Jakob Jordan1, Gergely Bertalan1, Heiko Tzschätzsch1, Tom Meyer1, Anton Gauert2, Anja Heeren-Hagemann2, Jürgen Braun3, and Ingolf Sack1
1Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 2Department of Hematology/Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 3Institute of Medical Informatic, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Synopsis
Zebrafish
have emerged as a versatile, cost-efficient and easy-to-handle animal model in many
areas of biomedical research. Using multifrequency MR elastography at 7-Tesla and
1000 to 1400 Hz excitation frequency, we analyzed the viscoelastic properties of
the post-mortem zebrafish brain. Shear wave speed as a surrogate marker of
stiffness was mapped with an in-plane resolution of 40 microns showing stiffer properties
(1.2±0.3 m/s) of the brain than skeletal muscle (0.89±0.09 m/s). Furthermore, sub-regions
showed distinct stiffness properties, which, however, lacked significance in
this preliminary feasibility study.
Introduction
Over the
past four decades, Zebrafish (Danio rerio) have emerged as a versatile animal model in developmental
research, muscle regeneration2, toxicology3 and more recently, cancer research1. The zebrafish genome is remarkably similar to that of
humans. 70% of its genes have homologs to the human genome and 82% of genes
associated with human diseases have also been found in zebrafish4.
In addition, the optical transparency of zebrafish embryos and some adult
genetic mutants, high fecundity, rapid growth rate, and comparative ease of
husbandry make the zebrafish an attractive animal model for biomedical
research. Common methods to investigate zebrafish include optical microscopy
and cell analysis1. Biophysical parameters such as stiffness of
zebrafish tissue have been reported based on invasively administered beads5
and optical tweezer experiments6. However, due to the local nature
of this approach and surface-limited optical microscopy, no maps of stiffness
of the zebrafish brain have been reported so far. Magnetic resonance
elastography (MRE) has been widely used to measure viscoelastic properties in
human and animal soft tissue. Preliminary elastography data of zebrafish have
been reported by ultrasound elastography (US)7, however without
providing spatially resolved stiffness maps. In this study, we aim to apply
high-resolution multifrequency MRE for stiffness mapping of the adult zebrafish
brain. Our aim is to provide first reference stiffness data of the zebrafish
brain including spatially resolved maps for sub-regional analysis.Methods
20
adult zebrafish of 2 to 24 months of age were killed by submersion in ice water
for at least 3 minutes8, embedded in ultrasound gel and placed in a
glass tube of 4 mm inner diameter. The glass tube was mounted on a nonmagnetic
piezo ceramic actuator (CEDRAT Technologies, France) as illustrated in figure
1. The actuator was driven by a function generator (CGC Instruments, Germany)
in synchrony to the clock of the MRI scanner. Imaging was performed in a 7T
preclinical MRI scanner (Bruker Biospec, Germany) with a custom built, 5 mm
bore volume resonator by RAPID Biomedical (Rimpar, Germany). The scanner was
running on ParaVision 6.0.1 and we measured our samples with an in-house MRE
sequence based on a spin-echo sequence. Using the piezo actuator,
we induced harmonic vibration of 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4 kHz frequency which
were encoded with 14, 15, 17, 18 and 19 cycles of a bipolar motion encoding
gradient which was synchronized to the vibration. The samples were measured
with a voxel size of 40 × 40 × 600 µm³, a field of view of 4 × 4 mm, an echo
time (TE) of 38 ms and a relaxation time (TR) of 3000 ms. Four dynamics of the
wave were captured evenly spaced over a vibration period. Total measure time
was approx. 20 minutes for each frequency. The resulting complex wave images
were inverted to shear wave speed (SWS) maps using multifrequency wave-number
reconstruction (k-MDEV)9. The SWS maps were then analyzed for
sub-regional differences by manually delineating the following anatomical regions
of interest (ROI): whole brain, telencephalon, optic tectum and skeletal muscle.
Statistical significance was assessed by the Wilcoxon rank sum test.Results
Figure
2 shows representative wave images for each frequency (taken from slice b)
in Figure 3). Good wave propagation though the brain is visible. Figure 3 shows
the resulting SWS map of a one year old zebrafish. The optic tectum, telencephalon,
eyes and mouth are easily identifiable by their distinct stiffness properties. Figure
4 shows mean SWS values for each investigated fish and region. Mean SWS values of
brain regions were 1.2 ± 0.3 m/s, 1.1 ± 0.3 m/s, 1.3 ± 0.2 m/s for the whole
brain, telencephalon, and optic tectum, respectively. No significant difference
was found between the different brain regions. In contrast, with a mean SWS of 0.89 ± 0.09
m/s, skeletal muscle was softer than brain tissue (p<0.05).Discussion & Conclusion
To
the best of our knowledge, this study presents for the first time spatially
resolved SWS maps of the adult zebrafish. In a recent study, SWS of the
zebrafish was reported based on ultrasound elastography, however, without
spatial resolution7. The reported values (5.07 ± 1.45 m/s) obtained at
500 Hz excitation frequency were higher than our values despite that values
were averaged across muscle and brain. More experiments are needed to address
viscoelastic dispersion, regional difference and a possible age effect. Nevertheless, this preliminary
proof-of-concept study expands the range of possible MRE applications into
zebrafish, which is an established animal model for a wide variety of diseases.Acknowledgements
This
research was supported by GRK2260 (BIOQIC) of the German Research
Foundation.References
1. Gauert, A. et al. Fast, in vivo model for drug-response prediction in patients with b-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancers (Basel). 12, 1–13 (2020).
2. Poss, K. D., Wilson, L. G. & Keating, M. T. Heart regeneration in zebrafish. Science (80-. ). 298, 2188–2190 (2002).
3. Lammer, E. et al. Is the fish embryo toxicity test (FET) with the zebrafish (Danio rerio) a potential alternative for the fish acute toxicity test? Comp. Biochem. Physiol. - C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 149, 196–209 (2009).
4. Howe, K. et al. The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome. Nature 496, 498–503 (2013).
5. Träber, N. et al. Polyacrylamide Bead Sensors for in vivo Quantification of Cell-Scale Stress in Zebrafish Development. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–14 (2019).
6. Hörner, F. et al. Holographic optical tweezers-based in vivo manipulations in zebrafish embryos. J. Biophotonics 10, 1492–1501 (2017).
7. Zhang, X., Zhang, A. X., Zhou, B. & Xu, X. A feasibility study fornoninvasive measurement of shear wave speed in live zebrafish. Ultrasonics 107, 106170 (2020).
8. Wallace, C. K. et al. Effectiveness of Rapid Cooling as a Method of Euthanasia for Young Zebrafish ( Danio rerio ). 57, (2018).
9. Tzschätzsch, H. et al. Tomoelastography by multifrequency wave number recovery from time-harmonic propagating shear waves. Med. Image Anal. 30, 1–10 (2016).