overall
$$$\Delta\text{B0}$$$ range of $$$[-300\,\text{-}\,300\,\text{Hz}]$$$ which justifies the use of respiratory motion-corrected
information for fat-water separation.
Fig.4 shows non-respiratory
and non-cardiac resolved and respiratory motion-corrected, cardiac resolved
(diastole) fat-water, and $$$\text{FF}$$$ images of the heart. Dotted lines indicate the
spatial position of line plot data and the red arrows indicate flow
artifacts in both, $$$\text{FF}$$$ maps and line plot. Quantitatively, local $$$\text{FF}$$$ is increased
up to 24% and the $$$\text{FF}$$$ in the blood pool is reduced by the factor of two due to the reduced
blood flow in the reconstructed diastolic phase.
Fig.5
illustrates the results of all 10 volunteers in 3 orientations with
corresponding $$$\text{FF}$$$ with successful fat/water separation.Conclusion
In this work, we demonstrate
respiratory motion-corrected 3D cardiac fat-water images and $$$\Delta\text{B0}$$$ maps at 7T without
$$$\text{B}_1^+$$$-related signal voids within the heart and overall good image
quality. This work extends the field of CMR applications at 7T and it may
help to push future 7T body imaging, also for other organs.Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge funding from the
German Research Foundation SCHM 2677/2-1 and GRK2260, BIOQIC.References
1. Padormo, Beqiri, Hajnal, Malik, NMR in Biomedicine
29:1145-1161 (2016)
2. Ladd, Bachert, Meyerspeer, Moser,
Nagel et al., Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 109:1–50 (2018).
3. Schmitter, Schnell,
Uğurbil, Markl, Van de Moortele, JMRI
44:486–99 (2016)
4. Kolbitsch, Mayer,
Cipriani, Blaszczyk, Schulz-Menger et al., Proc ISMRM 27, Abstract 0402 (2019)
5. Prieto, Uribe, Razavi, Atkinson,
Schaeffter, MRM 68:514-526 (2010)
6. Buerger, Clough, King, Schaeffter,
Prieto, Trans Med Imaging 31: 805-815 (2012)
7. Dietrich, Aigner,
Kolbitsch, Ludwig, Mayer et al., MRM DOI:10.1002/mrm.28602 (2020)
8. Pruessmann, Weiger,
Peter, Boesiger, MRM 46:638–51, (2001)
9. Jackson, Meyer, Nishimura, Macovski, IEEE Transactions on Medical
Imaging 10: 473–478 (1991)
10. Kolbitsch, Bastkowski, Schäffter, Prieto, Weiss, et al., MRM 83:635–44 (2020)
11. Berglund, Johansson, Ahlström, Kullberg, MRM
63:1659-1668, (2010)
12. Benkert, Feng, Sodickson,
Chandarana, Block KT, MRM 78:565–76, (2017)
13. Hock, Terekhov, Stefanescu,
Lohr, Herz, Reiter et al., MRM 85:182–96, (2021)