Belinda Ding1, Iulius Dragonu2, Patrick Liebig3, Robin M Heidemann3, and Christopher T Rodgers1
1Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre, University of Cambrige, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2Siemens Healthcare Limited, Firmley, United Kingdom, 3Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany
Synopsis
In this study, we showed the novel application of dynamic
pTx pulses for diffusion MRI on a Siemens 7T Terra scanner, with an 8Tx32Rx
Nova head coil. We compared the performance of subject-specific spokes pulses
against traditional circularly polarised pulses in a healthy volunteer. We
observed that pTx pulses improves the signal across the whole brain, especially
in lower brain regions like the cerebellum. This leads to improved definition
of diffusion tracts and higher FA values in the regions of interest. In
conclusion, this work demonstrated the feasibility and benefits of using pTx
pulses for diffusion MRI at 7T.
Introduction
Since its introduction in 1985, diffusion MRI (dMRI) has enabled
the visualisation and characterisation of brain white matter, allowing
scientists and clinicians to study and diagnose diseases including multiple
sclerosis, stroke and dementia1 and to study the brain’s
structural connectivity (“wiring”). One of the main challenges of dMRI is its
intrinsic low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), which can be improved by scanning at
ultra-high field strength2. However, the increased RF transmit
(B1+) non-uniformity at 7T often results in spatially
non-uniform signal magnitude across the brain, including signal dropouts in
lower brain regions3. This is particularly
problematic in dMRI since typical sequences rely on a high flip angle (nominally
180°) refocusing pulse.
In this abstract, we tackle the challenge of B1+ non-uniformity using RF parallel transmission (pTx) by demonstrating the use of
dynamic pTx spokes pulses in dMRI (for the first time to our knowledge) and
comparing performance against dMRI using only pulses played in the Circularly
Polarised (CP+) mode that is equivalent to a traditional single-channel
transmit system.Methods
Data acquisition: One
healthy volunteer (female, age = 28 years old) gave informed consent and was
scanned in a 7T Terra scanner (Siemens) with an 8Tx/32Rx head coil (Nova
Medical). A T1 -weighted whole brain structural image was obtained
with a MP2RAGE sequence at 0.75 mm isotropic resolution. dMRI data were
collected with a single‐shot, spin‐echo, echo planar imaging (EPI) sequence modified
to enable pTx pulses. Diffusion-weighting gradients were applied in 6
directions with a b value of 1000 s/mm2; TE = 60
ms; FOV = 225 × 225 mm2; voxel size = 1.5 × 1.5 × 1.5 mm3;
80 slices with 20% gap covering the entire brain; bandwidth = 1852 Hz/Px;
GRAPPA acceleration factor R=3 and 6/8 partial Fourier. For each
diffusion‐weighted acquisition, one image without diffusion weighting (b = 0)
was also acquired with matching imaging parameters. The entire diffusion
protocol was acquired using CP excitation/refocusing, and then repeated with dynamic
pTx spokes for both excitation and refocusing. In CP mode, all 80 slices were
acquired in one scan, however, due to the conversative SAR limits imposed in pTx
mode, the 80 slices were acquired in 4 groups of 20 slices each. On top of
that, to limit central brightening artifact in CP acquisition, the flip angles
used in both CP and pTx acquisitions were reduced to 80° and 140° for
excitation and refocusing respectively. An additional pair of EPI images were
acquired for distortion correction purposes with matching imaging parameters but
opposite phase encoding directions.
Pulse design: For the pTx acquisition, spokes pulses
were designed separately for excitation and refocusing. B0 field-maps
and per-channel B1+ field-maps were acquired
using the default vendor provided sequences embedded in the pTx framework. The
field-maps were exported and used for offline MATLAB pulse design. For the two superior
imaging slabs, one set of pulses (excitation and refocusing) were designed per
slab. For the two inferior imaging slabs, four sets of pulses (excitation and refocusing)
were designed per slab to combat the greater variation in B1+
in the inferior brain. Thus, a total of 10 sets of pulses (10 excitation pulses
and 10 refocusing pulses) were designed across the 80 slices. i.e. one pair of
pulses for each 20 slices in the superior slabs, and one pair of pulses for
each 5 slices in the inferior half of the imaging volume. Each pulse consists
of 3 spokes with positions determined using the inverse Fourier transform
method. Channel weightings were optimised by a magnitude least square algorithm4. The pulses were then
converted to variable-rate selective excitation (VERSE) pulses5 to reduce both SAR and pulse
duration (Figure
1).
Data analysis: The DTI data were analysed in FSL.
They were first distortion-corrected using ‘topup’6 before measures derived from
the diffusion MR data, including frational anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusitivity (MD), were calculated using ‘dtifit’. For
ROI analysis, the JHU white-matter tractography atlas7 was used and registration
between the MNI 152 common space and the DTI images was performed via the T1
structural image using an affine transformation (using ‘flirt’)8.Results
CP pulses yielded lower signal intensity and signal dropouts
in the brain, especially in the cerebellum, inferior temporal lobes and
brainstem (Figure
2).
Tissue contrasts in these areas are subsequently recovered with pTx pulses. Violin
plots also show increased signal intensities across all ROIs (Figure 3).
The signal dropouts in the CP acquisition translate into
noisy depiction of the FA distribution in these regions (Figure 4).
By contrast, the diffusion tracts in the pTx acquisition are much more defined,
especially in the brainstem. The average FA values are also higher when using
spokes pulses compared to CP pulses across all ROIs (Figure 5).Discussion & Conclusions
The preliminary results from this experiment show the
potential value of dynamic pTx pulses for dMRI. Compared to the standard CP
pulses, pTx pulses increases signal across the whole brain potentially leading
to a better definition of fibre orientations, especially in problematic areas
such as the temporal lobes or cerebellum. This could allow improved
visualisation of white matter architecture in those basal areas with ultra-high
field strength.Acknowledgements
BD is supported by Gates Cambridge Trust. CTR is funded by a Sir Henry
Dale Fellowship from the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society [098436/Z/12/B]. This study was funded by the NIHR Cambridge
Biomedical Research Centre and MRC Clinical Research Infrastructure Award for
7T and has also received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 801075.References
-
Assaf Y, Pasternak O. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-based
white matter mapping in brain research: A review. J Mol Neurosci.
2008;34(1):51-61. doi:10.1007/s12031-007-0029-0
- Wu W, Poser BA, Douaud G, et al. High-resolution diffusion MRI
at 7T using a three-dimensional multi-slab acquisition. Neuroimage.
2016;143:1-14. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.054
- Wu X, Auerbach EJ, Vu AT, et al. High-resolution whole-brain
diffusion MRI at 7T using radiofrequency parallel transmission. Magn Reson
Med. 2018;80(5):1857-1870. doi:10.1002/mrm.27189
- Setsompop K, Wald LL, Alagappan V, Gagoski BA, Adalsteinsson
E. Magnitude least squares optimization for parallel radio frequency excitation
design demonstrated at 7 Tesla with eight channels. Magn Reson Med.
2008;59(4):908-915. doi:10.1002/mrm.21513
- Conolly S, Nishimura D, Macovski A, Glover G. Variable-rate
selective excitation. J Magn Reson. 1988;78(3):440-458.
doi:10.1016/0022-2364(88)90131-X
- Andersson JLR, Skare S, Ashburner J. How to correct
susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: Application to
diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage. 2003;20(2):870-888.
doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00336-7
- Wakana S, Caprihan A, Panzenboeck MM, et al. Reproducibility
of quantitative tractography methods applied to cerebral white matter. Neuroimage.
2007;36(3):630-644. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.049
- Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, Smith S. Improved
Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion
Correction of Brain Images. Neuroimage. 2002;17(2):825-841.
doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1132