Malte Riedel (né Steinhoff)1, Kawin Setsompop2,3,4, Alfred Mertins1, and Peter Börnert5,6
1Institute for Signal Processing, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany, 2Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, United States, 3Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States, 4Harvard‐MIT Health Sciences and Technology, MIT, Cambridge, MA, United States, 5Philips Research, Hamburg, Germany, 6Department of Radiology, C.J. Gorter Center for High-Field MRI, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
Synopsis
This work aims at
improving the robustness of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) against 3D rigid head
motion based on simultaneous multi-slice (SMS), interleaved echo-planar imaging
(EPI) and image navigators. The
proposed method utilizes low-resolution navigators to estimate diffusion phases
as well as shot-wise 3D rigid motion through SMS-to-volume registration;
providing high temporal resolution motion correction capability. The shot parameters are included into a
full-volume reconstruction of the image data per diffusion direction. The method
achieves submillimeter registration errors and improved image quality. In conclusion, the presented method enables
retrospective 3D rigid motion correction for interleaved SMS DWI.
Introduction
Multi-shot DWI
techniques are entering clinical practice overcoming current technical
limitations in resolution and SNR of the prevalent single-shot EPI acquisitions1. The motion sensitive and rather lengthy multi-shot
diffusion-weighted scans suffer from shot phase variations and gross motion1. In-plane gross motion can be addressed by
dedicated model-based image reconstructions2, but through-plane motion remains challenging.
At the same time, simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) acquisitions with controlled
aliasing schemes offer scan time reductions at moderate g-factor penalty for
interleaved EPI3,4 and provide data support for motion estimation
in the through-plane direction per EPI-shot. Recently, SMS-to-volume
registration approaches have been proposed for fMRI5 and DTI modeling6 to obtain and correct for shot-wise 3D rigid
motion parameters. In this work, we introduce such a method for DWI image reconstruction and propose an algorithm, termed motion-aware SMS-accelerated and
interleaved image creation (MoSaIC), with navigated 3D rigid motion correction in
the brain.Methods
Image Reconstruction
Model
An SMS extension4 of a navigated Stejskal-Tanner sequence7 is used to acquire interleaved high-resolution
image data at the first spin echo and moderately undersampled low-resolution navigator
data at the second. The SENSE-based8 data discrepancy functional for interleaved SMS
DWI is stated as
$$\underset{\boldsymbol{\rho}}{\mathrm{minimize}}\quad\lVert{M}\,{F}\,{\Theta}\,{C}\,{\Phi}\,{H}\,{\Omega}\;{\boldsymbol{\rho}}-\boldsymbol{b}\rVert_2^2 + {\alpha}\,\lVert{W}\boldsymbol{\rho}\rVert_2^2,$$ where
$$$\boldsymbol{\rho}\in\mathbb{C}^{N_p}$$$ is the image volume with
$$$N_{p}=N_{x}N_{y}N_{z}$$$ pixels and
$$$\boldsymbol{b}\in\mathbb{C}^{N_b}$$$
is the acquired k-space data. The forward
model contains the macroscopic motion operator
$$$\Omega$$$ ($$$N_{shots}N_p{\times}N_p$$$) applying the
shot transformation. The slice sampling operator
$$$H$$$ ($$$N_{shots}N_{MB}N_{y}N_{x}{\times}N_{shots}N_{p}$$$) selects the
$$$N_{MB}$$$ SMS slices per shot. The SMS slices are
weighted by the diffusion phases using
$$$\Phi$$$ ($$$N_{shots}N_{MB}N_{y}N_{x}{\times}N_{shots}N_{MB}N_{y}N_{x}$$$) and the
$$$N_{c}$$$ coil sensitivities using
$$$C$$$ ($$$N_{c}N_{shots}N_{MB}N_{y}N_{x}{\times}N_{shots}N_{MB}N_{y}N_{x}$$$). The CAIPI
operator
$$$\Theta$$$ ($$$N_{c}N_{shots}N_{y}N_{x}{\times}N_{c}N_{shots}N_{MB}N_{y}N_{x}$$$) applies CAIPI
shifts and adds the SMS slices. For EPI (with gridded ramp samples),
$$$F$$$ applies the Fourier transform along the phase-encoding
direction and
$$$M$$$ the sampling mask ($$$N_{b}{\times}N_{c}N_{shots}N_{y}N_{x}$$$). A weighted
Tikhonov regularization is added with parameter
$$$\alpha$$$ and a weight matrix
$$$W=\mathrm{diag}(w_{p}^{-1})$$$ with a reference image $$$\boldsymbol{w}\in\mathbb{R}^{N_p}$$$. The shot
parameters for
$$$\Phi$$$ and
$$$\Omega$$$ are estimated from low-resolution image navigator
data, sampled for each SMS interleaf7, so that the full-volume
reconstruction is convex.
Navigated
Algorithm
The algorithm,
visualized in Fig. 1, comprises three main steps, namely: navigator
reconstruction, shot parameter estimation from the navigators, and full-volume
reconstruction. First, the navigator data, which is undersampled in phase-encoding
and slice direction, is unfolded by 2D-SENSE9. Second, the simultaneous navigator slices are
registered to a reference volume by a SMS-to-volume (SMS2Vol) registration
scheme, which is implemented in SimpleITK10 and shown schematically in Fig. 2, yielding
the 3D rigid shot motion parameters. The low-resolution navigator phases are
extracted for shot- and slice-wise physiological motion correction. Shots whose
l2-norm energy of the navigator signal drops below 5 times the median absolute
deviation over all diffusion-weighted shots are rejected.
The full-volume
reconstruction is solved by conjugate gradients with intensity correction8. The rigid motion operator is constructed as
proposed by Cordero-Grande et al.11. The algorithm is compared to a navigated
SMS-MUSE3 implementation without intra-volume gross
motion correction, called SMS-IRIS. Fractional anisotropy (FA) maps were
calculated after affine alignment of the volumes per diffusion direction using
Dipy12.
Acquisition
DTI with 4 EPI
interleaves, 3 simultaneous slices and 15 diffusion directions at 1000 s/mm2
was performed on a 3T Philips Ingenia scanner with a 32-channel head coil. Image
echo parameters were FOV (R x P x S) = 232 x 228 x 120 mm3,
resolution = 1.0 x 1.0 x 4.0 mm3, TR = 3 s, TE = 70 ms, FOV/3 CAIPI
shift and partial Fourier factor 0.632. The navigator data was acquired at TEnav
= 145 ms, 5 mm in-plane resolution, 1.62 in-plane acceleration and FOV/2 CAIPI
shift. SPIR was used for fat suppression, and the total scan time was 3:30 min.
The DTI scans were
performed twice in five healthy volunteers, first, without motion (static) and,
second, with motion. For motion scans, the subjects were asked to remain still
in the first third, perform in-plane head shake motion in the second and
through-plane nodding motion in the third. Informed consent was attained
according to the rules of the institution. Coil reference data was acquired in
a gradient-echo prescan.Results
Figure 3 shows the
reconstruction and registration performance in different simulated motion
scenarios generated from static in-vivo data. The low-resolution navigator
analysis enables sub-millimeter target registration errors (TRE)13 and improved image quality for both in- and
through-plane motion components. MoSaIC’s motion detection helps reducing
errors and computational load in the absence of motion. Motion-corrected in-vivo
DWI image volumes and the rigid shot motion parameters are presented in Fig. 4 for
different motion cases. Figure 5 compares FA results for in-vivo DTI.Discussion
SMS-to-volume
registration, which is itself challenging, is further complicated by the multi-contrast
and low-SNR nature of DWI. The presented registration achieves improved
image quality over all investigated motion scenarios. Reducing the slice
thickness leads to insufficient SNR for the presented method, which currently prevents
isotropic DWI and could be addressed in future work by improved slice encoding strategies14.Conclusion
The navigated MoSaIC algorithm
integrates the through-plane motion problem to support retrospective full 3D
rigid motion correction in interleaved SMS DWI reconstructions, improving image
quality in the presence of head motion.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Wu
W, Miller KL. Image formation in diffusion MRI: A review of recent technical
developments: Review of Image Formation in dMRI. JMRI.
2017;46(3):646-662. doi:10.1002/jmri.25664
2. Guhaniyogi S, Chu M-L, Chang H-C,
Song AW, Chen N. Motion immune diffusion imaging using augmented MUSE for
high-resolution multi-shot EPI: Motion Immune Diffusion Imaging Using AMUSE. MRM.
2016;75(2):639-652. doi:10.1002/mrm.25624
3. Chang H-C, Guhaniyogi S, Chen N.
Interleaved diffusion-weighted improved by adaptive partial-Fourier and
multiband multiplexed sensitivity-encoding reconstruction: Reconstruction
Framework for Artifact-Free DWI. MRM.
2015;73(5):1872-1884. doi:10.1002/mrm.25318
4. Dai E, Ma X, Zhang Z, Yuan C, Guo H.
Simultaneous multislice accelerated interleaved EPI DWI using generalized
blipped-CAIPI acquisition and 3D K-space reconstruction: SMS Accelerated iEPI
DWI. MRM. 2017;77(4):1593-1605. doi:10.1002/mrm.26249
5. Hoinkiss DC, Erhard P, Breutigam N-J,
von Samson-Himmelstjerna F, Günther M, Porter DA. Prospective motion correction in functional
MRI using simultaneous multislice imaging and multislice-to-volume image
registration. NeuroImage. 2019;200:159-173. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.042
6. Marami B, Scherrer B,
Khan S, et al. Motion-robust
diffusion compartment imaging using simultaneous multi-slice acquisition. MRM. 2019;81(5):3314-3329. doi:10.1002/mrm.27613
7. Jeong H-K, Gore JC, Anderson AW.
High-resolution human diffusion tensor imaging using 2-D navigated multishot
SENSE EPI at 7 T. MRM. 2013;69(3):793-802. doi:10.1002/mrm.24320
8. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Börnert P,
Boesiger P. Advances in sensitivity encoding with arbitrary k-space
trajectories. MRM. 2001;46(4):638–651.
9. Zahneisen B, Ernst T, Poser BA. SENSE
and simultaneous multislice imaging: SENSE and Simultaneous Multislice Imaging.
MRM. 2015;74(5):1356-1362. doi:10.1002/mrm.25519
10. Beare R, Lowekamp B, Yaniv Z. Image
Segmentation, Registration and Characterization in R with SimpleITK.
J Stat Soft. 2018;86(8). doi:10.18637/jss.v086.i08
11. Cordero-Grande L, Teixeira RPAG, Hughes
EJ, Hutter J, Price AN, Hajnal JV. Sensitivity Encoding for Aligned Multishot
Magnetic Resonance Reconstruction. IEEE Transactions on Computational
Imaging. 2016;2(3):266-280. doi:10.1109/TCI.2016.2557069
12. Garyfallidis E, Brett M, Amirbekian B,
et al. Dipy, a library for the analysis of diffusion MRI data. Frontiers in
neuroinformatics. 2014;8:8.
13. Kuklisova-Murgasova M, Quaghebeur G,
Rutherford MA, Hajnal JV, Schnabel JA. Reconstruction of fetal brain MRI with
intensity matching and complete outlier removal. Medical Image Analysis.
2012;16(8):1550-1564. doi:10.1016/j.media.2012.07.004
14. Setsompop K, Fan Q, Stockmann J, et al.
High-resolution in vivo diffusion imaging of the human brain with generalized
slice dithered enhanced resolution: Simultaneous multislice (gSlider-SMS):
High-Resolution Diffusion Imaging With gSlider-SMS. MRM.
2018;79(1):141-151. doi:10.1002/mrm.26653