Martina Vermathen1, Tobias Emmanuel Kämpfer1,2, and Peter Vermathen2
1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University Bern, Bern, Switzerland, 2Departments of BioMedical Research and Radiology, University Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Synopsis
Porphyrinic photosensitizers (PSs) like chlorin
e4 (Ce4) are applied with polymer-based carriers for photodynamic therapy of
cancer. However, the impact of PSs and their carriers on the metabolic state of
cells in the dark-interval before light treatment are not clear. Here, HR-MAS
NMR metabolomics was applied to cancer cells treated with Ce4 alone or combined
with polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) or block-copolymer micelles (BCMs). A
Ce4-concentration dependent metabolic response was observed that was clearly
attenuated by BCMs and more pronounced by PVP indicating the beneficial role of
the carriers. Direct interaction of Ce4 with glycero-phosphocholine was observed
suggesting intracellular membrane localization.
INTRODUCTION
Porphyrinic photosensitizers (PSs) are used in
photodynamic therapy (PDT) of cancer and non-cancerous diseases due to their
cytotoxic properties that are only unfolded in combination with light and
oxygen.1 Polymer-based nanoparticles (NPs) are mostly used as
delivery systems for PSs since they enhance porphyrin solubility and bioavailability.2
Since both PS and NP are required to exhibit low dark toxicity, to avoid side
effects, and to ensure a light-directed localized therapy, it is important to
assess the in-vivo tolerability of both. Recently, it was shown that the PS chlorin
e4 (Ce4) is well encapsulated into polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) and into block
copolymer micelles (BCMs) formed by Kolliphor P188 (KP).3,4 However,
little is known about the metabolic response of the cells towards the PSs and
NPs.
In this study we investigated how PVP and KP-micelles affect the metabolic
response of cancer cells after incubation with Ce4 in the dark by using High
Resolution Magic Angle Spinning (HR-MAS) NMR.EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Cell culture – Human HeLa cervical cancer cells were cultured in modified DMEM
culture medium. HeLa cells were incubated with culture media containing different
concentrations of Ce4 and carrier (all in triplicates):
(i) Ce4: concentrations of 10μM, 25μM, 62.5μM (3×3 samples)
(ii) Ce4-PVP: Same Ce4 concentrations plus 208.3μM PVP (3×3 samples)
(iii) Ce4-KP: Same Ce4 concentrations plus
3mM KP (3×3 samples)
(iv) only PVP (3 samples)
(v) only KP (3 samples)
(vi) control samples: Pure PBS only (2×3 samples)
resulting in 39 cell samples in total.
Preparation of cell samples – Cells
were harvested and lysed by shock freezing. Frozen samples were stored at -80°C
until measurement, then thawed, heated to inactivate enzymatic activity, and cell suspensions (~4*106cells)
transferred to a 50μL MAS rotor. All preparation steps were performed in the
dark.
NMR Spectroscopy – HR-MAS NMR
was performed on a Bruker AVII 500MHz NMR-spectrometer at 5kHz spinning and 276K. The
following spectra were recorded: (I) T2-edited 1H spectra
using the 1D-PROJECT sequence with water pre-saturation (TE=400ms, 512 scans); (II)
1D-1H diffusion edited spectra (256 scans, 13.5G/cm gradient-strength,
Δ=50ms, δ=6ms). To
support resonance assignments, 2D 1H1H-TOCSY spectra were
acquired on several samples.
Data Analysis - Standard
spectral processing was performed using Topspin™. The 39 PROJECT 1H
HR-MAS NMR spectra were subdivided into 259 individually sized buckets. Multivariate
data analysis was performed applying probabilistic quotient normalization (PQN),
mean centering and pareto scaling. The data were subdivided
into 12 classes according to Ce4 concentration and carrier addition as well as
control samples. PCA was performed to probe for sample clustering. Partial
least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was used to calculate a model for
distinguishing the x-data based on the assignment to 12 classes (y-data).RESULTS
In Fig.1, the structures of Ce4 and the polymeric
carriers PVP and KP are shown.
While both efficiently encapsulate Ce4, BCMs were shown to have enhanced
dynamics leading to faster drug release.4
Unsupervised PCA was
applied to all samples based on their projected 1H-HR-MAS NMR
spectra (Fig.2A). Carrier-free samples shown in blue were well separated from
the remaining ones. Inspection of the isolated subgroups (Fig.2B-D) revealed a
Ce4-concentration dependent trend towards increasing negative PC-scores. KP
samples were more distant from controls than PVP-samples.
Similar results were obtained from oPLS-analysis of
the individual subgroups (Fig.3A-C). For each group (no carrier, KP, PVP), a
Ce4-concentration dependent separation of samples along LV1 was observed with
the highest concentration being most distant from Ce4-free samples. The
corresponding loading plot (Fig.4A,B) revealed strong contributions of
decreased choline, creatine and lactate levels and increased aspartate, citrate
and fumarate levels in separating cells treated with high Ce4 concentration
versus no/low Ce4 levels.
In 1D diffusion edited cell spectra a selective
upfield shift of the GPC
resonance was observed with
increasing Ce4 concentration, while the choline and PC resonances remained
unchanged. The effect was less pronounced in the presence of carriers in the
order no-carrier>KP>PVP (Fig. 5A,B).DISCUSSION
The presence of Ce4 in HeLa cells triggers already in
the dark a concentration dependent response reflected in alterations of
distinct metabolite levels. Due to the strong ring current effect of porphyrins
it was possible to detect the direct intracellular molecular environment of
Ce4, namely the choline containing head groups of GPC. The upfield shift of the
GPC resonance correlated with Ce4 concentration and suggests Ce4 association
with phospholipid membranes. This is in agreement with previous model studies
on Ce6 derivatives with phospholipid vesicles suggesting cellular membranes as
the preferential intracellular localization sites of porphyrinic PSs.5
Both, the metabolic response as well as the GPC
interaction were attenuated when Ce4 was applied in combination with KP and
even more with PVP. This indicates (i) the protective role that the carriers
play upon cell internalization, and (ii) that in agreement with our previous
studies Ce4 seems to be faster released from KP than from PVP.CONCLUSION
The current study underlines the benefitable effect
of carriers following cell internalization. In addition to the known advantages
they attenuate the metabolic response reducing potential toxic effects in the
dark. Micelles promote intracellular redistribution of PSs to membranes whereas
PVP may retain the PSs. The impact on PDT efficiency remains to be evaluated in
further studies including light irradiation.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
-
Abrahamse,
H.; Hamblin, M.-R. New photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. Biochem. J. 2016,
473 (4), 347.
-
Conte,
C.; Maiolino, S.; Pellosi, D. S.; Miro, A.; Ungaro, F.; Quaglia, F., Polymeric
Nanoparticles for Cancer Photodynamic Therapy. In Light-Responsive
Nanostructured Systems for Applications in Nanomedicine, Sortino, S., Ed.
Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2016; pp 61-112.
-
Gjuroski,
I.; Furrer, J.; Vermathen, M., How Does the Encapsulation of Porphyrinic
Photosensitizers into Polymer Matrices Affect Their Self-Association and
Dynamic Properties? ChemPhysChem 2018, 19 (9), 1089-1102.
-
Gjuroski,
I.; Girousi, E.; Meyer, C.;
Hertig, D.; Stojkov, D.; Fux, M.;
Schnidrig, N.; Bucher, J.; Pfister, S.;
Sauser, L.; Simon, H.-U.; Vermathen, P.; Furrer, J.; Vermathen, M., Evaluation of
polyvinylpyrrolidone and block copolymer micelle encapsulation of serine
chlorin e6 and chlorin e4 on their reactivity towards albumin and transferrin
and their cell uptake. Journal of Controlled Release 2019, 316, 150-167.
- Vermathen,
M., Marzorati, M., Vermathen, P., Bigler, P. pH-Dependent Distribution of
Chlorin e6 Derivatives across Phospholipid Bilayers Probed by NMR Spectroscopy.
Langmuir 2010, 26, 13, 11085–1109