Kiran Thapaliya1,2, Donald Staines1, Sonya Marshall-Gradisnik1, and Leighton Barnden1
1Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia, 2Centre for Advanced Imaging, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Synopsis
Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME)/Chronic
fatigue syndrome (CFS) patients suffer from a variety of physical and
neurological complaints indicating the central nervous system plays a role in ME/CFS
pathophysiology. Structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging have been
used to identify the pathomechanism of ME/CFS However, changes in tissue
microstructure to understand the pathomechanism of ME/CFS using diffusion
tensor imaging (DTI) have not been fully investigated. Our DTI study showed
abnormality of the brain stem in ME/CFS patients relative to healthy controls.
Introduction
Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) also known as Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)
(ME/CFS) is a complex illness characterised by profound fatigue for more than 6
months that impairs cognitive and motor dysfunction, and unrefreshing sleep1. Patients who suffer from ME/CFS report
a variety of physical complaints as well as neurological symptoms like cognitive
impairment, loss of memory, and concentration.
Structural2,3 and functional4 magnetic resonance imaging was used to seek
a biomarker of the underlying causes of ME/CFS. However, findings are
inconsistent across these studies5,6. Recently, diffusion tensor imaging
(DTI) has been used to study tissue microstructural changes in
neurodegenerative diseases7.
DTI is a technique
that provides information on the cellular structure by measuring the random
motion of water molecules8. DTI metrics have been used to study white
matter integrity, axonal damage, and myelin loss in neurodegenerative diseases7. However, only two studies have used DTI
techniques especially fractional anisotropy (FA) to study microstructural
changes in ME/CFS patients9,10. The first study9 showed increased FA values in right arcuate
fasciculus whereas the second study10 showed a significant decrease of FA values in
the genu of the corpus callosum and internal capsule of ME/CFS patients. These
inconsistent findings in ME/CFS motivate further investigation with additional
DTI metrics such as eigenvalues (λ1, λ2, λ3), FA, mean diffusivity (MD), and radial
diffusivity (RD). In this study, we investigated tissue microstructural changes
in ME/CFS patients to better understand the underlying causes of ME/CFS. Methods
The
study was approved by the local human ethics (HREC/15/QGC/63 and
GU:2014/838) committee of Griffith University and the Gold Coast University
Hospital where scanning was performed. Written informed consent was obtained from
18 ME/CFS patients, meeting ICC criteria11, and 26 gender-matched healthy controls.
The diffusion data were
acquired using a 3T Skyra MRI scanner (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany)
with a 64-channel head-neck coil (Nova Medical, Wilmington, USA). Diffusion
acquisition parameters 65 noncollinear directions at single shell b values (3000
sec/mm2) and one image was acquired without using any diffusion gradient. The
parameter was as follow: repetition time/echo time = 5035/114.8 ms, field of
view (FOV)= 230 $$$\times$$$230, matrix=96 $$$\times$$$96, voxel dimension of 2.4$$$\times$$$ 2.4 $$$\times$$$ 2.4 mm3, and 60 slices. The acquisition time was 11.26
minutes. MR images were acquired in both patients and healthy controls (HC)
with the same scanner, using the same scanning parameters.
Diffusion-weighted data were denoised
and corrected for eddy current and motion distortion using mrtrix3 ( https://www.mrtrix.org/ ). Diffusion tensor, its three
eigenvalues, and FA images were then calculated using tools provided with
FMRIB’s Diffusion Toolbox (FDT, part of Software Library FSL12 (http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl). λ1, λ2, λ3, FA, MD, and RD maps were calculated
using ‘dtifit’ and individual subject maps were aligned to the Montreal Neurological
Institute (MNI) template using the tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS)
toolkit of the FSL.
Voxel-based
statistical analysis of the λ1, λ2, λ3, FA, MD, and RD of the two groups
was performed in SPM12. To test for group differences, a 2-sample T-test was
performed controlling for age and gender. Voxel clusters in the T statistic map
were defined using an uncorrected voxel p-value threshold (p<0.001, 0.002,
0.003, or 0.004) and a cluster size threshold of 100 voxels. Statistical
inference was measured with the false discovery rate corrected cluster p-value
(cluster p-FDR). Significant clusters were overlaid on T1-weighted image
(mni_icbm152_t1_tal_nlin_sym_09a).Results
We performed voxel-based analysis on DTI
metrics (λ1, λ2, λ3, FA, MD, and RD) estimated from 18 ME/CFS patients and 26
healthy controls data. Fig. 1 shows significant decrease in voxel clusters in λ1,
λ2, MD, and RD in the pons region for the ME/CFS patients. Fig. 2 showed significant increases in voxel
clusters for ME/CFS in λ3 and RD in the medulla region (white arrow) and cuneus
(black arrow). Group comparison of FA did not show any significant cluster. Cluster
statistics of DTI metrics are presented in Table 1. Discussion
We used DTI metrics to study tissue
microstructural changes in ME/CFS patients compared to healthy controls. This
is the first study to show significant decreases in MD, RD, λ1, and λ2, in the
pons region of the ME/CFS patients. This could be due to an increase in cell
density and/or reduced cell size13. We also found an increase in λ3 and RD
in the cuneus and medulla region in ME/CFS patients compared to HC that could
be due to changes in myelination7. Interestingly, FA did not show any
significant differences between ME/CFS patients and HC, unlike other neurodegenerative
studies7. Changes in MD and RD, but not FA, were
also seen in traumatic brain injury14.Conclusion
In this study, we used DTI metrics to
investigate microstructural abnormalities in ME/CFS patients. We concluded that
eigenvalues (λ1, λ2, and λ3) and the derived metrics (MD and RD) are more
sensitive to changes in tissue microstructure in ME/CFS patients. Additionally, brainstem abnormalities may be a
diagnostic marker that better help us to understand the pathomechanism of
ME/CFS patients. Acknowledgements
We thank the patients and healthy
controls who donated their time and effort to participate in this study. This
study was supported by the Stafford Fox Medical Research Foundation, the Judith
Jane Mason Foundation (MAS2015F024), Mr. Douglas Stutt, and the Blake-Beckett
Foundation, Ian and Talei Stewart, Buxton Foundation, and McCusker
Charitable Foundation. The
financial support did not affect any aspect of the study.References
1. Fukuda,
K. The Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Comprehensive Approach to Its Definition and
Study. Ann. Intern. Med. 121, 953 (1994).
2. Lange, G. et al. Brain MRI
abnormalities exist in a subset of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. J.
Neurol. Sci. 171, 3–7 (1999).
3. Lange, G. et al. Quantitative
assessment of cerebral ventricular volumes in chronic fatigue syndrome. Appl.
Neuropsychol. 8, 23–30 (2001).
4. Barnden, L. R. et al. Intra
brainstem connectivity is impaired in chronic fatigue syndrome. NeuroImage
Clin. 24, 102045 (2019).
5. Cope, H. & David, A. S.
Neuroimaging in chronic fatigue syndrome. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry
60, 471–473 (1996).
6. Lewis, D. H. et al. Monozygotic
Twins Discordant for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Regional Cerebral Blood Flow
SPECT. Radiology 219, 766–773 (2001).
7. Dong, Q. et al. Clinical
applications of diffusion tensor imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 19,
6–18 (2004).
8. Pierpaoli, C., Jezzard, P., Basser, P.
J., Barnett, A. & Di Chiro, G. Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human
brain. Radiology 201, 637–648 (1996).
9. Zeineh, M. M. et al. Right
Arcuate Fasciculus Abnormality in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Radiology 274,
517–526 (2014).
10. Kimura, Y. et al. Brain
abnormalities in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: Evaluation
by diffusional kurtosis imaging and neurite orientation dispersion and density
imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 49, 818–824 (2019).
11. Carruthers, B. M. et al. Myalgic
encephalomyelitis: International Consensus Criteria. J. Intern. Med. 270,
327–338 (2011).
12. Smith, S. M. et al. Advances in
functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. NeuroImage
23 Suppl 1, S208-219 (2004).
13. Weinstein, M. et al. Abnormal
white matter integrity in young children with autism. Hum. Brain Mapp. 32,
534–543 (2011).
14. Maller, J. J. et al. The
(Eigen)value of diffusion tensor imaging to investigate depression after traumatic
brain injury. Hum. Brain Mapp. 35, 227–237 (2014).