Anna Morr1, Marcin Nowicki2, Gergely Bertalan1, Rafaela Vieira da Silva1, Carmen Infante Duarte1, Stefan Paul Koch1, Philipp Boehm-Sturm1, Ute Krügel2, Jürgen Braun1, Barbara Steiner1, Josef Käs2, Thomas Fuhs2, and Ingolf Sack1
1Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 2Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
Synopsis
In this study, we investigated the mechanical
properties of subregions of the murine dentate gyrus in vivo using MR
elastography (MRE) and ex vivo with atomic force microscopy (AFM). Consistent
with AFM, subregional analysis of the dentate gyrus by MRE revealed that the subgranular
zone (SGZ), in which adult neurogenesis takes place, is characterized by marked
soft-solid properties. We conclude that MRE is sensitive to micromechanical
properties beyond the image resolution. The observed soft-solid material
properties of the SGZ quantified by AFM and MRE might be of functional
relevance for neurogenesis in the mouse brain.
Introduction
The
hippocampus consists of different regions such as the dentate gyrus (DG) with
the subgranular zone (SGZ). The SGZ is one of the zones in the murine brain where
neurogenesis occurs [1]. Using atomic
force microscopy (AFM) and other micro-indentation methods, the elastic
heterogeneity of the hippocampus and the DG was analysed ex vivo [2-4]. However,
these studies never investigated the neurogenic niche, based on an anatomical
marker and were never correlated with in vivo mechanical properties
quantified by MR elastography (MRE). Therefore, this study aimed to (i) investigate
the elastic properties of the neurogenic niche, the SGZ, using fluorescent
neuronal stem cells as an anatomical marker in combination with AFM and (ii)
test if in vivo MRE can resolve sub-voxel mechanical properties of the
SGZ in the murine DG consistent with the findings of (i). Methods
All
measurements of the murine brain were performed coronal in the area bregma -2.2
mm to - 2.3 mm [5].
MRE
10
C57BL/6J mice (8 weeks old) were scanned at a 7-T small-animal scanner (Bruker BioSpec,
Ettlingen, Germany). Waves images using multifrequency tomoelastography were acquired
utilizing 5 frequencies ranging from 1000Hz-1400Hz (7slices, 0.8mm thickness,
TE=53ms, TR=4000ms, FOV=16.2x10.8mm², matrix size=90x60). A costume-made driver
system with a nonmagnetic piezoceramic actuator generated the vibrations [6]. k-MDEV
inversion was used to determine the shear wave speed (c in m/s) as a surrogate
marker of stiffness. MDEV inversion was used to reconstruct the phase angle of
the complex shear modulus (φ in
rad, named loss angle) as measure of tissue fluidity.
c and
φ maps of the
murine brain were registered to the Allen brain atlas [5]. Masks corresponding
to the hippocampus (containing CA1, CA2, and CA3) and DG were automatically generated
(figure1A, left). To determine subregional differences in the DG and to isolate
the SGZ, the DG mask was scaled down in a pixel-wise manner (figure 2A, C).
AFM
6 Tg(Nes-EGFP)33Enik/J
mice (7-9 weeks old), which express the green fluorescence protein (GFP)
under the nestin-promoter, visualizing neuronal stem cells and progenitor cells,
were transcardially perfused with ice cold phosphate buffered saline. Coronal
brain slices of 350µm thickness were prepared. Elastic properties were obtained
by indentation measurements using an AFM (Nanowizard4, JPK, figure 3A). For
this purpose, commercially available cantilevers (0,2 N/m, CONT, Nanoworld)
were modified by gluing a small polysterene bead (diameter ~ 6 µm) onto the
tip. During measurements, tissue was placed in artificial cerebrospinal fluid, supplemented
with synthetic air with 5% CO2. For each slice, a profile of 10-15 x
120-150 pixels over the DG, comprising the SGZ, was acquired (figure 3B). For
anatomical orientation, fluorescence, visualizing the SGZ, was used. For each
measurement point the Young’s modulus (E in Pa) and local fluorescent intensity
was determined. A threshold value for the fluorescent intensity was determined
visually and elasticity values were grouped accordingly. Results
In
vivo MRE shows regional viscoelastic differences between
hippocampus subzones (CA1, CA2, CA3) and DG, which has a significantly lower
stiffness and loss angle (c in m/s 4.58±0.19 vs. 3.46±0.18, p<0,0001; ϕ in
rad 0.78±0.1 vs. 0.68±0.12, p=0.0003, figure 1A-B). Furthermore, MRE shows a
significant reduction in c and ϕ in a subregional analysis of the DG (figure 2B
left & D left, for statistics see figure 5). The reduction becomes apparent
when the relative change in c and ϕ obtained by eroded masks (one, two and
three pixels erosion) is analyzed relative to full DG values (figure 2B right,
D right). In all mice, softening and transition from more fluid to solid properties
was observed when approaching the SGZ (figure 2A, 2B). A summary of our
statistical analysis is given in figure 4. Ex vivo AFM measurements are consistent
with in vivo MRE measurements and show that the SGZ, marked by a high fluorescence
signal (figure 3C), shows a reduced stiffness over AFM 15 measurements in 8 acute
brain slices (128.50 ± 72.09 vs. 78.49 ± 39.08, p=0.0003, figure 3D).Discussion
Our
findings show that in vivo MRE is able to detect subregional and
microscopic viscoelastic differences in the DG. Isolation of the SGZ by
reducing the DG mask in size, allows to detect the lower stiffness and a
transition from fluid to solid properties. This finding is consistent with our ex
vivo AFM data. Here we precisely identified the SGZ using the fluorescence
signal intrinsically expressed by neuronal stem and progenitor cells in this
tissue. Higher fluorescence values corresponded to lower stiffness values, providing
evidence that the SGZ is softer than the surrounding tissue. Probably, this
specific structural features of the SGZ are determined by the unique biological
composition of neuronal stem and progenitor cells [4, 7], their
interaction with the surrounding matrix and by the special environmental
requirements for proliferation and maturation in the process of neurogenesis [4, 8].Conclusion
MRE can
detect subregional viscoelastic differences in the murine DG in a sub-pixel
resolution consistent with micro-mechanical tests by AFM. We detected marked
soft-solid properties in the SGZ of the murine DG, which may point towards
functional mechanical properties associated with neurogenesis. Acknowledgements
Funding from the German Research Foundation (GRK 2260
BIOQIC, SFB1340 Matrix in Vision) is gratefully acknowledged.References
1. Kempermann, G., et al., Milestones
of neuronal development in the adult hippocampus. Trends in neurosciences,
2004. 27(8): p. 447-452.
2. Antonovaite, N., et al., Regional
variations in stiffness in live mouse brain tissue determined by
depth-controlled indentation mapping. Scientific reports, 2018. 8(1): p. 1-11.
3. Elkin, B.S., et al., Mechanical
heterogeneity of the rat hippocampus measured by atomic force microscope
indentation. Journal of neurotrauma, 2007. 24(5): p. 812-822.
4. Luque, T., et al., Microelastic
mapping of the rat dentate gyrus. Royal Society Open Science, 2016. 3(4): p. 150702.
5. Science, A.I.f.B. Allen
brain atlas reference atlas v1 2008
[cited 2020; v1:[Available from: http://mouse.brain-map.org/experiment/siv?id=100142143&imageId=102162514&imageType=atlas&initImage=atlas&showSubImage=y&contrast=0.5,0.5,0,255,4.
6. Bertalan, G., et al., Fast
tomoelastography of the mouse brain by multifrequency single-shot MR
elastography. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2019. 81(4): p. 2676-2687.
7. Chen, L., et al., Statistical
study of biomechanics of living brain cells during growth and maturation on
artificial substrates. Biomaterials, 2016. 106: p. 240-249.
8. Rammensee, S., et al., Dynamics
of mechanosensitive neural stem cell differentiation. Stem cells, 2017. 35(2): p. 497-506.