Shihui Chen1 and Hing-Chiu Chang1
1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Synopsis
High angular resolution
diffusion imaging (HARDI) is a useful tool for neuroscience research, but the
widespread clinical applications are limited by its long scan time and low spatial
resolution. Multiple strategies have been proposed to achieve in-plane
acceleration to improve the scan efficiency and geometric fidelity for HARDI.
However, the feasible in-plane acceleration factor is still limited by the
number of coils and the noise amplification associated with parallel imaging
reconstruction. In this study, we proposed a reconstruction method based on SVD
for HARDI to achieve superior reconstruction performance, even when acceleration
factor is greater than number of coils.
Introduction
Although multi-shot EPI
with multiplexed sensitivity encoding (MUSE) can improve the spatial resolution
and geometric accuracy for diffusion MRI1, MUSE is less
feasible for the data acquisition of high angular resolution diffusion imaging
(HARDI) due to increased scan time. Various acceleration methods based on
undersampling in ky-d
space have been proposed to achieve HARDI with improved scan efficiency and reduced
distortion2-4. However, the in-plane acceleration
factor (Rky) is limited by
the number of coils because the data reconstruction still relies on parallel
imaging5, 6. Previous studies
showed that the dimensionality reduction approaches can transform the ill-conditioned
reconstruction problem (e.g., Rky
> number of coils) into overdetermined problem with predetermined
features, such as k-t PCA7. In light of
this, we proposed a k-d singular
value decomposition (SVD) reconstruction method to achieve over 8-fold in-plane
acceleration for multi-shot HARDI even using an 8-channel phase-array head
coil.Methods
Design
of pulse sequence
Because SVD requires
training data to identify the basis vectors, the 2D navigator echo is
implemented into an interleaved diffusion-weighted EPI (DW-EPI) sequence to acquire the training data
for SVD (Fig.1a). For the navigator echo, the number of kx sampling remains the same as imaging echo, but only
64 central ky lines is
acquired with Rky=4. A
previously reported smooth ordering of diffusion directions
is used to acquire the HARDI data for reduced spectrum overlaps in y-kd space3 (Fig.2a).
Data
reconstruction
Each spectrum in y-kd space can be
approximated by a linear combination of a set of predetermined basis vectors
because of its sparsity. To increase the incoherence, the acquired data are
reordered along d-space, with an
ascending order of gTDg(where g is the gradient
vector and D is diffusion tensor transformation matrix) as shown in Fig.2b. After data
reordering, first, the 4-fold undersampled 2D navigator data of each diffusion
direction is reconstructed using conventional SENSE5, and then used to
generate multi-channel data by multiplying with coil sensitivity profiles. Second,
for the ky-d plane at each
x location, the data is Fourier
transformed to y-kd space,
and SVD is performed on it to extract the basis vectors and the corresponding
weighting coefficients ($$$w_{train,x}$$$). Third, the weighting coefficients
for the reconstruction data ($$$w_{x}$$$) are calculated using
least square method as shown in Eq.1, with the signal covariance matrix ($$$M_x^2$$$) pre-derived from $$$w_{train,x}$$$ using Eq.27.
$$$w_{x}=M_x^2E^{H}(EM_x^2E^{H}+\lambda I)^{+}P_{alias,x}$$$ (1)
where $$$E$$$ is encoding
matrix that contains basis vectors and $$$P_{alias,x}$$$ is the aliasing
pixel in the spatial position x.
$$$M_x^2=diag(|w_{train,x}|^{2})$$$ (2)
Fourth, the reconstructed
data at y-kd space at each
x location is recovered by multiplying
the $$$w_{x}$$$ with the basis vectors, and then transformed
to y-d space. Finally, the contrast
compensation is performed for reconstructed images using the scaling factor calculated
from the division between the reconstructed images and the phase-corrected training data8. The complete
flowchart is shown in Fig.1b.
Hybrid
simulation
Data
acquisition: HARDI data were acquired from one healthy
subject using an 8-channel head coil on a 1.5T GE scanner (Explorer, GE
Healthcare) with following parameters: matrix size=128x128, number of shots=4, b=800s/mm2
with 64 diffusion directions, slice thickness=5mm, and TR/TE = 4350/72.4ms. The Nyquist ghost-corrected 4-shot HARDI
data were firstly reconstructed using MUSE1, and considered
as gold-standard images without any acceleration in data acquisition.
Simulation 1: Three
strategies of data reconstruction using dimensionality reduction approaches and
proposed pipeline were evaluated from the simulated data with Rky=8
(Fig.2g), including i) k-d PCA with
re-ordering of diffusion data, and k-d
SVD ii) with and iii) without re-ordering of diffusion data.
Simulation
2:
The proposed k-d SVD reconstruction
with re-ordering of diffusion data was evaluated for the simulated data with three
different in-plane acceleration factors (Fig.2g; Rky=4, 8, and 16). Training data were generated from the
SENSE-produced images of originally acquired ky segment (from the 4-shot data) with 64 central ky lines and Rky=4 (i.e., simulation of
navigator echo). The 4-shot fully-sampled data was reconstructed using MUSE1 for comparison.
Results
Fig.3 shows the
comparison of diffusion images produced from three strategies of data
reconstruction using dimensionality reduction approaches and proposed pipeline.
Fig.4 shows the comparison of the reconstructed images at different
acceleration factors using proposed k-d
SVD. Figure 5 shows the comparison of cFA maps produced from the data
reconstructed with different methods and acceleration factors. Discussion and conclusion
Our hybrid simulation
demonstrates that the reconstruction performance of the proposed k-d SVD method for different in-plane
acceleration factors (Rky=4,
8 and 16) is comparable with the MUSE-based method3 with Rky=4. From our evaluation,
the performance of k-d SVD is affected
by the order of diffusion data that requires an ascending order of gTDg for optimizing the performance (i.e., less
error to gold standard). As expected, k-d
SVD is better than k-d PCA because k-d SVD can preserve more features of direction-specific
contrast. In addition, the reconstruction performance of k-d SVD may less rely on the available number of coils that makes
high acceleration factor feasible, even with limited number of coils (i.e., Rky > number of coils). In
conclusion, the proposed k-d SVD
method can achieve high acceleration for multi-shot HARDI acquisition, without
sacrificing the data quality and relying on the number of coils.Acknowledgements
The work was in part
supported by grants from Hong Kong Research Grant Council (GRFs HKU17121517 and
HKU17106820) and Hong Kong Innovation and Technology Commission (ITS/403/18).
We thank Tzu-Cheng Chao for useful discussion and the help on data acquisition. References
1. Chen,
N.-k., A. Guidon, H.-C. Chang, and A.W. Song. A robust multi-shot scan strategy for high-resolution diffusion
weighted MRI enabled by multiplexed sensitivity-encoding (MUSE).
Neuroimage. 2013; 72: 41-47.
2. Gao,
H., L. Li, K. Zhang, W. Zhou, and X. Hu. PCLR:
phase‐constrained low‐rank model for compressive diffusion‐weighted
MRI. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2014; 72(5): 1330-1341.
3. Chao,
T.C., J.y.G. Chiou, S.E. Maier, and B. Madore. Fast diffusion imaging with high angular resolution. Magnetic
resonance in medicine. 2017; 77(2):
696-706.
4. Wu,
W., P.J. Koopmans, J.L. Andersson, and K.L. Miller. Diffusion acceleration with Gaussian process estimated reconstruction
(DAGER). Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2019; 82(1): 107-125.
5. Pruessmann,
K.P., M. Weiger, M.B. Scheidegger, and P. Boesiger. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magnetic resonance in
medicine. 1999; 42(5): 952-962.
6. Griswold,
M.A., P.M. Jakob, R.M. Heidemann, et al. Generalized
autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine: An Official Journal of the International Society for
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2002; 47(6):
1202-1210.
7. Pedersen,
H., S. Kozerke, S. Ringgaard, K. Nehrke, and W.Y. Kim. k‐t PCA: temporally
constrained k‐t BLAST reconstruction
using principal component analysis. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: An
Official Journal of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine. 2009; 62(3): 706-716.
8. Wen, Q., C. Kodiweera, B.M. Dale, G. Shivraman, and Y.C.
Wu. Rotating single‐shot acquisition (RoSA) with
composite reconstruction for fast high‐resolution diffusion imaging. Magnetic resonance in
medicine. 2018; 79(1): 264-275.