Carlos Bilreiro1,2, Francisca F Fernandes1, Rui V Simões1, Mireia Castillo-Martin1,3, Andrada Ianus1, Cristina Chavarrias1, Celso Matos1,2, and Noam Shemesh1
1Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal, 2Department of Radiology, Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Lisbon, Portugal, 3Department of Pathology, Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Lisbon, Portugal
Synopsis
As current therapeutic
options for pancreatic cancer are mostly ineffective, developing diagnostic
tools for early detection of precursor lesions (mainly pancreatic
intraepithelial neoplasia – PanIN) could change the course of this disease.
Here, we investigated Diffusion-MRI (dMRI) contrasts for this purpose, using transgenic mouse models. First, we performed ex vivo dMRI
Microscopy at ultrahigh field with histological validation, defining the most
sensitive contrasts. Then, we performed in vivo abdominal imaging,
demonstrating their applicability in the non-invasive study of PanIN and
pancreatic cancer. These findings provide new tools for researching PanIN and hold
promise for a future translation to clinical practice.
Introduction
Pancreatic cancer,
mainly represented by ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), is a leading cause of
cancer related-death worldwide, with a 9% survival rate at 5 years, due to late
diagnosis and limited efficacy of therapeutic options1-3. Therefore,
identifying precursor lesions for PDAC, mainly comprised of pancreatic
intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN), could provide opportunities for earlier and more
effective therapies. However, PanINs are not diagnosed by current non-invasive
imaging4, which also hinders research on the lesions’ biology and PDAC
tumorigenesis.
Here, we developed a Diffusion-encoded
Susceptibility Perturbation Imaging (DESPI)5 approach for detecting
PanIN in Pdx1-Cre;KrasG12D and Ptf1a-Cre;KrasG12D;TP53 mice (well-established
models for the development of PanIN and PDAC6), validating our
findings with histology. Following previous work7, we first
performed ex vivo analyses, for a comprehensive exploration of different
contrasts with MR-Microscopy. We than adapted the methodology for in vivo conditions
and performed abdominal imaging with diffusion contrast for identifying PanIN
associated changes and PDAC.Methods
Experiments were
preapproved by institutional and national authorities, in accordance with
European Directive 2010/63. Datasets were analyzed using MATLAB™ (MathWorks
Inc., Natick, MA) and ImageJ (US NIH).
In vivo anatomical MRI and Tissue
extraction
N=6 Pdx1-Cre;KrasG12D
mice (C57BL/6J background) underwent abdominal imaging once every 3 weeks
from 14-weeks-old, on 1T and 9.4T scanners (IconTM, BioSpecTM,
Bruker, Germany) with TSE-T2WI (IconTM: TR/TE = 3825/60ms; RARE-factor = 8; slice
thickness = 700µm; resolution = 150x150µm2; BiospecTM: TR/TE = 750/8ms; RARE-factor = 8; slice thickness = 700µm; resolution = 125x125µm2). All animals showed
pancreatic abnormalities at 9-months-old (Figure 1) and were sacrificed for post-mortem
analyses, along with a similar-aged C57BL/6J control. Pancreases were removed
by laparotomy, immersed in 4%-PFA (48 hours), PBS (24 hours) and Flourinert®
within a 10mm NMR tube.
Ex vivo MR-Microscopy
Pancreases were imaged with
a 10 mm CryoprobeTM in a 16.4T scanner (Ascend AeonTM,
Bruker, Germany). DESPI provided ultrahigh resolution 3D images with both
diffusion and T2* contrast (TR/TE = 125/9.2ms; echoes = 4; resolution = (80µm)3; b values = 0 and 775s/mm2; δ= 2ms; Δ = 7ms; 10 diffusion directions).
Histology
Paraffin blocks of the imaged
pancreases were sliced with 0.5mm intervals and 5µm thick sections and stained with
Hematoxylin and Eosin. Slides were digitalized (Ultra-Fast Scanner™, Philips),
evaluated by a gastrointestinal pathologist (18 years of experience) and manually
co-registered with MRI by a gastrointestinal radiologist (7 years of experience).
In vivo dMRI
Abdominal MRI was
performed in 10-15 weeks-old N=6 Ptf1a-Cre;KrasG12D-TP53 mice (C57BL/6J
background) and a healthy 15-weeks-old control, in a 9.4T scanner (BioSpecTM,
Bruker, Germany). Hyoscine butylbromide was used for reducing bowel motion
(5mg/kg)8. High-resolution DWI-EPI was acquired (TR/TE = 2300/15.6ms;
slice thickness = 250µm; resolution = 125x125µm2; 12 diffusion directions; b values = 0 and 1000s/mm2; δ = 3.3ms;
Δ = 6ms). Results
The ex vivo control
pancreas presented homogeneous contrast, without any abnormalities (Figure 2).
In contrast, transgenic pancreases evidenced multiple nodules with variable
size, corresponding to PanINs in a background of acinar-ductal metaplasia (ADM)
(Figure 3). Inflammatory infiltrates were also observed, representing acute and
chronic pancreatitis.
DESPI defined both PanIN and inflammatory infiltrates with
high signal intensity in the b=0s/mm2 images, most conspicuous in
the 4th echo. Diffusion weighting enabled a clear distinction
between PanIN (high signal intensity) and inflammation (low signal intensity).
DTI analysis revealed high Fractional anisotropy (FA) at the PanIN periphery, providing
even greater contrast with adjacent tissue. PDAC was also detected, producing
similar diffusion contrasts to PanIN (Figure 4).
In the in vivo
experiments, large lesions were identified in the transgenic pancreases,
compatible with PDAC, contrasting with the homogenous pancreas of the control
mouse (Figure 5). Similarly to ex vivo findings, these lesions presented
high signal intensity in DWI and high anisotropy values. These contrasts could
also be observed in much smaller lesions, and diffusely in the pancreatic
parenchyma, probably reflecting PanIN in ADM background. Histological
validation for these findings is underway.Discussion
Our results show that
PanIN and PDAC can be characterized by dMRI. These contrasts showed high
sensitivity for the lesions in ex vivo experiments, and were replicated in
vivo.
The DESPI contrasts in
PanIN and PDAC, especially noticeable ex vivo with mixed T2* contrast
and longer echo times, could be explained by high cellularity and fibrotic
tissue (restricting diffusion) and increased cellular volumes with
intracellular accumulation of mucin (increasing T2* values)5,9. The
high FA values in the lesion periphery, correlating with regions with high
fibrotic content, could be attributed to a mostly organized deposition of
fibrosis in these areas10.
Distinguishing tumoral
lesions from inflammation non-invasively has been challenging in clinical
practice11, and these contrasts could also provide specific
biomarkers for this purpose.
The abdominal MRI
experiments revealed that the application of DWI and DTI for characterizing
PanIN and PDAC in vivo is feasible. These represent new tools to
characterize PanIN and PDAC in transgenic animals, allowing researchers to non-invasively
study the tumors’ biology and holding promise for a future translation to
clinical practice.Conclusion
PanIN and PDAC can be characterized
in the mouse pancreas with dMRI, both ex vivo and in vivo with excellent
contrast, allowing the detection of these lesions and distinction from inflammation.
Further development of these findings may establish early biomarkers in
pancreatic cancer. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge:
Dr. Kevin Harkins and Prof. Mark
Does (Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, USA), for developing
DESPI (https://github.com/remmi-toolbox/remmi-matlab, NIH EB019980);
The Vivarium from Champalimaud
Foundation (CONGENTO, Lisboa-01-0145-FEDER-022170);
The Histopathology Platform from Champalimaud Foundation;
Funding: Champalimaud
Research and H2020-MSCA-IF-2018, ref:844776.
References
1 - Siegel RL, Miller
KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 2020;70:7-30.
2 - European Commission.
(2018). European Cancer Information System. Available:
https://ecis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/explorer.php?$1-AE28$2-All$4-1,2$3-All$6-0,14$5-2008,2008$7-7$0-0$CEstByCancer$X0_8-3$CEstRelativeCanc$X1_8-3$X1_9-AE28.
Last accessed November 18, 2020.
3 - Sohn TA, Yeo CJ,
Cameron JL, et al. Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas-616 patients:
results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg
2000;4:567–579.
4 - Vullierme M-P,
Menassa L, Couvelard A, et al. Non-branched microcysts of the pancreas on MR
imaging of patients with pancreatic tumors who had pancreatectomy may predict
the presence of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN): a preliminary
study. Eur Radiol 2019;29:5731-5741.
5 - Santiago I, Santinha J, Ianus A, et al. Susceptibility Perturbation MRI Maps Tumor
Infiltration into Mesorectal Lymph Nodes. Cancer Res 2019;79:2435-2444.
6 - Colvin EK, Scarlett
CJ. A historical perspective of pancreatic cancer mouse models. Semin Cell Dev
Biol 2014;27:96-105.
7 – Bilreiro C, Simões R, Fernandes F, et al. Identification of pancreatic intraepithelial
neoplasia in the mouse pancreas with MR Microscopy. ISMRM 2020 Virtual Meeting, Communication number 0133.
8 - Bilreiro C, Fernandes F, Andrade L, et al. Hyoscine butylbromide for bowel motion
reduction in mouse abdominal MRI. 2020 (Preprint), arXiv:2007.04282.
9 - Kartalis N, Lindholm
TL, Aspelin P, Permert J, Albiin N. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance
imaging of pancreas tumours. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:1981-1990.
10 - Ianuş A, Santiago I, Galzerano A, et al. Higher-order diffusion MRI characterization of
mesorectal lymph nodes in rectal cancer. Magn Reson Med 2020;84:348-364.
11 - Barral M, Taouli B,
Guiu B, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the pancreas: Current status
and recommendations. Radiology. 2015;274:45-63.