0899

Nonlinear projection imaging with the Bloch-Siegert shift in an inhomogeneous B0 at low-field
Kartiga Selvaganesan1, Yonghyun Ha2, Basong Wu2, Kasey Hancock3, Charles Rogers III2, Sajad Hosseinnezhadian2, Gigi Galiana2, and Todd Constable2
1Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States, 2Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States, 3Electrical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States

Synopsis

The ability to form an image without using spatial encoding gradients allows for cheaper MRI manufacturing costs, particularly in small low field devices suitable for point-of-care imaging. The Bloch-Siegert shift effect provides an RF alternative to spatial encoding with gradient coils. This work presents a new approach to evaluate and optimize nonlinear RF encoding schemes generated by transmit phased arrays. From thousands of possible encoding patterns, the algorithm finds the set that minimizes correlations between spatial patterns while maximizing the spatial encoding. Simulated images demonstrate that the nonlinear spatial encodings provided by Bloch-Siegert RF pulses can provide high image quality.

Introduction

Recently, there has been a renewed interest in low-field MRI with the aim of building low cost systems to increase accessibility.1,2 The cost and complexity of MRI systems can be reduced by eliminating B0-gradient coils.3 To this end, we have developed a novel, low-field, open (Table-top) MRI system (Figure 1A) that allows for gradient-free imaging in a nonuniform B0-field at 24mT. The low-field readout yields T2s long enough to obtain up to 800 echoes in 1 second (Figure 1B). This provides significant flexibility in designing RF encoding patterns that maximize scan efficiency. In the proposed system, we independently control the amplitude and phase of the RF transmit pulse to each element in a 3x3 planar array, to define encoding patterns analogous to that of nonlinear projections. Considering combinations that only apply RF pulses to 8 channels with amplitudes of 0 or 100%, and phase 0 or π leads to 2304 possible patterns, making it challenging to choose an appropriate subset for image encoding. Here we propose a metric for ranking and assembling a set of encodings with minimal correlation. Images simulated with this encoding set demonstrate the feasibility of performing Bloch-Siegert shift4 spatial encoding with typical nonlinear RF coil profiles.

Methods

Slice selection: The B0-field of the Table-top system is generated by an electromagnet that can be dynamically controlled to achieve nonplanar slice selection. A single nonplanar slice containing uniform magnetic field strength (1MHz), that was on average 5cm from the bottom of the flat plane of the magnet was used in our 2D simulations.

Encoding scheme calculation: A 3x3 planar RF array coil was designed for Bloch-Siegert shift based encoding (Figure 2A). The B1-field generated by each coil element ($$$B1_c$$$) was computed using the “Biot-Savart magnetic Toolbox” in MATLAB.5 Figure 2B shows the B1-field of a coil element across the slice-profile used in our simulations. Using these B1-fields, encoding patterns were calculated according to the following equation:
$$B_1=\sum_1^nB1_c*A$$ where $$$n$$$ is the total number of transmit channels, and $$$A$$$ is a vector defining the amplitude and phase of the current passed to each channel.

Data analysis and optimization: Bloch simulations were used to compute the phasors generated by each encoding pattern. The L2 norm of the unwrapped phasor in a 20cmx20cm area in the center of the FOV was used to quantify the total amount of encoding provided by each candidate phasor. After thresholding by L2 norm, an optimal set was built by recursively choosing the pattern that minimized β, a metric which reflects how much a pattern would increase the L2 norm of the overall correlation matrix (Figure 3). This was intended to choose a distinctive set of encodings, while minimizing redundancy in the acquired encodings.

Image reconstruction: We performed algebraic reconstruction of the MR signal generated by the encoding patterns using the conjugate gradient method for nonlinear encoding fields.6 The measured MR signal was calculated as:
$$s_n (τ)= ∫p(r)*C_n (r)*e^{i*ϕ_{BS}(r,τ) } dr$$ where $$$C_n (r)$$$ is the complex coil sensitivity profile, $$$p(r)$$$ is the phantom image, and $$$ϕ_{BS}$$$ is the phase distribution of the encoding pattern.

Results

For the Bloch simulation experiments we used a spin-echo sequence with TE=16ms, T1=3000ms, T2=250ms, sampling rate of 0.023ms, and matrix size 128x128 voxels. The Bloch-Siegert transmit pulse was applied for 6ms (Figure 4A). As seen in Figure 4B-D, changing the phase offset or the amplitude of the applied Bloch-Siegert RF pulse creates distinct phase maps, with varying amounts of phase windings. We can also change the spatial shape of these patterns by selecting different subsets of coils for Bloch-Siegert transmission. These different patterns assign a signature phase evolution to each voxel in the image, that can then be recovered using our nonlinear reconstruction technique. 128 of the 2304 encoding patterns were selected (analogous to 128 projections), using the method described in the previous section, for image reconstruction. Figure 5 shows the reconstructed images of a high resolution brain scan.

Discussion

We have demonstrated the feasibility of performing nonlinear Bloch-Siegert shift based imaging on our low-field Table top MRI scanner, through simulation experiments. The overall image quality of the reconstructed images is excellent, with minimal blurring at the peripheries. The lower resolution at the edges is due to the fact that the encoding patterns were optimized for a region in the center of the FOV, and as such the phase winds more slowly outside this region. We can address this issue by either selecting encoding patterns that have been optimized for the entire FOV, or by increasing the amplitude of the applied Bloch-Siegert transmit pulse.

The simulation algorithm developed in this study allows us to robustly assess various encoding patterns, build optimal encoding schemes, and reconstruct MR images. This provides us with the freedom to generate and evaluate encoding patterns from any RF array coil. We are currently extending this to evaluate encoding patterns created from transmitting on different numbers of coils (3, 4, or 5 coils etc.), as well as expanding the range of phase offsets between coil elements.

Conclusion

In this study we have shown that Bloch-Siegert shift based nonlinear spatial encoding can be used to perform low-field MR imaging in a nonuniform B0-field.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. Wald, L. L. Portable MR Technology, <https://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/lab/mr-pig/research/portable-mr-technology> (2020).

2. Rothberg, J. Hyperfine. (2020).

3. Sharp, J. C. & King, S. B. MRI using radiofrequency magnetic field phase gradients. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 63, 151-161, doi:10.1002/mrm.22188 (2010).

4. Kartäusch, R. et al. Spatial phase encoding exploiting the Bloch–Siegert shift effect. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine 27, 363-371, doi:10.1007/s10334-013-0417-0 (2014).

5. L.Queval. BSmag Toolbox User Manual (University of Applied Sciences Dusseldorf, Germany, 2015).

6. Li, S. et al. Algebraic reconstruction technique for parallel imaging reconstruction of undersampled radial data: application to cardiac cine. Magnetic resonance in medicine 73, 1643-1653, doi:10.1002/mrm.25265 (2015).

Figures

Figure 1. A) Current prototype of the Table-top scanner. B) Echo train signal acquired with the Table-top scanner, from a CPMG pulse sequence.

Figure 2. A) Schematic of the nine channel transmit and receive RF array, with coil dimensions labeled. B) B1-field of coil 5 (highlighted in purple), across the nonplanar slice used in the simulations. The slice was extracted from a region of uniform B0-field.

Figure 3. The correlation between pairs of phasors was calculated for the initial set of N phasors (1). The phasors with the smallest correlation was added to the "input optimal set" (2). The sum of correlations squared was calculated between the remaining $$$(N-i)$$$ phasors, and the phasors in the "input optimal set", for a total of $$$(N-i)$$$ β values. The phasor with the smallest $$$β$$$ value was then added to the "output optimal set" (3). The ”output optimal set” became the new input, and steps 2 and 3 were repeated until the final optimal set contained the desired number of phasors (4).

Figure 4. A) Pulse sequence used in the Bloch simulations to generate the different phasor patterns. A 6ms Bloch-Siegert pulse with different pulse amplitudes and phase offsets was applied to combinations of 8 transmit channels to generate different phase patterns. B-D show examples of phase patterns generated from transmitting on all coils, except for “coil 1". B) All transmit channel are in phase, C) the middle row of transmit channels is π out of phase, and D) is the same transmit pattern as C, but with a 40% increase in the Bloch-Siegert RF pulse amplitude.

Figure 5. Brain images reconstructed from the simulated phasor patterns. Image reconstruction was performed using 128 encoding patterns in a 128x128 matrix. The overall image resolution is improved by applying a higher Bloch-Siegert pulse amplitude (C vs. B).

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 29 (2021)
0899