Florence Fauvelle1,2, Vasile Stupar1,2, Jia Guo3, Wafae Labriji1, Chen Liu3, Alicia Plaindoux1, Emmanuel Luc Barbier1,2, Sophie Hamelin1, and Antoine Depaulis1
1Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, University Grenoble Alpes, La Tronche, France, 2IRMaGE, University Grenoble Alpes, La Tronche, France, 3Departement of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
Synopsis
New non invasive methods
are required to better delimit the epileptogenic zone (EZ) during the
pre-surgical exam of epileptic patients.
By combining ex vivo NMR spectroscopy-based (MRS)
untargeted metabolomics and in vivo MRS-based
targeted metabolomics, we found that GABA was the most discriminant metabolite of the epileptogenic zone vs adjacent brain regions in a
mouse model of mesio-temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE).
GABA appears therefore as
a specific in vivo biomarker of EZ in
MTLE.
INTRODUCTION
For the 30 % of drug-resistant
epileptic patients who mainly suffer from focal epilepsy, a surgical resection
of the epileptogenic zone (EZ) can be proposed with a mean efficiency of 50-801. A precise
identification of the EZ is mandatory for an effective resection. Despite a
large panel of noninvasive preoperative explorations, intracranial EEG (IEEG) is
often required2, but the low spatial
sampling of each electrode and/or misguided implantation may result in the
resection of an insufficient brain area. Therefore, the development of
non-invasive methods to better identify the EZ and to guide electrode
implantation remains a challenge.
In our study, we hypothesized that
MRS-based metabolomics could address this issue in mesio-temporal lobe epilepsy
(MTLE), the prototype of surgical epilepsy. We used KA-MTLE (kainate) mice, that
leads to hippocampal sclerosis similar to human ones3. Using pattern
recognition methods applied to ex vivo
MRS data, we determined the metabolic profile of the EZ relative to (i) Sham
and (ii) adjacent structures, and identified the metabolite that best
discriminate EZ. We then performed in
vivo MRS of this metabolite to evaluate its reliability as a biomarker for
the non-invasive detection of the EZ4.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals
KA-MTLE mice were obtained by injection into
the right dorsal hippocampus of 50 nL of KA while Sham received NaCl3. We
performed 7 experimental series. For one series, a half KA dose was used
instead of regular dose. Thirty days after injection,
we recorded hippocampal EEG activity to check for typical hippocampal
paroxysmal discharge (Fig 1A).
In vivo MRI
experiments
In vivo MRI and MRS were
performed on a 9.4 Tesla scanner
(BioSpec 94/20 Avance III HD, Bruker Biospin) with ParaVision (6.0.1) software
three weeks after KA injection. We
first acquired T2-weighted images to check for hippocampal sclerosis in
KA-MTLE mice (Fig 1B). Then we used a customized MEGA-PRESS5 method for GABA level measurements
into the injected hippocampus (2x1x2 mm3 voxel, 68 ms
echo time, 512 averages for On and OFF spectra each using interleaved mode,
34-min acquisition). We pre-processed and quantified the data using
the JET algorithm6, which requires no manual
adjustment. Creatine+phosphocreatine (CR), GABA+ (GABA
+ macromolecule), and glutamate+glutamine (GLX) were quantified. To
limit the effect of possible acquisition bias, we calculated the ratios
GABA+/GLX.
Ex vivo HRMAS MRS
One week after in vivo
MRS, we collected 5 samples/animal: ipsilateral and contralateral hippocampus (IH and CH), divided each in
posterior (P) and anterior (A), and adjacent cortex for 1H
HRMAS MRS. This
latter was performed on a Bruker Avance III spectrometer (IRMaGe, CEA,
Grenoble, France) at 500 MHz using a CPMG pulse sequence (echo time 30 ms). Quantification was
performed using the QUEST procedure of jMRUI7.
Statistical analysis
We applied multivariate
statistics using the SIMCA-P software v14 (Umetrics, Umea, Sweden), to find the metabolites most involved in EZ discrimination,
based on their VIP (variable importance in the projection) values8. We considered metabolites with VIP ≥ 1 as the
most relevant. RESULTS
For KA-MTLE mice with typical paroxysmal discharges
(Fig 1A) and associated hippocampal sclerosis (Fig 1B), the principal component
analysis (PCA) built with 1H HRMAS MRS data of tissue showed that EZ
had a specific metabolic profile, compared to sham animals and, more importantly,
compared to adjacent regions (Fig 2A).
14 metabolites were stronly dysregulated in EZ compared to Sham.
Classification of the metabolites according to their
discriminating power showed that GABA was the most discriminant metabolite of EZ
(Fig 2B), with a more than 100% increase compared to sham homologous brain area
(Fig 2C). Alanine and acetate were also increased by around 50%.
The MEGA-PRESS analysis of EZ
confirmed this large GABA increase, and the decrease of GLX (Fig 3A). The in
vivo and ex vivo data were largely consistent, as indicated by the
correlation curve (Fig 3B).DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION
By using an unbiased methodological strategy, we have
demonstrated that a drastic increase of GABA and the associated GABA/GLX ratio are
EZ-specific in a validated model of MTLE with focal seizure4.
While this result appears somewhat paradoxical
with the “GABA-deficiency theory” of epilepsy9, it is consistent with several studies in animal
model10 and in patients11, suggesting that GABA could contribute to
epileptogenesis and ictogenesis.
Our projects are now i) to develop chemical shift
imaging of GABA for animal and ii) to measure in vivo GABA levels
in EZ of patients with a suspicion of MTLE. For this latter, in vivo GABA
edition could be performed before surgery, followed by ex vivo MRS of
resected tissue.Acknowledgements
This study was supported
by INSERM funding and a grant from the French Foundation for Research on
Epilepsy (FFRE). The authors are grateful to Sylvain Andrieu and Laure Mehr for
their advice and their help in animal experimentation, to Pierre-Alain Bayle
and Michel Bardet for the use of HRMAS probehead in CEA, and to Pr Philippe Kahane for helpful
discussions. Grenoble MRI facility IRMaGe was
partly funded by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche: grant Infrastructure
d'avenir en Biologie Santé ANR-11-INBS-0006.References
1. Picot MC, Baldy-Moulinier M, Daures JP,
et al. The prevalence of epilepsy and pharmacoresistant epilepsy in adults: a
population-based study in a Western European country. Epilepsia. 2008
Jul;49(7):1230-8.
2. Jayakar
P, Gotman J, Harvey AS, et al. Diagnostic utility of invasive EEG for epilepsy
surgery: Indications, modalities, and techniques. Epilepsia. 2016
Nov;57(11):1735-47.
3. Riban
V, Bouilleret V, Pham-Le BT, et al. Evolution of hippocampal epileptic activity
during the development of hippocampal sclerosis in a mouse model of temporal
lobe epilepsy. Neuroscience. 2002;112(1):101-11.
4. Hamelin
S, Stupar V, Maziere L, et al. In vivo gamma-aminobutyric acid increase as a
biomarker of the epileptogenic zone: An unbiased metabolomics approach.
Epilepsia. 2020 Dec 1.
5. Mescher
M, Merkle H, Kirsch J, et al. Simultaneous in vivo spectral editing and water
suppression. NMR Biomed. 1998 Oct;11(6):266-72.
6. Guo
J, Gang Z, Sun Y, et al. In vivo detection and automatic analysis of GABA in
the mouse brain with MEGA-PRESS at 9.4 T. NMR Biomed. 2018 ;31(1).
7. Ratiney
H, Sdika M, Coenradie Y, et al. Time-domain semi-parametric estimation based on
a metabolite basis set. NMR Biomed. 2005 ;18(1):1-13.
8. Galindo-Prieto
B, Eriksson K, Trygg J. Variable influence on projection (VIP) for orthogonal
projections to latent structures (OPLS). J Chemometrics. 2014 ;28(8):623-32.
9. Meldrum
BS. GABAergic mechanisms in the pathogenesis and treatment of epilepsy. Br J
Clin Pharmacol. 1989;27 Suppl 1:3S-11S.
10. Stamboulian-Platel
S, Legendre A, Chabrol T, et al. Activation of GABAA receptors controls
mesiotemporal lobe epilepsy despite changes in chloride transporters
expression: In vivo and in silico approach. Exp Neurol. 2016 ;284(Pt A):11-28.
11. Cohen
I, Navarro V, Clemenceau S, et al. On the origin of interictal activity in
human temporal lobe epilepsy in vitro. Science. 2002 15;298(5597):1418-21.