SHUANG MENG1, Ailian Liu1, Lihua Chen1, Qinhe Zhang1, Qingwei Song1, and Yunsong Liu1
1The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
Synopsis
It remains a challenge to
diagnose the oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa) due to the ambiguous
definition of oligometastatic PCa. Previous studies had shown that dynamic
contrast enhanced (DCE) - MRI imaging could be used to assess
tumor aggressiveness. This study indicated that
transfer constant (Ktrans) had the potential to assess the
aggressiveness of PCa. And Ktrans combined with clinical characteristics (such
as age and prostate specific antigen) had the higher diagnostic efficiency for
oligometastatic and widely metastasis PCa.
Introduction
“Oligometastasis”
was first proposed by Hellman and Weichselbaum in 1995 [1]. Oligomeric prostate
cancer (PCa) indicates the intermediate state between local and advanced
metastatic disease. In previous studies, the definition of oligometastatic PCa depended
on the number of bone metastatic lesions (usually 3 to 5) [2]. Although the
definition of oligometastatic PCa is not clear, studies have suggested that
treatment of the primary tumor might provide a survival benefit to oligometastatic
PCa patients [3-4]. Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) - MRI imaging could be used
to assess tumor aggressiveness [5]. Purpose
To evaluate the
diagnostic performances of Tofts model (TM) in assessing oligometastatic PCa.Methods
All PCa patients from
January 2018 to December 2019, who underwent 3.0T MR scanning with DCE sequence
were enrolled in this study. Patients with 1) treatment by chemotherapy,
radiation therapy, endocrine therapy; 2) low image quality were excluded. Finally,
54 PCa patients were included in this study. Age ranged from 60 to 87 years, mean
age 74±7.4 years. A 3.0T MR scanner (Signa HDxt, General
Electric) and an 8-channel phased-array surface coil were used. DCE-MRI was
performed using an axial T1-weighted spoiled gradient recalled sequence (repetition
time 3 ms, echo time 1 ms, field of view 40×32 cm2, number of excitations 0.69, slice
thickness 3.6 mm, slice spacing 0 mm, scan duration 3 minutes 42 seconds). Two
T1-weighted images were acquired before a bolus of 0.1 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA was administered.
A total of 40 time phases are scanned, each time phase is about 6s.GenIQ
software was used to calculate statistics of the regions of interest (ROIs) of
pharmacokinetic model parameters transfer constant (Ktrans), rate constant
(Kep), and and extravascular extracellular space (Ve) (Figure 1). The
region of interest (ROI) was placed on the largest slice of the tumor, and
contained the whole tumor as much as possible. According to the number
of bone metastatic lesions, the PCa patients were individed to three group: localized
lesions group (no bone metastatic lesion), oligometastatic metastatic group (the
number of bone metastatic lesions less than but equal to three)
and widely metastatic group ( the number of bone metastatic lesions more than three).
The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to test the consistency
of the two observers. The differences among groups were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis
test or One-way ANOVA test. Logistic regression was used to assess the quantitive
metrics associated with the diagnosis of discriminating oligometastatic from widely
metastasis PCa. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC)
curves to distinguish oligometastatic from widely metastasis PCa were estimated
for quantitive metrics of DCE. The diagnostic potential was determined by
calculating the area under the curve (AUC). Youden Index (Youden index = sensitivity +
specificity - 1) was calculated and used for determining threshold values of quantitive
metrics of DCE. Results
Inter-observer
repeatability agreement was excellent in the orbital mass for all the TM
parameters (ICC = 97%, 99% and 98% for Ve, Kep and Ktrans, respectively). There was a difference between oligometastatic group and
widely
metastasis group (P=0.034). There were no significant differences in Ve and Kep
among the groups (P>0.05) . Logistic regression results showed that Ktrans
can discriminate oligometastatic from widely metastasis PCa (OR<0.001,95% CI:0.000-0.028). The combination of Ktrans,
age and PSA had the higher diagnostic potential for oligometastatic PCa (AUC,
0.958), compared with only Ktrans (AUC, 0.770) (Table 1, Figure 2).Discussion
Ktrans may be more efficient than Kep and Ve in the diagnosis of discriminating
oligometastatic
from widely metastasis PCa. The reason may be that the hypoxic
microenvironment in the tumor causes the up-regulation of vascular endothelial
growth factor (VEGF) with the tumor progressing . VEGF
induces vascular leakage and increases interstitial fluid pressure (IFP).
Importantly, Ktrans is related to microcirculation perfusion and microvascular
permeability, which is why it can sensitively respond to the increase of IFP.Conclusion
Ktrans had the potential to assess the aggressiveness of PCa. Ktrans combined with clinical characteristics
(such as age and PSA) had the higher diagnostic efficiency for oligometastatic and
widely metastasis PCa.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Hellman S, Weichselbaum RR. Oligometastases. J
Clin Oncol. 1995 Jan;13(1):8-10. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.1.8. PMID: 7799047.
[2] Rii J, Sakamoto S, Yamada Y, Takeshita N, Yamamoto
S, Sazuka T, Imamura Y, Nakamura K, Komiya A, Komaru A, Fukasawa S, Nakatsu H,
Akakura K, Ichikawa T. Prognostic factors influencing overall survival in de
novo oligometastatic prostate cancer patients. Prostate. 2020 Aug;80(11):850-858.
doi: 10.1002/pros.24016. Epub 2020 Jun 5. PMID: 32501559.
[3] Rusthoven CG, Carlson JA, Waxweiler TV, Raben D, Dewitt
PE, Crawford ED, Maroni PD, Kavanagh BD. The impact of definitive local therapy
for lymph node-positive prostate cancer: a population-based study. Int J Radiat
Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Apr 1;88(5):1064-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.01.008.
PMID: 24661660.
[4] Lin CC, Gray PJ, Jemal A, Efstathiou JA. Androgen
deprivation with or without radiation therapy for clinically node-positive
prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 May 9;107(7):djv119. doi:
10.1093/jnci/djv119. PMID: 25957435.
[5] Vos EK, Litjens GJ, Kobus T, Hambrock T,
Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Barentsz JO, Huisman HJ, Scheenen TW. Assessment of
prostate cancer aggressiveness using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic
resonance imaging at 3 T. Eur Urol. 2013 Sep;64(3):448-55. doi:
10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.045. Epub 2013 May 31. PMID: 23751135.