Lisha Yuan1, Qing Li2, Guojing Wei3, Hongjian He1, and Jianhui Zhong4
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Brain Imaging Science and Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 2MR Collaborations, Siemens Healthcare Ltd., Shanghai, China, 3SHS DI MR R&D SZN LP, Siemens Shenzhen Magnetic Resonance Ltd., Shenzhen, China, 4Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States
Synopsis
Since both imaging and diffusion gradient pulses could lead to
significant diffusion-related signal attenuation, one
must account for the effect of all imaging and diffusion gradient pulses to achieve
an accurate estimation of diffusion metrics and tensors. Based on a generalized
definition of b matrix, a general framework for
an automated and accurate b-matrix calculation was proposed in this
study. Its correctness was verified in SE-diffusion sequence, and the importance of accurate
inclusion of all gradient pulses was shown in both SE- and SPEN-diffusion sequence. The
proposed method is suitable for accurate evaluation of diffusion effects in various
sequences.
Introduction
With gradients pulses inserted into an MRI imaging sequence, so-called
diffusion-weighted images are obtained to depict the random movement of water
molecules, providing valuable information regarding the microstructure of
tissues1. Usually, only diffusion gradients were considered to
account for the diffusion-related attenuation effects. However, the diffusion
effect from imaging gradients was not always ignorable. In such cases, all
gradient pulses should be taken into consideration for accurate b-factor or
b-matrix calculations.
Commonly, b-matrix can be obtained using experimental
evaluation, numerical calculation, or analytic solution. An experimental method
needs a dedicated phantom to calibrate the diffusion coefficient, while the numerical
and analytical calculations become tricky (sometimes unsolvable) when dealing
with complicated imaging pulse sequences. Calibrations with all the methods may
also depend on specific imaging parameters. In this study, a
general framework was proposed for an automated and accurate calculation of b
matrix, which considers the effects of all gradient pulses. Two examples were
provided to indicate where such accurate b-matrix calculation is necessary.Methods
A generalized definition of b matrix
Given the gradient pulse $$$\textbf{G}(t)=\left[G_{x}(t), G_{y}(t), G_{z}(t)\right]$$$
, a generalized analytical expression of the b
matrix can be expressed as follows2,
$$\textbf{b}=\gamma^{2}\int_{0}^{TE} \left[\textbf{F}(t)-2\xi(t)\textbf{f} \right]^{T} \left[\textbf{F}(t)-2\xi(t)\textbf{f} \right]dt \hspace{1cm}[1]$$
Here
$$$\textbf{F}(t)=\int_{0}^{t} \textbf{G}(t^{'})dt^{'}$$$ is a piecewise function summarizing the action
of all gradients of each axis up to a particular time t, and TE is the effective
echo time. For a 2D spin echo (SE)2
or
SE-EPI sequence3,
$$$f=F(\frac{1}{2}TE)$$$ was
recorded to account for the antiphase effect of the180° RF pulse. Besides, $$$\xi(t)=0$$$ when $$$0 \leq t \leq \frac{1}{2}TE$$$, and $$$\xi(t)=1$$$ when $$$\frac{1}{2}TE \leq t \leq TE$$$
. Based on Eq. [1] and vector multiplication principle, the element of the
b matrix containing contributions from interactions between gradient pulses
applied along the same or orthogonal directions could be obtained,
$$b_{ij}=\gamma^{2}\int_{0}^{TE} \left[F_{i}(t)-2\xi(t)F_{i}\left(\frac{1}{2}TE\right)\right] \left[F_{j}(t)-2\xi(t)F_{j}\left(\frac{1}{2}TE\right)\right]dt \hspace{1cm}[2]$$
The indexes i and j indicate the
coordinate directions in which the gradient pulses are applied (i.e. the read,
phase, or slice direction).
A general framework for an automated and accurate
b-matrix calculation
Based on the acquisition protocols, the sequence timing (as in Figure 1a) was
simulated according to the specific scanner platform. Taking the
effect of all gradient pulses into account, a general framework was proposed in
this study to achieve an automated and accurate b-matrix calculation. A detailed schematic of the
processing pipeline was shown in Figure 1b.Results
Here two dMRI sequences were listed as examples
indicating the necessity of accurate calculation in the cases where imaging gradients have a significant diffusion-related
attenuation effect.
Case 1:
spin-echo (SE) imaging sequence
As indicated in a previous study2, attention should be paid to the diffusion-related signal attenuation caused by the
imaging gradients of SE sequence when there is a pair of
crusher gradients or the read-dephase gradient is not rephased immediately (see
Figure 2). To confirm the significant impact of imaging gradients as well as
the validity of our method, the diagonal elements of the b matrix were calculated using our proposed framework and compared with those analytical expressions derived in ref. [2].
Based on the simulation protocol in ref. [2], Table 1 showed that the numerical
b-matrix calculated from our method is consistent with the analytical values.
Moreover, the read-dephase gradient had a significant effect on the bread
when there is no Gcrusher and no Gdiff applied. Furthermore, with the increasing amplitude, crusher gradients had an increased effect on the diagonal elements of the b matrix even when Gdiff = 0 mT/m.
Case 2:
spatial-temporal encoding (SPEN) sequence
SPEN sequence4 has
received wide attention due to its significantly reduced geometric and
intensity distortions. For this sequence (Figure 3a), the
interaction between the excitation and diffusion gradient pulses produces non-negligible “cross-terms”, and the unique excitation instant for each position leads to spatial-dependent b-values
along the SPEN-axis5. In this study, the diffusion gradients were
applied only along SPEN-axis to illustrate the effect of excitation gradient on the element $$$b_{yy}$$$ calculation. Given the excitation gradient with a positive polarity and chirp pulse with the
symmetric linear decreasing frequency, the negative end of the sample along
SPEN axis ($$$y=-L_{y}/2$$$) was
excited last but refocused first, resulting in a minimal effect of imaging
gradients.
Figure 3 illustrated the SPEN sequence and its $$$b_{yy}$$$ values along
SPEN axis. It showed that the values at $$$y=-L_{y}/2$$$ were basically unaffected if
the imaging gradients were ignored. By
contrast, the $$$b_{yy}$$$ values at $$$y=L_{y}/2$$$
had a large
deviation from the accurate value when the effects of imaging gradients were
not considered.Discussion and Conclusion
In this study, a general framework was proposed to calculate
b matrix automatically and accurately based on the sequence timing. The accurate calculation proved to be necessary
in the cases where the imaging gradients have a significant diffusion-related attenuation effect. In
the future, the importance of the accurate b-matrix calculation can also be
explored in the cases where small disturbances of b value significantly affect
the results, such as in the application of the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)
model6, or in cases where effective diffusion weighting may be
altered by significant susceptibility changes, such as injection of contrast
agent7,8.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Le
Bihan D., 2011. Chapter 5: Magnetic resonance diffusion imaging: Introduction
and concepts. In: Jones, D.K. (Ed.), Diffusion MRI: Theory, Methods, and
Applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, pp. 57–78.
2. Mattiello J, Basser PJ, Le Bihan D. Analytical
expressions for the b matrix in NMR diffusion imaging and
Spectroscopy. J. Magn. Reson., 1994; 108: 131– 141.
3. Mattiello J, Basser PJ, Le Bihan D. The b‐matrix
in diffusion tensor echo‐planar imaging. Magn. Reson. Med., 1997; 37: 292– 300.
4. Chen Y, Li J, Qu X, et al.
Partial Fourier transform reconstruction for single-shot MRI with linear
frequency-swept excitation. Magn. Reson. Med., 2013,
69(5):1326-1336.
5.
Solomon E, Shemesh N, Frydman L. Diffusion weighted MRI by spatiotemporal
encoding: Analytical description and in vivo validations. J. Magn. Reson., 2013, 232:76-86.
6. Le
Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M.
Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR
imaging. Radiology, 1988; 168:497-505.
7. Zhong JH; Kennan RP; Gore JC. Effects of Susceptibility Variations on NMR Measurements of
Diffusion. J. Magn. Reson., 1991; 95: 267.
8. Does MD; Zhong JH; Gore JC.
In-Vivo Measurement of ADC Change Due to Intravascular Susceptibility
Variation. Magn. Reson. Med., 1998; 41: 236.