Ting-ting Lin1 and Jiang-ning Dong2
1Radiology Department, Anhui Provincial Cancer Hospital, Hefei, China, 2Radiology department, Anhui Provincial Cancer Hospital, Hefei, China
Synopsis
The aim of our study was to investigate the early predictive value of IVIM-DWI
in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. 43 cases of breast cancer confirmed by pathological
puncture biopsy in our hospital were enrolled in this study. Four courses of neoadjuvant
chemotherapy were used to evaluate the efficacy. The conclusion obtained via the present study is IVIM-DWI can predict the early curative effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for
breast cancer and evaluate its effectiveness. It can assist conventional MRI to
evaluate the curative effect.
Objective
To
investigate the early predictive value of IVIM-DWI in neoadjuvant chemotherapy
for breast cancer.Methods
43
cases of breast cancer confirmed by pathological puncture biopsy in our
hospital were collected. Four courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were used to
evaluate the efficacy. IVIM-DWI was performed after each chemotherapy. IVIM-DWI
parameters included standard apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), slow
apparent diffusion coefficient (D), fast apparent diffusion coefficient (D*)
and perfusion fraction (f). Referring to RECIST criteria, the study cases were
divided into two groups: (1) effective group: complete remission (CR) and
partial remission (PR); (2) ineffective group: progress disease (PD) and stable
disease (SD). Multivariate analysis of variance was used to compare IVIM-DWI
parameters before and after treatment, between effective and ineffective
groups. The ROC curve was used to calculate the optimal diagnostic threshold
for the effective group and the ineffective group.Results
A
total of 49 lesions were studied, including 33 in the effective group (CR: 7,
PR: 26) and 16 in the ineffective group (SD: 11, PD: 5). There was significant
difference in the volume of tumors in the effective group of pretherapy and the
third treatment course, but there was no significant difference in the
ineffective group. There were significant differences in D value, D* value and
F value of IVIM-DWI parameters among three groups of pretherapy, 1st
treatment and 3rd treatment in the effective group (F value was
30.487, 6.752 and 8.983, respectively, P < 0.05), but there was no
significant difference in ADC value (P > 0.05). There was no significant
difference in parameters in the three groups before and after treatment in the
ineffective group. There were significant differences in D value, D* value and
F value of IVIM-DWI parameters between effective group and ineffective group
before treatment (F value was 30.487, 6.752 and 8.983 respectively, P <
0.05), but there was no significant difference in ADC value (P > 0.05). The
area under curve (AUC) of D value, D* value and F value were 0.889, 0.910 and
0.879 respectively. The diagnostic thresholds were 0.716 mm2/s (specificity and
sensitivity were 75.1% and 95.2%, respectively), 37.85 mm2/s (specificity and
sensitivity were 71.2% and 98.3%, respectively) and 0.292 (specificity and
sensitivity were 89.4% and 81.5%, respectively). (Table 1, Figure 1-2)Conclusion
IVIM-DWI
can predict the early curative effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast
cancer and evaluate its effectiveness. It can assist conventional MRI to
evaluate the curative effect.Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge Dr Xing-xiang Li for his help in analyzing the date of samples.References
1. Liu C, Liang C, Liu Z, et
al. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions:
comparison with conventional DWI.[J]. European Journal of Radiology, 2013, 82(12):e782-e789.
2. Lee Y J, Kim S H, Kang B J,
et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)‐derived parameters in diffusion‐weighted MRI: Associations with prognostic factors in invasive
ductal carcinoma[J]. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2017, 45(5).
3. Liu C, Wang K, Chan Q, et
al. Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for breast lesions: comparison and
correlation with pharmacokinetic evaluation from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR
imaging[J]. European Radiology, 2016, 26(11):1-11.
4. Bokacheva L, Kaplan J B,
Giri D D, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 T
differentiates malignant breast lesions from benign lesions and breast
parenchyma.[J]. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Jmri, 2015,
40(4):813-823.
5. Kim Y, Kim S H, Lee H W, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion
diffusion-weighted MRI for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in
breast cancer[J]. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2018, 48:27-33.
6. Rahbar H, Partridge S C. Multiparametric Breast MRI of Breast
Cancer[J]. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America, 2016,
24(1):223.