1180

Improved Sampling for Distortionless Diffusion Weighted 2D Cartesian Multi-Shot Fast Spin Echo
Philip Kenneth Lee1,2, Yuxin Hu1,2, Catherine Judith Moran2, Bruce Lewis Daniel2, and Brian Andrew Hargreaves1,2,3
1Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States, 2Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States, 3Biomedical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States

Synopsis

In diffusion weighted imaging, multi-shot Echo Planar Imaging (EPI) is preferred over single-shot EPI due to reduced geometric distortion. Recent work has shown that low-rank reconstructions can correct ghosts from shot-to-shot phase without explicitly acquiring a phase navigator. These works have been limited to EPI sampling trajectories with uniform ky sampling. 2D Cartesian Fast Spin Echo (FSE) is a distortionless alternative to multi-shot EPI that has greater freedom in k-space traversal and reduced chemical shift artifacts. Using FSE, we demonstrate in simulation and in vivo that an intelligent choice of sampling pattern greatly enhances image quality in multi-shot diffusion imaging.

Introduction

Multi-shot Echo Planar Imaging (EPI) is often applied to reduce off-resonance induced geometric distortion in diffusion weighted (DW) imaging. Ghosts from shot-to-shot phase caused by motion sensitizing diffusion gradients can be resolved with phase correction prior to shot combination1,2, or without explicit phase estimation using low-rank regularizers in k-space3 or image domain4. The application of low-rank regularizers for reconstructing multi-shot DW data has been limited to 2D EPI data, which must be uniformly sampled to maintain constant ky velocity.

In this work, we show that the correct choice of Cartesian sampling trajectory can greatly enhance image quality in an image domain locally low-rank reconstruction4,5. Data is acquired with a distortionless, diffusion prepped, multi-shot 2D Fast Spin Echo (FSE) sequence. Multi-shot FSE permits modification of sampling patterns in ky-shot space and reduces T2 blurring effects compared to single-shot FSE.

First, we tested a random sampling pattern that creates incoherent aliasing in y-shot space. Compressed sensing reconstructions exploiting sparsity in certain dimensions are known to benefit from noise-like aliasing6. We then tested a trajectory that incorporates the center two k-space lines at the beginning of each randomly sampled shot. This was inspired by calibrationless imaging work, which show improved reconstruction quality with the addition of a few center lines7,8. Prospective reconstructions were compared to shot combination using phase navigators acquired at the end of each echo train. Sampling patterns are shown in Figure 1. We also compared to FSE-PROPELLER, which achieves distortionless DW images using a hybrid radial-Cartesian trajectory at the cost of 1.5x more excitations to fully cover k-space.

Methods

Cartesian DW data was acquired using a diffusion prepared, twice refocused M1 nulled 2D FSE sequence shown in Figure 2a. Non-CPMG magnetization caused by random phase from diffusion gradients was eliminated using a stimulated echo preparation9.

Simulated and prospective multi-shot data were reconstructed using Shot Locally Low Rank (SLLR), which frames the shot combination as a calibrationless reconstruction. Shot images are treated as coil images, and varying phase between shots is analogous to unknown coil sensitivities4,5. SLLR minimizes Equation (1), where $$$D_i$$$, $$$x_i$$$, and $$$y_i$$$ are respectively the sampling operator, shot image to reconstruct, and acquired multi-channel data of the $$$i$$$th shot; $$$F$$$ is the Fourier transform; $$$S$$$ is the sensitivity map; $$$\lambda$$$ is the regularization parameter; and $$$\Omega$$$ Is the set of nonoverlapping blocks. The $$$R_b$$$ operator collects a local patch of coil-combined shot images to form a spatial-shot matrix, shown in Figure 2b.

$$\min_{x_{1\cdots N_{shots}}}\sum_{i=1}^{N_{shots}}\parallel{D_iFSx_i-y_i}\parallel^2_2+\lambda\sum_{k\in\Omega}\parallel{R_b(x_{1\cdots N_{shots}})}\parallel_*\qquad\qquad(1)$$

Uniform, random, and center-oversampled patterns were tested in simulation using a T2-weighted breast image, matrix 128$$$\times$$$128, $$$N_{shots}$$$ 12. Shot-to-shot phase maps from phase navigators acquired during DW imaging of the subject were applied to simulate motion-induced phase variations.

Sampling patterns were applied prospectively in the pelvis of two female volunteers with informed consent and IRB approval. Acquisition parameters were: matrix 128$$$\times$$$128, 38 cm FOV, 8 shots, ETL 16 + (4 for navigator, 2 if center oversampled), slice thickness 5 mm, b-value 500 s/mm2, TR 8000 ms, ESP 6 ms, preparation TE 50 ms, refocusing flip angle 120°, readout BW ±50 kHz, 3T (GE Signa Premier). DW FSE-PROPELLER with identical matrix size and matching scan time was collected for comparison. A higher resolution 12-shot scan with matrix 192$$$\times$$$192 was also performed.

Coil sensitives were estimated with ESPIRIT10 from b0 images. The $$$\lambda$$$ that provided the best reconstruction quality without block-like artifacts was $$$\lambda=0.001$$$ for uniform density, and $$$\lambda=0.01$$$ for center oversampled data with a 5$$$\times$$$5 window.

Results

Simulated SLLR reconstructions in high SNR data are shown in Figure 3. Uniformly and randomly sampled data do not recover all details and have altered contrast. SLLR reconstruction in center oversampled data corrects these artifacts and matches the reference.

Figure 4 compares a uniformly sampled 8-shot SLLR reconstruction with a time matched DW FSE-PROPELLER. SLLR has improved detail compared to FSE-PROPELLER, which has noticeable streaking. SLLR reconstruction has improved ghost reduction compared to the navigator combination, which has residual ghosts from subcutaneous fat.

Figure 5 compares different sampling patterns in a 12-shot acquisition. Uniform sampling has loss of structure in low SNR regions, which is partially corrected with random sampling and further improved with center oversampling. Uniform and random sampling have reduced organ contrast, which is corrected with center oversampling.

Discussion

We have shown that FSE sampling patterns can be modified to complement low-rank reconstructions. Random ky sampling improves detail in low SNR areas, and center oversampling preserves contrast in acquisitions with a high number of shots, which are required to mitigate T2 blurring effects prominent in single-shot FSE. This may be due to uniform sampling missing the contrast-rich k-space center when the number of shots is high. Although the acquisition time of DW FSE is 1.5-2$$$\times$$$ longer than EPI due to gradient heating, FSE eliminates distortion in the phase encode direction. This can be applied to off-resonance environments where multi-shot EPI would fail, such as DW imaging near metallic breast biopsy clips, hip prostheses, and gas filled bowel loops.

Conclusion

Sampling patterns in Cartesian DW FSE can be modified to improve low-rank reconstructions. Cartesian DW FSE is more time efficient than FSE-PROPELLER and has less geometric distortion than EPI.

Acknowledgements

R01 EB009055. GE Healthcare. Karolinska Neuro MR Physics group for pulse programming assistance.

References

1. N Chen et al. A robust multi-shot scan strategy for high-resolution diffusion weighted MRI enabled by multiplexed sensitivity-encoding (MUSE). Neuroimage. 2013;72:41-47.

2. Z Zhang et al. Multishot cartesian turbo spin-echo diffusion imaging using iterative POCSMUSE Reconstruction. JMRI. 2017;6(1):167-174.

3. M Mani et al. Multi-shot sensitivity-encoded diffusion data recovery using structured low-rank matrix completion (MUSSELS). MRM. 2016;78(2):494-507.

4. Y Hu et al. Motion-robust reconstruction of multishot diffusion-weighted images without phase estimation through locally low-rank regularization. MRM. 2019;81(2):1181-1190.

5. JD Trzasko et al. Calibrationless parallel MRI using CLEAR. IEEE ASILOMAR. 2011. pp. 75-79.

6. M Lustig et al. Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. MRM. 2007;58:1182-1195.

7. JP Haldar et al. P-LORAKS: Low-rank modeling of local k-space neighborhoods with parallel imaging data. MRM. 2016;75(4):1499-1514.

8. PJ Shin et al. Calibrationless parallel imaging reconstruction based on structured low-rank matrix completion. MRM. 2014;72(4):959-970.

9. Q Zhang et al. Diffusion-prepared stimulated-echo turbo spin echo (DPsti-TSE). NMR in Biomedicine. 2017;30(7).

10. M Uecker et al. ESPIRiT—an eigenvalue approach to autocalibrating parallel MRI: where SENSE meets GRAPPA. MRM. 2014;71(3):990-1001.


Figures

Figure 1: Random sampling patterns were generated by dividing k-space into $$$ETL$$$ segments, represented by different colours. Each sample is randomly assigned to a shot. K-space is fully covered when shots are combined. For center oversampling, the center two ky lines were added to the beginning of a randomly generated shot. A low-resolution phase navigator was explicitly acquired with uniformly sampled data because the shot undersampling factor is too high for parallel imaging to recover phase maps.

Figure 2: Top: Diffusion prepped FSE provides additional freedom in k-space traversal due to the refocusing pulses. Non-CPMG artifacts are prevented by measuring the magnetization at the end of the preparation through a stimulated echo pathway. Bottom: The $$$R_b$$$ operator collects voxels in a small window of coil combined images to form a local spatial-shot matrix. This operator is applied to all non-overlapping blocks in the image. Assuming smooth image phase, these local matrices exhibit low rankedness which is enforced with the nuclear norm.

Figure 3: SLLR reconstruction in T2-weighted images with simulated shot-to-shot phase. (A) Reference image. (B) Naive combination shows ghosts from simulated 12-shot acquisition (red arrow). (C) Sample phase maps. (D) SLLR reconstruction with uniformly sampled data does not recover all details (yellow) and affects contrast (green). (E) Random sampling marginally improves contrast in left breast (green). (F) Center oversampling recovers details matching the reference (yellow) and corrects contrast in the left breast.

Figure 4: (A) DW FSE-PROPELLER of female pelvis has visible streaking (green arrows) and details in organs are obscured. Cartesian sampling improves depiction of the endometrium (red). (B) Time matched 8-shot Cartesian DW-FSE with identical resolution has apparent multi-shot ghosts. (C) Navigator correction before shot combination has residual ghosting (yellow, orange). (D) SLLR corrects residual ghosting (yellow, orange), and has improved resolution without streaking when compared to FSE-PROPELLER (green).

Figure 5: (A) T2-weighted b0 image. (B) Naive combination of 12-shot data has severe multi-shot ghosting resulting in signal dropout. (C) Navigator shot combination has some residual ghosting (green). (D) SLLR reconstruction of uniformly sampled b500 data has loss of detail (yellow, orange), and reduced organ contrast (red). (E) Random sampling improves detail (yellow, orange). (F) Center oversampling further enhances detail (yellow, orange), restores organ contrast, matching the navigator combination (red), and improves SNR (white).

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 29 (2021)
1180