1345

Highly-Accelerated Multi-shot Diffusion Imaging with High Angular Resolution Enabled by k-d SVD
Shihui Chen1 and Hing-Chiu Chang1
1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Synopsis

High angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI) is a useful tool for neuroscience research, but the widespread clinical applications are limited by its long scan time and low spatial resolution. Multiple strategies have been proposed to achieve in-plane acceleration to improve the scan efficiency and geometric fidelity for HARDI. However, the feasible in-plane acceleration factor is still limited by the number of coils and the noise amplification associated with parallel imaging reconstruction. In this study, we proposed a reconstruction method based on SVD for HARDI to achieve superior reconstruction performance, even when acceleration factor is greater than number of coils.

Introduction

Although multi-shot EPI with multiplexed sensitivity encoding (MUSE) can improve the spatial resolution and geometric accuracy for diffusion MRI1, MUSE is less feasible for the data acquisition of high angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI) due to increased scan time. Various acceleration methods based on undersampling in ky-d space have been proposed to achieve HARDI with improved scan efficiency and reduced distortion2-4. However, the in-plane acceleration factor (Rky) is limited by the number of coils because the data reconstruction still relies on parallel imaging5, 6. Previous studies showed that the dimensionality reduction approaches can transform the ill-conditioned reconstruction problem (e.g., Rky > number of coils) into overdetermined problem with predetermined features, such as k-t PCA7. In light of this, we proposed a k-d singular value decomposition (SVD) reconstruction method to achieve over 8-fold in-plane acceleration for multi-shot HARDI even using an 8-channel phase-array head coil.

Methods

Design of pulse sequence
Because SVD requires training data to identify the basis vectors, the 2D navigator echo is implemented into an interleaved diffusion-weighted EPI (DW-EPI) sequence to acquire the training data for SVD (Fig.1a). For the navigator echo, the number of kx sampling remains the same as imaging echo, but only 64 central ky lines is acquired with Rky=4. A previously reported smooth ordering of diffusion directions is used to acquire the HARDI data for reduced spectrum overlaps in y-kd space3 (Fig.2a).
Data reconstruction
Each spectrum in y-kd space can be approximated by a linear combination of a set of predetermined basis vectors because of its sparsity. To increase the incoherence, the acquired data are reordered along d-space, with an ascending order of gTDg(where g is the gradient vector and D is diffusion tensor transformation matrix) as shown in Fig.2b. After data reordering, first, the 4-fold undersampled 2D navigator data of each diffusion direction is reconstructed using conventional SENSE5, and then used to generate multi-channel data by multiplying with coil sensitivity profiles. Second, for the ky-d plane at each x location, the data is Fourier transformed to y-kd space, and SVD is performed on it to extract the basis vectors and the corresponding weighting coefficients ($$$w_{train,x}$$$). Third, the weighting coefficients for the reconstruction data ($$$w_{x}$$$) are calculated using least square method as shown in Eq.1, with the signal covariance matrix ($$$M_x^2$$$) pre-derived from $$$w_{train,x}$$$ using Eq.27.
$$$w_{x}=M_x^2E^{H}(EM_x^2E^{H}+\lambda I)^{+}P_{alias,x}$$$ (1)
where $$$E$$$ is encoding matrix that contains basis vectors and $$$P_{alias,x}$$$ is the aliasing pixel in the spatial position x.
$$$M_x^2=diag(|w_{train,x}|^{2})$$$ (2)
Fourth, the reconstructed data at y-kd space at each x location is recovered by multiplying the $$$w_{x}$$$ with the basis vectors, and then transformed to y-d space. Finally, the contrast compensation is performed for reconstructed images using the scaling factor calculated from the division between the reconstructed images and the phase-corrected training data8. The complete flowchart is shown in Fig.1b.
Hybrid simulation
Data acquisition: HARDI data were acquired from one healthy subject using an 8-channel head coil on a 1.5T GE scanner (Explorer, GE Healthcare) with following parameters: matrix size=128x128, number of shots=4, b=800s/mm2 with 64 diffusion directions, slice thickness=5mm, and TR/TE = 4350/72.4ms. The Nyquist ghost-corrected 4-shot HARDI data were firstly reconstructed using MUSE1, and considered as gold-standard images without any acceleration in data acquisition.
Simulation 1: Three strategies of data reconstruction using dimensionality reduction approaches and proposed pipeline were evaluated from the simulated data with Rky=8 (Fig.2g), including i) k-d PCA with re-ordering of diffusion data, and k-d SVD ii) with and iii) without re-ordering of diffusion data.
Simulation 2: The proposed k-d SVD reconstruction with re-ordering of diffusion data was evaluated for the simulated data with three different in-plane acceleration factors (Fig.2g; Rky=4, 8, and 16). Training data were generated from the SENSE-produced images of originally acquired ky segment (from the 4-shot data) with 64 central ky lines and Rky=4 (i.e., simulation of navigator echo). The 4-shot fully-sampled data was reconstructed using MUSE1 for comparison.

Results

Fig.3 shows the comparison of diffusion images produced from three strategies of data reconstruction using dimensionality reduction approaches and proposed pipeline. Fig.4 shows the comparison of the reconstructed images at different acceleration factors using proposed k-d SVD. Figure 5 shows the comparison of cFA maps produced from the data reconstructed with different methods and acceleration factors.

Discussion and conclusion

Our hybrid simulation demonstrates that the reconstruction performance of the proposed k-d SVD method for different in-plane acceleration factors (Rky=4, 8 and 16) is comparable with the MUSE-based method3 with Rky=4. From our evaluation, the performance of k-d SVD is affected by the order of diffusion data that requires an ascending order of gTDg for optimizing the performance (i.e., less error to gold standard). As expected, k-d SVD is better than k-d PCA because k-d SVD can preserve more features of direction-specific contrast. In addition, the reconstruction performance of k-d SVD may less rely on the available number of coils that makes high acceleration factor feasible, even with limited number of coils (i.e., Rky > number of coils). In conclusion, the proposed k-d SVD method can achieve high acceleration for multi-shot HARDI acquisition, without sacrificing the data quality and relying on the number of coils.

Acknowledgements

The work was in part supported by grants from Hong Kong Research Grant Council (GRFs HKU17121517 and HKU17106820) and Hong Kong Innovation and Technology Commission (ITS/403/18). We thank Tzu-Cheng Chao for useful discussion and the help on data acquisition.

References

1. Chen, N.-k., A. Guidon, H.-C. Chang, and A.W. Song. A robust multi-shot scan strategy for high-resolution diffusion weighted MRI enabled by multiplexed sensitivity-encoding (MUSE). Neuroimage. 2013; 72: 41-47.

2. Gao, H., L. Li, K. Zhang, W. Zhou, and X. Hu. PCLR: phase‐constrained low‐rank model for compressive diffusion‐weighted MRI. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2014; 72(5): 1330-1341.

3. Chao, T.C., J.y.G. Chiou, S.E. Maier, and B. Madore. Fast diffusion imaging with high angular resolution. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2017; 77(2): 696-706.

4. Wu, W., P.J. Koopmans, J.L. Andersson, and K.L. Miller. Diffusion acceleration with Gaussian process estimated reconstruction (DAGER). Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2019; 82(1): 107-125.

5. Pruessmann, K.P., M. Weiger, M.B. Scheidegger, and P. Boesiger. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 1999; 42(5): 952-962.

6. Griswold, M.A., P.M. Jakob, R.M. Heidemann, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: An Official Journal of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2002; 47(6): 1202-1210.

7. Pedersen, H., S. Kozerke, S. Ringgaard, K. Nehrke, and W.Y. Kim. k‐t PCA: temporally constrained k‐t BLAST reconstruction using principal component analysis. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: An Official Journal of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2009; 62(3): 706-716.

8. Wen, Q., C. Kodiweera, B.M. Dale, G. Shivraman, and Y.C. Wu. Rotating single‐shot acquisition (RoSA) with composite reconstruction for fast high‐resolution diffusion imaging. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2018; 79(1): 264-275.

Figures

Figure 1 (a) The proposed design of interleaved DW-EPI with navigator echo. The acceleration factor R of imaging can be 4, 8, or 16, while R for the navigator echo is fixed at 4. (b) The reconstruction pipeline based on proposed k-d SVD with contrast compensation at final step.

Figure 2 (a & b) The originally reported and proposed re-ordered d-space trajectory. (c & d) The spectrum in y-kd space corresponding to the originally reported and proposed re-ordered d-space trajectory respectively. (e & f) The degrees between neighbouring diffusion vectors before and after the reordering. (g) The ky-d trajectory with acceleration factor Rky = 4/8/16.

Figure 3 The comparison of reconstructed images with two representative directions for gold standard (first column), k-d SVD (second column)/k-d PCA (third column) with reordering of diffusion data, and k-d SVD with original ordering of diffusion data (fourth column) at R=8. The contrast differences were marked with red and green arrows in the images with 32nd and 64th diffusion direction respectively.

Figure 4 The comparison of reconstructed images with three representative directions for gold standard method (fully-sampled data using MUSE algorithm, first column), and our proposed k-d SVD method at R =4/8/16 (the last three columns).

Figure 5 (a)The comparison of colour FA map derived from gold standard images and the images reconstructed with the different strategies in Simulation 1. (b) The comparison of colour FA map derived from gold standard images and our proposed k-d SVD method at different acceleration factors (R = 4/8/16).

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 29 (2021)
1345