Jessica K.R. Boult1, Mahmoud El Shemerly2, Felix Bachmann2, Laurenz Kellenberger2, Heidi Lane2, Paul McSheehy2, and Simon P. Robinson1
1The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom, 2Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd, Basel 4005, Switzerland
Synopsis
Derazantinib
(DZB), a FGFR inhibitor, has displayed potential anti-angiogenic effects in
biochemical assays. In this study, we used in
vitro and in vivo assays to
explore this activity. Proliferation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells,
their pVEGFR expression and downstream signalling, and vascular permeability in
mouse skin are dose-dependently supressed by DZB. Susceptibility-contrast MRI
using ferumoxytol demonstrated a reduction in fractional blood volume in subcutaneous
colorectal cancer xenografts treated with DZB for 48h. This anti-angiogenic
effect may be a relevant component of the activity of DZB in tumours bearing
FGFR aberrations and may
facilitate clinical activity against other solid tumours.
Introduction
Angiogenesis is
important for the growth and development of tumours, and anti-angiogenic
therapy has proved a successful treatment in the clinic for a number of solid
tumours.
Derazantinib
(DZB) is an inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptors 1-3 (FGFR1-3),
which has shown significant activity in phase 2 clinical trials in FGFR2-fusion
positive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.1 Biochemical kinase assays indicate potential activity against other important
targets in oncology, including CSF1R and VEGFR2,2,3 and DZB
can inhibit phosphorylation of CSF1R upon ligand stimulation in mouse
macrophages ex vivo (GI50=100nM)
at tolerable doses.2 To
explore the potential of VEGFR2 as a target of DZB, in vitro and in vivo
assays, including susceptibility-contrast MRI, were utilised, and comparisons
made to the specific VEGFR inhibitor vatalanib.Methods
Human umbilical
vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were cultured to 50% confluence and incubated
with DZB (7nM-2µM) for 72h prior to the assessment of cell growth inhibition using a crystal violet assay to determine the GI50. Cells were also
starved for 2h and treated for 1h with DZB (100nM or 1µM) or vatalanib (100nM
or 1µM) followed by incubation with/out VEGF (100ng/ml) for 10min. Cells were
then harvested in protein lysis buffer, and the lysates assessed by Western
blot using specific antibodies against phospho-VEGFR2 and phospho-MEK1/2 (Cell
Signaling Technology). Western blot images were quantified using the
EvolutionCapt programme.
To assess the
effect of DZB on vascular permeability, male ICR mice were treated for 24-72h
with DZB (25-100mg/kg p.o. daily), vehicle (dimethyl acetamide:cremophor
EL:propylene glycol:acetate buffer 0.2M pH5, 1:1:3:5) or vatalanib as a
positive control (50% PEG300 in PBS, 50mg/kg, p.o. twice a day).4 A Miles
assay was then performed, measuring leakage of Evans blue into the skin 3h
after i.v. injection (40mg/kg)
and 0.5h after i.d. injection of VEGF (20ng/0.1ml).
For MRI studies, human
SW1222 colorectal cancer cells were grown subcutaneously on the flank of female
athymic nude mice and imaged when tumours reached 250±50mm3.
Susceptibility-contrast (SC) MRI was
performed on a Bruker Biospec 7T system over a 3cm field of view using a
4cm volume coil with the tumour surrounded by dental paste to minimise
susceptibility artefacts. Multi-slice T2-weighted images (RARE;
TR=4500ms, TEeff=36ms)
were acquired for planning and tumour volume calculation. Multi-gradient recalled echo (MGRE) images (TR=200ms, 8 echoes 3-24ms) were acquired from 3 central 1mm
thick transverse slices to quantify R2* prior to and following intravenous
administration of USPIO particles (150µmolFe/kg, ferumoxytol). MGRE data were fitted on a voxel-by-voxel basis using
a Bayesian maximum a posteriori approach, providing maps of R2*, ΔR2*USPIO
and fractional blood volume (fBV); median values for whole tumour ROIs are
reported.5
Mice were treated
for 48h with DZB (80mg/kg daily, n=6), vehicle (n=5) or vatalanib (50mg/kg
twice a day, n=4), following which the SC-MRI protocol was repeated. The perfusion
marker Hoechst 33342 (15mg/kg) was given i.v. for 1 minute before the tumour
was excised and snap frozen. Perfused vasculature was assessed on 10µm sections
by fluorescence microscopy and sections were then stained with H&E.Results
HUVEC
proliferation was dose dependently inhibited by DZB with an approximate GI50
of 400nM (Figure 1a). DZB also inhibited expression of pVEGFR2 and downstream pMEK1/2
in a similarly dose dependent manner (Figure 1b). Miles assays of vascular
permeability in the skin were more sensitive to the effects of DZB and
vatalanib at 24h than at 48 or 72h. At 24h, DZB dose dependently decreased
Evans blue permeability with 75mg/kg resulting in a mean reduction of 58%
compared to vehicle treated controls; in comparison, vatalanib caused an 88% reduction
(p<0.001; one-way ANOVA) (Figure 1c).
Neither DZB nor
vatalanib affected the growth rate of SW1222 tumours over 48h treatment, and
the doses given were well tolerated (Figure 2). Figure 3 shows example
parametric maps of baseline R2*,
ΔR2*USPIO and fBV prior to and following treatment with
DZB, vatalanib or vehicle. No
change in baseline R2* over 48h treatment was observed in any of the
treatment groups (Figure 4). USPIO-induced ΔR2* and fBV were reduced by an
average of 21% and 20%, respectively, in DZB treated tumours (Figure 4).
Significant decreases in ΔR2*USPIO
and fBV of 47% and 37%, respectively, were observed in vatalanib treated
tumours. No change in ΔR2*USPIO
or fBV was observed in vehicle treated tumours.
Fluorescence
microscopy of Hoechst 33342 demonstrated that both agents tended to reduce the
functional perfused vasculature but this was not significant in this cohort
(Figure 5).Discussion
DZB inhibits
HUVEC proliferation and VEGFR2 signalling in
vitro at concentrations achievable in mice and patients, and decreases skin
permeability in vivo.
Absolute values
of tumour fBV determined using SC-MRI with ferumoxytol were in agreement with
those previously reported in SW1222 xenografts and other subcutaneous tumour
models using alternative USPIO particle preparations.5,6
DZB decreased
USPIO-induced ΔR2*
and fBV in SW1222 xenografts in a weaker, but comparable, manner to the
specific VEGFR-inhibitor vatalanib. The data are consistent with a moderate
anti-angiogenic effect, which may be a relevant component of the activity of
DZB in solid tumours bearing FGFR aberrations and could facilitate clinical activity against solid tumours without
FGFR modifications.Acknowledgements
We acknowledge CR-UK programme grant (C16412/A27725).References
1. Mazzaferro V, El-Rayes BF, Droz Dit Busset M, et al.
Derazantinib (ARQ 087) in advanced or inoperable FGFR2 gene fusion-positive
intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2019;120:165-171.
2. McSheehy
P, Bachmann F, Forster-Gross N, et al. Derazantinib (DZB): A dual
FGFR/CSF1R-inhibitor active in PDX-models of urothelial cancer. Mol Cancer Ther.
2019;18:LB-C12.
3. Hall
TG, Yu Y, Eathiraj S, et al. Preclinical Activity of ARQ 087, a Novel Inhibitor
Targeting FGFR Dysregulation. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0162594.
4. Wood
JM, Bold G, Buchdunger E, et al. PTK787/ZK 222584, a novel and potent inhibitor
of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases, impairs
vascular endothelial growth factor-induced responses and tumor growth after
oral administration. Cancer Res. 2000;60:2178-2189.
5. Robinson
SP, Boult JKR, Vasudev NS, Reynolds AR. Monitoring the vascular response and resistance to sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma in vivo with susceptibility contrast MRI. Cancer Res. 2017;77:4127-4134.
6. Burrell
JS, Bradley RS, Walker-Samuel S, et al. MRI measurements of vessel calibre in
tumour xenografts: comparison with vascular corrosion casting. Microvasc Res. 2012;84:323-329.