Yilong Liu1,2, Kun Zhou3, Dehe Weng3, Hua Guo4, and Ed X. Wu1,2
1Laboratory of Biomedical Imaging and Signal Processing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, 2Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, 3Siemens Shenzhen Magnetic Resonance Ltd, Shenzhen, China, 4Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Synopsis
This study presents a calibrationless parallel imaging
(CPI) reconstruction for simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) PROPELLER MRI of the
upper abdomen. With simultaneously excited slices having different blipped-CAIPI
shifts, the inherent incoherency of SMS PROPELLER data enables CPI
reconstruction via low rank matrix approximation. The proposed method was
evaluated with both simulated phantom and acquired abdominal MR data. Compared to
conventional split slice-GRAPPA, the proposed method jointly reconstructs all
blades, providing significantly improved SNR and reduced artifact level.
Introduction
PROPELLER
MRI has shown its effectiveness and efficiency for motion compensation in
abdominal imaging1,2, but it prolongs the scan time
compared to Cartesian acquisition. In practice, PROPELLER MRI can be accelerated
using parallel imaging with in-plane undersampling and/or simultaneous
multi-slice (SMS) acquisition. Conventionally, each blade can be recovered with
parallel imaging reconstruction, then combined to form an image3,4.
However, reconstructing individual blades separately can cause severe
noise amplification, especially at high undersampling factors. Moreover, calibration-based
methods rely on additionally acquired calibration data, which further prolongs
the acquisition time, and can be sensitive to the mismatch between the
calibration and PROPELLER data.
Besides
motion compensation capability, PROPELLER MRI samples the k-space in an
incoherent way. Specifically, undersampled blades with different rotation
angles spread the aliasing along different directions. In SMS PROPELLER, with
simultaneously excited/acquired slices having different blipped-CAIPI shifts,
each slice has distinct aliasing spreading patterns, leading to incoherency
along slice direction. Such characteristics can enable calibrationless parallel
imaging reconstruction and exploitation of coil sensitivity encoding
capabilities in both in-plane and slice directions.
In
this study, a calibrationless parallel imaging (CPI) reconstruction method was
proposed for SMS PROPELLER. It jointly reconstructs all blades, with parallel
imaging constraint for each slice promoted via low-rank matrix approximation5,6, and data consistency enforced by minimizing
the difference between synthesized and acquired SMS PROPELLER data. The
proposed approach was evaluated with both simulation and in vivo studies.Method
Proposed Reconstruction
The
proposed method simultaneously performs parallel imaging reconstruction and
blade combination, it iteratively updates the estimated k-space by sequentially
promoting structural low-rankness and enforcing data consistency (Figure 1). Specifically, structural
low-rankness is promoted for individual slices by constructing a block-wise
Hankel matrix, performing singular value decomposition, forcing low-rankness
through rank truncation, and structural consistency by averaging the elements
corresponding to the same k-space sample5,6. The data consistency is enforced
for individual blades by resampling the PROPELLER data for each slice,
synthesizing readout concatenated SMS blade data7, calculating the difference with
acquired data, estimating the updates for each slice on PROPELLER trajectories,
and regridding the updates onto Cartesian grids using inverse NUFFT.
Evaluation with Simulations Study
Phantom data were acquired on a Siemens 1.5T MAGNETOM Aera scanner equipped with a 20-channel head coil, using spin echo sequence with TR/TE=550/9ms, matrix size=320×256, FOV=230×230mm2. The acquired k-space data were retrospectively resampled following a PROPELLER trajectory with number of samples along readout=240, blade width=32, blade number=12, and used to synthesize SMS PROPELLER data at MB=3/R=1, and MB=3/R=2, where MB denotes multiband factor and R denotes in-plane acceleration factor. 3 selected slices were simulated to be simultaneously excited/acquired with blipped-CAIPI shift set to i/(MB×R) FOV (i=0,1,2). The proposed method was performed with kernel size=6×6, normalized target rank=1.81. The iteration process stopped when the update of k-space data estimation was lower than 0.1‰. The proposed method was compared to conventional split slice-GRAPPA (SPSG) reconstruction, which reconstructed each blade independently and combined all blades after phase correction. SPSG was performed with the first blade as calibration data, kernel size=5×5, regularization factor=0.0001.
Evaluation with In Vivo Study
Human
abdominal MR data were acquired with a prototype SMS PROPELLER sequence8 on a Siemens 1.5T MAGNETOM Aera
scanner using 18-channel body and 24-channel spine coils, with 30 channels adaptively
selected. At MB=2/R=2, data were acquired with TR/TE=2000/107ms, echo train
length (ETL)=36, blade number=10. At MB=3/R=2, data were acquired with
TR/TE=2000/110ms, ETL=30, blade number=12. Other parameters were FOV=380×380mm2,
slice thickness/gap=6/1mm, slice number=24, matrix size=320×320, refocusing
flip angle=150°. Blipped-CAIPI shift was set to i/(MB×R) FOV (i=0,1,…,MB-1). Calibration data for SPSG was acquired using GRE with matrix
size=64×32. The data were acquired using navigator-triggered prospective
acquisition correction (PACE) for respiratory motion compensation, and SPAIR
(SPectral Attenuated Inversion Recovery) for fat suppression. The proposed reconstruction
was performed with kernel size=6×6, normalized target rank=1.17, the iteration
process stopped when the update was lower than 1‰.Results
Figure 2 displays the images reconstructed
from simulated SMS PROPELLER data at MB=3/R=1, and MB=3/R=2. The SPSG results
suffered from severe noise amplification, especially at MB=3/R=2. With CPI
reconstruction, the residual error was significantly lower compared with SPSG (Figure 3). Both CPI and SPSG were
quantitatively evaluated using root mean square errors (RMSE). CPI had
substantially reduced residual error, with ~70% and ~50% reduction of RMSE compared
to SPSG at MB=3/R=1, and MB=3/R=2, respectively. Figure 4 shows representative slices for in vivo results at MB=2/R=2, where CPI provided improved results
over SPSG in terms of SNR and residual artifacts. Figure 5 shows the images from the same slice locations at MB=3/R=2.
At higher multiband factor, such improvement became even more significant.Discussion
The
incoherency of SMS PROPELER data can enable robust CPI reconstruction. The
proposed CPI reconstruction jointly reconstructs all blades, thus substantially
improves the SNR. Note that, with free-breathing, respiratory motion induced
corruption of calibration data, and/or dramatic mismatch between calibration
and PROPELLER data can undermine the performance of calibration-based parallel
imaging reconstruction. Future studies will evaluate the robustness of the
proposed CPI reconstruction over conventional SPSG reconstruction in such
scenario.Conclusions
The
proposed CPI can provide robust reconstruction for SMS PROPELLER of upper
abdomen, outperforms conventional SPSG reconstruction in terms of improved SNR and
reduced residual artifacts. Acknowledgements
This
study was supported by Hong Kong Research Grant Council (R7003-19, C7048-16G,
HKU17112120, HKU17103819 and HKU17104020), Guangdong Key Technologies for
Treatment of Brain Disorders (2018B030332001), and Guangdong Key Technologies
for Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (2018B030336001).References
[1] Pipe
JG. Motion correction with PROPELLER MRI: application to head motion and
free-breathing cardiac imaging. Magn Reson Med 1999;42(5):963-969.
[2] Hirokawa Y, Isoda H, Maetani YS et al. MRI Artifact Reduction and
Quality Improvement in the Upper Abdomen with PROPELLER and Prospective
Acquisition Correction (PACE) Technique. American Journal of Roentgenology
2008;191(4):1154-1158.
[3] Norbeck O, Avventi E, Engstrom M, Ryden
H, Skare S. Simultaneous multi-slice combined with PROPELLER. Magn Reson Med
2018;80(2):496-506.
[4] Chang Y, Pipe JG, Karis JP et al. The effects of SENSE on
PROPELLER imaging. Magn Reson Med 2015;74(6):1598-1608.
[5] Shin PJ, Larson PE, Ohliger MA et al. Calibrationless parallel imaging
reconstruction based on structured low-rank matrix completion. Magn Reson Med
2014;72(4):959-970.
[6] Liu Y, Yi Z, Zhao Y et al. Calibrationless Parallel Imaging
Reconstruction for Multislice MR Data using Low-Rank Tensor Completion. Magn
Reson Med 2020;85(2):897-911.
[7] Koopmans PJ.
Two-dimensional-NGC-SENSE-GRAPPA for fast, ghosting-robust reconstruction of
in-plane and slice-accelerated blipped-CAIPI echo planar imaging. Magn Reson
Med 2017;77(3):998-1009.
[8] Zhou K, Liu W, Dong F, Cheng S.
Slice-GRAPPA calibration using pre-scan data and application to simultaneous
multi-slice PROPELLER. In: 2017 Proceedings of International Society for
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM), Honolulu, 2017, p 3842.