Antoine Klauser1,2,3, Bernhard Strasser2,4, Wolfgang Bogner4, Lukas Hingerl4, Claudiu Schirda5, Bijaya Thapa2, Daniel Cahill6, Tracy Batchelor7, François Lazeyras1,3, and Ovidiu Andronesi2
1Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland, 2Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States, 3CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging, Geneva, Switzerland, 4High‐Field MR Center, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image‐guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 5Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States, 6Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States, 7Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
Synopsis
A
new encoding trajectory for magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging
was
developed
and implemented on a 7T human scanner. ECcentric Circle ENcoding
TRajectorIes for Compressed-sensing (ECCENTRIC) is a spatial-spectral
encoding strategy optimized for random
non-Cartesian
sparse
Fourier
domain sampling. Acceleration by undersampling ECCENTRIC prevents
coherent aliasing artefacts in the spatial response function.
ECCENTRIC allows
smaller
circles
to
avoid temporal interleaving
for large matrix size,
which is beneficial for spectral quality. Circle
trajectories need
limited gradient slewrate without rewinding deadtime, and
are
robust to timing imperfection and eddy-current delays.
Introduction
A
major drawback of MRSI is long acquisition times for 4D (k,t)
spatio-temporal space, resulting in critical need for high
acceleration strategies. This is particularly relevant for
high-resolution whole-brain MRSI where traditional acquisition
schemes require several hours. Acceleration can be performed by
parallel imaging such as SENSE and GRAPPA with uniform undersampling,
or by Compressed-Sensing (CS) with random undersampling, but these
techniques generally don’t allow acceleration factors (AF) above
101,2.
Spatial-spectral encoding (SSE) techniques enable higher AF of
10-1003,
but
current SSE trajectories
require temporal interleaves at ultra-high field to reach a broad
spectral bandwidth and high spatial resolution. However, temporal
interleaving creates spectral sidebands that reduce SNR and overlap
with
metabolite signals. Thus, it should be avoided3.
Circular waveforms are characterized by absence of deadtime for
repeated rewinding, and have constant and moderate gradient slewrate
not demanding for gradient hardware.
We
introduce ECCENTRIC, a novel SSE trajectory following a random
pattern of off-center circles weighted with a highly desired 1/|k|
density function particularly suitable for sparse undersampling
acceleration to prevent coherent aliasing artefacts. With this
approach the circle size can be chosen to prevent the use of temporal
interleaving independently of the spatial resolution.Methods:
ECCENTRIC Trajectory
The
3D k-space is divided into kx-ky
planes where off-center circles are
measured,
while kz
is encoded by Cartesian
phase-encoding. The number of eccentric circles necessary to achieve
full sampling of kx-ky
planes is derived from rosette trajectory that needs $$$n\pi$$$ circles with $$$n$$$ being
the matrix size.4 The number of circles of radius $$$r$$$ for full sampling
is given by $$$n\pi\frac{k_{xy}^{max}}{2r}$$$
with $$$k_{xy}^{max}$$$
the
largest in-plane k-space absolute value(FIG.1).
To achieve spherical 3D k-space coverage, $$$k_{xy}^{max}$$$
is
decreased along the 3rd
dimension following $$$k_{xy}^{max}=\frac{n}{2FoV}\sqrt{1-k_z/k_z^{max}}$$$.
A short constant-time gradient ramp is used to reach initial
off-center $$$k_{xy}$$$
position and velocity, which is applied simultaneously with the
excitation
rewinder and phase encoding (Fig.1). Circle center positions,
parametrized by polar coordinates $$$(r_c,\phi_c)$$$
(FIG.1),
are chosen randomly and differently for each plane with $$$r_c$$$
in
$$$[0,max(k_{xy}^{max}-r,r)]$$$
and $$$\phi_c$$$
in
$$$[0,2\pi]$$$. The homogeneous distribution in polar coordinates
results in $$$1/|k|$$$ weighting in the Cartesian
k-space.
Spatial
response function5
(SRF)
was computed on a 64x64 matrix
using a NUFFT reconstruction6
for ECCENTRIC, rosette and concentric circle trajectories.
Sequence and
acquisition parameters
The
ECCENTRIC
was implemented on a 7T scanner (Terra/Siemens/Erlangen/Germany)
with a NOVA head coil (32Rx/8Tx)
and appended to a FID-MRSI sequence7
with 0.9ms echo-time (TE), 35° excitation flip-angle, 450ms
repetition-time (TR) and WET water suppression. The Field-of-View
(FoV) was set to (A/P-R/L-H/F)
220x220x45mm3
with 35mm-thick excited slab. The spatial resolution was 64x64x9
resulting in 3.4x3.4x5mm3
voxels. The ECCENTRIC circle radius was set to $$$r=\frac{64}{2FoV}$$$ (half
the rosette circle radius), the spectral bandwidth set to 2326Hz
didn’t require temporal interleaving, and the FID was sampled for
350ms. The resulting acquisition time of fully sampled data was 8min.
Reconstruction and
metabolite quantification
The
non-Cartesian MRSI signal was reconstructed using
the Total-Generalized-Variation (TGV) constrained low-rank
model9,10,11
allowing for reconstruction of randomly undersampled k-space.
Assuming
that
the magnetization in image space $$$\rho(\mathbf{r},t)$$$,
can
be separated into several spatial and temporal components$$\rho(\mathbf{r},t)=\sum_{n=1}^{K}U_n(\mathbf{r})V_n(t),$$these
components are
retrieved by the minimization problem$$\arg\min_{\mathbf{U}\mathbf{V}}\left\|\mathbf{s}-\mathcal{FCB}\mathbf{U}\mathbf{V}\right\|^2_2+\lambda\sum_{n=1}^{K}\text{TGV}^2\{U_n\}$$with
$$$\mathbf{s}$$$ the measured data, $$$\mathcal{F}$$$ the encoding
operator,
$$$\mathcal{C}$$$
the coil sensitivity operator,
$$$\mathcal{B}$$$ the frequency
shift operator
and $$$\lambda$$$ the TGV regularization parameter.
The
reconstruction was preceded by skull-lipid
suppression by orthogonality8,10.
The reconstructed MRSI dataset was quantified using LCModel12.
Experimental tests
ECCENTRIC
FID-MRSI data were acquired on a high resolution structural-metabolic
phantom, two healthy volunteers and a brain tumor patient.
Acceleration performance was assessed by retrospective undersampling and compared to fully sampled data by peak-SNR
and SSIM of metabolic maps, and FWHM, CRLB, and SNR obtained
from LCModel.
Results
In
Fig.2, we show the incoherent aliasing in SRF of undersampled
ECCENTRIC and the SRF pattern is conserved for different AF. In
comparison, rosette and concentric circles tend to create more
coherent pattern when trajectories are undersampled, and their SRF
changes with AF. This indicates that ECCENTRIC is more suitable for
acceleration by compressed-sensing than these
trajectories. The high-resolution phantom illustrates the capability
to resolve structural features up to the acquired spatial
resolution of 3.4mm.
Reconstructed
metabolite maps from a healthy volunteer are shown in Fig.3. The
grey-white matter contrast particularly present in the Glx map
indicates the sensitivity of the method for the lower signal of
J-coupled
metabolites. Spectral quality doesn't decrease strongly with
acceleration.
In Fig.4, brain
tumor patient data are shown for Cho, tNAA and Cho/tNAA ratio maps.
The tumor is clearly visible for all AF, although for AF=3 some areas
of the healthy brain present more noise. Spectra
show similar metabolic profiles
for all AF, albeit a slight increase of noise. The apparent higher
noise in patient data is due to a
titanium plate
and screws after brain surgery, which downgrades B0
and B1
homogeneity.Discussion
We
presented a new trajectory: ECCENTRIC that enables the acquisition of
high-resolution MRSI without temporal interleaving and with random
sparse sampling of the Fourier domain for unrestricted axial brain
coverage, which has high potential for clinical applications. Work in
progress explores higher spatial resolution and larger brain slab
coverage with greater acceleration factors.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Strasser, B., Považan, M., Hangel, G., Hingerl, L., Chmelik, M.,
Gruber, S., … Bogner, W. (2017). Magnetic Resonance in Medicine,
78(2), 429–440.
[2] Nassirpour, S., Chang, P., Avdievitch, N., & Henning, A.
(2018). Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 80(6), 2311–2325.
[3] Bogner, W., Otazo, R., & Henning, A. (2020). NMR in
Biomedicine, e4314.
[4] Schirda, C. V., Tanase, C., & Boada,
F. E. (2009). Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 29(6),
1375–1385.
[5] Mareci, T. H., & Brooker, H. R. (1991).
Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969), 92(2), 229–246.
[6]
Fessler JA, Sutton BP. IEEE Trans Signal Process 2003;
51:560–574.
[7] Henning, A., Fuchs, A., Murdoch, J. B., &
Boesiger, P. (2009). NMR in Biomedicine, 22(7), 683–696.
[8]
Bilgic, B., Gagoski, B., Kok, T. and Adalsteinsson, E. (2013).
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 69, 1501-1511
[9] Kasten, J.,
Lazeyras, F., & Van De Ville, D. (2013). IEEE Transactions On
Medical Imaging, 32(10), 1853–1863.
[10] Klauser, A.,
Courvoisier, S., Kasten, J., Kocher, M., Guerquin-Kern, M., Van De
Ville, D., & Lazeyras, F. (2019). Magnetic Resonance in Medicine,
81(5), 2841–2857.
[11] Klauser, A., Courvoisier, S., Kocher,
M., Van De Ville, D., & Lazeyras, F. (2018). Whole Brain
5mm-isotropic 3D 1H-FID-MRSI accelerated with Compressed- Sensing
SENSE. ISMRM annual meeting proceeding #3847
[12] Provencher,
S.W. (1993). Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 30, 672-679.