Lin Chen1,2 and Jiadi Xu1,2
1Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States, 2F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Research Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States
Synopsis
We compared the sensitivity of several chemical
exchange saturation transfer (CEST) contrasts in detecting altered pH at 11.7 T
MRI. Studies with egg white phantom
revealed that amide and guanidium CEST contrasts in protein are suitable for pH
mapping at the physiological relevant range (6.5-7.5), while amineCEST works
well for pH lower than 6.5. Hypercapnia (20%) study in mouse brain indicated that creatineCEST showed
both higher pH sensitivity and signal intensity compared with amide and guanidium CEST at the physiological pH range and
is more suitable for in vivo pH studies at high field.
Purpose
One of
the most important applications of CEST MRI is pH mapping, which has already shown
great success in many disease diagnoses such as stroke (1), tumor(2), and renal pH
homeostasis (3). Up to now,
there are many CEST contrasts were discovered for pH mapping at high MRI fields
such as amide (3.5 ppm) (1), amine (2.7 ppm)
(4), guanidinium (2
ppm) (5), and creatine (2
ppm) (6) CEST. However,
there are few comparisons in terms of pH sensitivity among those contrasts. In the
current study, we used hypercapnia to alternating the pH in the brain
cells (7-10) together
with egg white phantom to determine which CEST
contrast is suitable for detecting the pH response at the physiological pH range.Methods
Egg white is an ideal
model to demonstrate the sensitivity of the amide, guanidinium, and amine CEST from
mobile proteins for detecting pH
variation by titrating to pH 6, 6.5, 7, and 7.5. Hypercapnia was used to evaluate the
sensitivity of CEST contrast in detecting pH change in brain. Z-spectra on five wild
type mouse brains pre- and post-20% CO2
inhalation were
recorded. The 20% CO2 delivery was accomplished by mixing the air and CO2 with flow rates of 2 and 0.5
L/min, respectively. CEST experiments were
performed using continuous-wave CEST (cwCEST). MR images were acquired using a
Turbo Spin Echo (TSE) sequence with TE = 18 ms, TR=5 s, TSE factor
= 20, slice thickness =1.5 mm and a matrix size of 64×64. All MRI experiments were performed on a horizontal bore
11.7 T Bruker Biospec system. The saturation field strength (B1) and length were 2 μT and 1 s for creatine CEST (CrCEST), 0.5 μT and 3 s for guanidinium CEST
(guanCEST), and 1 μT and 2 s for amideCEST according to previous optimization results (11-13). The extraction
of the CEST signal was achieved using polynomial and Lorentzian line-shape fitting (PLOF) as detailed
previously (11,12,14-16).
31P MRS
was performed to measure the cerebral pH and phosphocreatine changes after CO2
inhalation. The intracellular pH was calculated from
the chemical shift of the Pi peak relative to the PCr peak. The in vivo 31P
MRS experiments were performed using a single pulse sequence (TR = 2 s, NA =
512, bandwidth = 50 ppm, acquisition time = 100 ms). The total experimental
time was 16 minutes. Results and Discussion
The Z-spectra of egg
white phantoms with different pH values are plotted in Fig. 2. The amide peak
at 3.5 ppm disappears at pH 6.5 (17). The
guanidinium peak increases when pH drops from 7.5 to 6.5. However, the peak
will begin to decrease when pH further drops to 6. The amine peak is not
visible when pH is higher than 6.5 and will form a single peak centered at 2.7
ppm when the pH is less than 6.5. Interestingly, there still a strong broad
signal between 0 to 5 ppm that is not sensitive to pH and is still visible even
at pH 6, which is assigned as amideNOE. The amideNOE may be attributable to
non-exchanging amide protons or amide proton with extremely slow exchange
rates, but they will still be able to transfer magnetization to water following
a two-step relayed NOE process with faster exchanging neighboring protons (18). To
validate the feasibility of different CEST contrasts (amideCEST, CrCEST and
GuanCEST) in detecting subtle cerebral pH changes, Z-spectra were recorded of mouse
brain before and after 20% CO2 inhalation (Fig. 2). The results reveal
that CrCEST (4.26±0.32%) yields a much stronger signal compared to both
amideCEST (1.97±0.39%,) and guanCEST (1.46±0.30%).
Both CrCEST and amideCEST
exhibited reduced CEST contrast after CO2 inhalation, while guanCEST increases slightly. A significant difference was observed in the
change in CrCEST signal intensity (0.90±0.4%, p
< 0.001), while a much smaller difference was observed in the amideCEST results (0.59±0.39%, p = 0.061) as well as the guanCEST (-0.07±0.05%, p = 0.74). This observation also confirmed the previous
assignment that the CEST peak at 2 ppm is dominated by guanCEST with low saturation
powers (<0.6 mT) and is mainly from CrCEST with high powers
(11,12).
A cerebral pH change from 7.26±0.07 to 6.99 ±0.07 was measured with 31P MRS. The PCr peak broadened and also the concentration decreased by approximately
9.6±5%, as determined from the integral (2.18 ±1.1
104 to 1.97 ±1.0
104),
which is caused by the conversion of PCr to Cr as pH decreases (19,20).
The pH detection sensitivity of CEST MRI is proportional to the change in
the exchange rate induced by pH variations. Compared to amide protons, Cr protons possess
a much higher exchange rate more than 1000 Hz (21), and
hence, a larger exchange rate change related to pH variations. Conclusion
We demonstrated that
CrCEST is a highly pH-sensitive method at high fieldAcknowledgements
This work was supported by NIH: R01HL149742, R03NS109664, R21NS118079, R21AG065794 and DOD W81XWH-18-1-0797References
1. Zhou
J, Payen JF, Wilson DA, Traystman RJ, van Zijl PC. Using the amide proton
signals of intracellular proteins and peptides to detect pH effects in MRI. Nat
Med 2003;9(8):1085-1090.
2. Chen
LQ, Pagel MD. Evaluating pH in the Extracellular Tumor Microenvironment Using
CEST MRI and Other Imaging Methods. Adv Radiol 2015;2015(2015):pii: 206405.
3. Longo
DL, Busato A, Lanzardo S, Antico F, Aime S. Imaging the pH evolution of an
acute kidney injury model by means of iopamidol, a MRI-CEST pH-responsive
contrast agent. Magn Reson Med 2013;70(3):859-864.
4. Jin
T, Wang P, Zong X, Kim S-G. Magnetic resonance imaging of the Amine–Proton
EXchange (APEX) dependent contrast. NeuroImage 2012;59(2):1218-1227.
5. Jin
T, Wang P, Hitchens TK, Kim SG. Enhancing sensitivity of pH-weighted MRI with
combination of amide and guanidyl CEST. NeuroImage 2017;157:341-350.
6. Haris
M, Nanga RP, Singh A, Cai K, Kogan F, Hariharan H, Reddy R. Exchange rates of
creatine kinase metabolites: feasibility of imaging creatine by chemical
exchange saturation transfer MRI. NMR Biomed 2012;25(11):1305-1309.
7. Boron
WF. Regulation of intracellular pH. Advances in Physiology Education
2004;28(4):160-179.
8. Chesler
M. Regulation and modulation of pH in the brain. Physiol Rev
2003;83(4):1183-1221.
9. Boron
WF, De Weer P. Intracellular pH transients in squid giant axons caused by CO2,
NH3, and metabolic inhibitors. J Gen Physiol 1976;67(1):91-112.
10. Thomas
RC. Intracellular pH of snail neurones measured with a new pH-sensitive glass
mirco-electrode. J Physiol 1974;238(1):159-180.
11. Chen
L, Wei Z, Cai S, Li Y, Liu G, Lu H, Weiss RG, van Zijl PCM, Xu J. High-resolution
creatine mapping of mouse brain at 11.7 T using non-steady-state chemical
exchange saturation transfer. NMR Biomed 2019;32(11):e4168.
12. Chen
L, Zeng H, Xu X, Yadav NN, Cai S, Puts NA, Barker PB, Li T, Weiss RG, van Zijl
PCM, Xu J. Investigation of the contribution of total creatine to the CEST
Z-spectrum of brain using a knockout mouse model. NMR Biomed 2017;30(12):e3834.
13. Jin
T, Wang P, Zong X, Kim S-G. MR imaging of the amide-proton transfer effect and
the pH-insensitive nuclear overhauser effect at 9.4 T. Magn Reson Med
2013;69(3):760-770.
14. Chen
L, Barker PB, Weiss RG, van Zijl PCM, Xu J. Creatine and phosphocreatine
mapping of mouse skeletal muscle by a polynomial and Lorentzian line-shape
fitting CEST method. Magn Reson Med 2019;81(1):69-78.
15. Chen
L, Schar M, Chan KWY, Huang J, Wei Z, Lu H, Qin Q, Weiss RG, van Zijl PCM, Xu
J. In vivo imaging of phosphocreatine with artificial neural networks. Nat
Commun 2020;11(1):1072.
16. Chen
L, Cao S, Koehler RC, van Zijl PCM, Xu J. High-sensitivity CEST mapping using a
spatiotemporal correlation-enhanced method. Magn Reson Med
2020:10.1002/mrm.28380.
17. Zhou
IY, Lu D, Ji Y, Wu L, Wang E, Cheung JS, Zhang XA, Sun PZ. Determination of
multipool contributions to endogenous amide proton transfer effects in global
ischemia with high spectral resolution in vivo chemical exchange saturation
transfer MRI. Magn Reson Med 2018.
18. Xu
J, Yadav NN, Bar-Shir A, Jones CK, Chan KW, Zhang J, Walczak P, McMahon MT, van
Zijl PC. Variable delay multi-pulse train for fast chemical exchange saturation
transfer and relayed-nuclear overhauser enhancement MRI. Magn Reson Med
2014;71(5):1798-1812.
19. Nishimura
M, Johnson DC, Hitzig BM, Okunieff P, Kazemi H. Effects of hypercapnia on brain
pHi and phosphate metabolite regulation by 31P-NMR. J Appl Physiol (1985)
1989;66(5):2181-2188.
20. Litt
L, Gonzalez-Mendez R, Severinghaus JW, Hamilton WK, Shuleshko J, Murphy-Boesch
J, James TL. Cerebral intracellular changes during supercarbia: an in vivo 31P
nuclear magnetic resonance study in rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab
1985;5(4):537-544.
21. Goerke
S, Zaiss M, Bachert P. Characterization of creatine guanidinium proton exchange
by water-exchange (WEX) spectroscopy for absolute-pH CEST imaging in vitro. NMR
Biomed 2014;27(5):507-518.