Alireza Fallahi1, Neda Mohammadi-Mobarakeh2, Narges Hosseini Tabatabaei3, Mohammad Pooyan4, Jafar Mehvari-Habibabadi5, Mohammad-Reza Ay2, and Mohammad-Reza Nazem-Zadeh2
1Shahed University, Tehran, Iran (Islamic Republic of), 2Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Islamic Republic of), 3Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Islamic Republic of), 4Biomedical Engineering Department, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran (Islamic Republic of), 5dr.mehvari@hotmail.com, Isfahan, Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Synopsis
In this study, a decision making
method was developed for determination epileptogenicity in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE) patients using different neuroimaging markers including hippocampal
volume, and FLAIR (Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery) intensity and MD (Mean Diffusivity) value in
hippocampus, FA (Fractional anisotropy) in posteroinferior cingulum, and FA in crus
of fornix from MRI images of T1, FLAIR, and DTI (diffusion tensor imaging). The aim of this study is to creating an
automated classification algorithm using decision tree and random forest methods.
Result of applied method detected essential rules for prediction of laterality
in individual mTLE patients.
Introduction
Mesial temporal
lobe epilepsy (mTLE) is the most common type of pharmacoresistant focal
epilepsy that patient candidate for surgical treatment 1,2 .The
success of surgery depends on the accurate localization of seizure onset. In this study using multistructural MR images of T1, FLAIR (Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery),
and DTI (Diffusion Tensor Imaging),
we proposed a classification algorithm using decision tree method, which was
applied for finding essential rules for prediction of laterality in individual
mTLE patients. We also used random forest techniques for understanding the
importance of extracted imaging attributes.Methods
Thirty-five unilateral mTLE patients who had
candidates for surgical resection were studied prospectively. Hemispheric
variation uncertainty (HVU) of hippocampal T1 volumetry and FLAIR intensity was
estimated from structural MRI
using a 64-channel phased-array head coil on a 3-Tesla scanner (Siemens Prisma,
Erlangen, Germany) at Iranian National Brain Mapping Laboratory (NMBL). Anatomic
images were acquired for clinical diagnosis using a standardized protocol
including transverse T1 weighted images using MPRAGEIR protocol with the
following imaging parameter: TR = 1840 ms, TI=900 ms, TE = 2.43ms, flip angle =
8°, matrix = 224
224, in-plane resolusion=1.0
1.0
,slice thickness = 1.0 mm, pixel bandwidth = 250
Hz/pixel.
HVU levels of mean diffusivity (MD) in the
hippocampus and fractional anisotropy (FA) in posteroinferior cingulum and crus
of fornix were also estimated from DTI. Multishell DTI images (b-values of 1000 and 2000 s/mm2)in 64 diffusion
gradient directions on each shell along with a set of null images (b-value of 0
s/mm2) were acquired using echo planar imaging (EPI) onsame machine in anterior
to posterior phase direction with the following imaging parameters: TR = 9600
ms, TE = 92 ms, flip angle = 90
, matrix = 110
110, in-plane
resolusion = 2.0
.0
, slice thickness = 2.0 mm, pixel bandwidth = 1420 Hz/pixel.
Each estimated HVU value was used as a ground
to compare the interhemispheric change in the corresponding imaging attribute
with and to establish a label of laterality ‘beyond the uncertainty’ for
individual mTLE cases.
Decision tree method was applied on laterality
labels to provide predictive methods for lateralization of mTLE. In this method
the classification are represented as a set of rules that are applied
sequentially with each rule partitioning an attribute (predictor variable) into
a binary response. We performed the CART algorithm 3 to train decision trees using MATLAB r2018a 4.
Random Forest method was used for detecting
the attributes’ importance. It is an ensemble method,
which used a large number of decision trees (e.g. 1000)5.This method applies the
randomness in two ways: (i) using a random subset of the observations
(bootstrapped sampling) for creating each of the trees, and (ii) each split in
a tree is created using a random subset of the candidate variables 5.Results
The results of applying the CART model are
shown in Fig 1. We used 10-fold cross-validation for training and evaluation
trees. Best results with 80% correct rate were selected for establishing the rules
for lateralizing left versus right mTLE. decision
tree method suggested the hippocampal volume and MD as crucial
attributes to predict the laterality, while the FA in cingulum and fornix were
not as effective. The result of attribute importance measurement using a random
forest of 1000 tree is displayed in Fig.2. As the figure shows, the consented
attributes of hippocampal volume and MD were demonstrated as the most influencive
attributes. FA in posteroinferior cingulum and FA in fornix crus were shown of the
least degree of importance. These results agreed with the results of decision
tree reported by some previous papers6,7. Conclusion
The proposed decision tree and random
forest methods may provide reliable lateralization of mTLE and introduce an
effective tool for a better assessment of efficacy for neuroimaging biomarkers
in real clinical setups. The definition of laterality in patients who do not
maintain a clear laterality based on clinical and electrophysiological evidence
is a potential application of the proposed predictive model.Acknowledgements
We must acknowledge the
contribution of Iranian National Brain Mapping Lab (NBNL) and their staffs for
MRI data acquisition throughout conducting this project. This work was
partially funded and supported by Iran’s National Elites Foundation, National
Institute for Medical Research Development (Grant No. 971683), and Cognitive Sciences
& Technologies Council (Grant No. 6431), between 2017 and 2019.References
1. Engel J. Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy:
What Have We Learned? Neurosci. 2001;7(4):340-352.
doi:10.1177/107385840100700410
2. Téllez-Zenteno JF, Hernández-Ronquillo L.
A Review of the Epidemiology of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. Epilepsy Res Treat.
2012;2012:1-5. doi:10.1155/2012/630853
3. Leo Breiman, Jerome Friedman, Charles J.
Stone RAO. Classification and Regression Trees. In: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
; 1984:368 Pages.
4. TheMathWorks Inc., Natick, Massachusetts
2015. MATLAB, version 8.5.0.197613 R2015a. 2015.
5. Grömping U. Variable Importance
Assessment in Regression: Linear Regression versus Random Forest. Am Stat.
2009;63(4):308-319. doi:10.1198/tast.2009.08199
6. Nazem-Zadeh MR, Elisevich K V., Schwalb
JM, Bagher-Ebadian H, Mahmoudi F, Soltanian-Zadeh H. Lateralization of temporal
lobe epilepsy by multimodal multinomial hippocampal response-driven models. J
Neurol Sci. 2014;347(1-2):107-118. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2014.09.029
7. Mahmoudi F, Elisevich K, Bagher-ebadian
H, et al. Data mining MR image features of select structures for lateralization
of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. 2018;i:1-19.