Dongyue Si1, Shuo Chen1, Daniel A. Herzka2, and Haiyan Ding1
1Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 2National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
Synopsis
Three-dimensional
(3D) T2 mapping techniques enables quantitative detection of
edematous tissue with whole heart coverage. However, the intrinsically long scan
time limits its clinical application. In this study an accelerated 3D T2
mapping sequence was developed based on low-rank plus sparsity reconstruction.
Both retrospective and prospective experiments were performed to evaluate the accuracy
and precision of the proposed method. Achieved image quality was comparable with
4 times acceleration. Homogeneous whole left ventricular T2 map can
be acquired in single breath-hold with resolution of 2×2×5 mm3.
INTRODUCTION
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance T2
mapping enables quantification and visualization of changes in myocardial tissue(1).
In addition, three-dimensional (3D) approaches,(2) remove
limitations on volumetric coverage, maximum undersampling rate,(3)
and achievable spatial resolution that can exist with two-dimensional approaches,(4).
Nevertheless, the long scan time required for collection of different T2-weighted
3D volumes can hinder the translation into clinical workflows. To reduce the
scan time of 3D acquisitions while overcoming limitations of 2D approaches, we propose
a fast single Breath-Holding 3D T2 mapping sequence (BH3DT2)
with low-rank plus sparsity reconstruction.METHODS
Imaging was performed on 3 T MR scanners (Ingenia CX,
Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands). The human study was approved by the
local institutional review board. Written informed consent was obtained from
all subjects.
Sequence:
The proposed BH3DT2 is based on our previously proposed free-breathing 3D T2
mapping sequence (FB3DT2), which acquires three interleaved ECG-triggered spoiled
gradient echo volumes using T2 preparation (T2-prep) with
different echo time (TET2Prep) under free breathing. A saturation
pulse followed constant delay time is performed before acquisition each
heartbeat to reset magnetization. Each volume was completed in 4 shots with a variable
density spiral‐like Cartesian trajectory (5).
Acquisition was completed within a single breath-holding of 12 heartbeats.
L+S Reconstruction: The T2-weighted volumes can be represented by a Casorati
matrix $$$L$$$ (6), with size $$$N×P$$$, where $$$N$$$ is the total
number of voxels in 3D volume and $$$P$$$ is the number
of distinct T2-weighted volumes. The images share the same spatial
structure, which can be represented as a low-rank matrix $$$L$$$, the residual matrix ($$$S$$$) between $$$X$$$ and $$$L$$$ is the result
from the signal change of T2 weighting contrast, which is assumed to
be sparse. The imaging reconstruction was performed by solving the minimization
problem: $$min‖L‖_*+ λ‖TS‖_1 \ \ \ \ \ \ s.t.\ X=L+S,E(X)=d$$ where
$$$‖L‖_*$$$ is the
nuclear norm of the low-rank matrix $$$L$$$ , $$$T$$$ is the
Fourier transform applied to $$$S$$$ to
increase sparsity, and $$$‖TS‖_1$$$ is the l1-norm. $$$λ$$$ is a
parameter that balances the l1-norm and the nuclear norm. $$$E$$$ is the
multicoil encoding operator, and $$$d$$$ is the
undersampled multi-contrast multi-coil K-space data. The minimization problem
was solved by iterative soft thresholding (7).
Retrospective Validation: Using data from one
normal human subject and one swine with acute myocardial infarction, we investigate
the optimal acceleration rate for BH3DT2 by retrospectively
undersampling fully-sampled reference (Ref) data with three acceleration factors
(R= 2,4,6). Reference data were acquired by FB3DT2 using the same signal preparation
as BH3DT2 albeit with respiratory navigation. Imaging parameters of FB3DT2: FOV=300×300×80
mm3, voxel size=2×2×10 mm3, reconstructed resolution:
2×2×5 mm3, TET2Prep= 0, 25, 45 ms. Coil sensitivity map
was estimated by sum of square. The normalized root-mean-square errors (nRMSE)
were calculated to optimize the L+S reconstruction parameters, and to compare
the performance.
Prospective
Validation: Four normal human subjects (3 males, 28±7
years) were imaged with BH3DT2 and FB3DT2 in short axis orientation. Imaging parameters
were: FOV=300×300×80mm3,
voxel size=2×2×10mm3, TR/TE/ flip angle = 3.7ms/1.19ms/18°, 50
readouts per shot, acceleration factor R=4.48, TET2Prep=0, 25, 45 ms.
Coil sensitivity map was estimated by ESPIRiT (8).
FB3DT2 was performed without acceleration.
The left ventricle was
manually segmented on T2 maps and divided into 16 segments. The
mean, standard deviation (SD), and coefficient of variation (CV) of T2
within each segment were calculated. A paired two-tailed Student's t-test
was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS
Comparison results of the performance of L+S at
different undersampling rates (R=2,4,6) are shown in Figures 1-3. With retrospective undersampling in both the normal human
subject (Figure 1) and the swine with acute myocardial infarction (Figure
2), nRMSE increased with R. Image artefacts were subtle at R=4 though
significantly increased in both T2-weighted images and T2 maps
at R=6. Figure 3 indicates that there were little bias
in mean T2, and an increase
in CV after undersampling.
All subjects were scanned
successfully with BH3DT2 (~12 seconds) and FB3DT2 (116±15 seconds) during
prospective validation. Figure 4
shows T2 measured with BH3DT2 was homogeneous over the whole
heart, as demonstrated by the analysis in Figures
4B, 4C and 4D. Figure 5 shows the
mean T2 obtained from all four subjects over the whole left
ventricle. The mean T2 from BH3DT2 (47.2±1.2 ms) was only 1.5%
higher than that from FB3DT2 (46.5±1.5 ms, p=0.03) with comparable variability (CV: 8.36±1.9% vs. 7.89±2.0%,
p=0.02). DISCUSSION and CONCLUSION
This
study proposed and validated a 3D cardiac T2 mapping sequence. In-vivo
validations indicated that T2 from breath-hold acquisitions (BH3DT2)
had comparable accuracy to that from fully sampled data acquired during
free-breathing (FB3DT2), with little impact on precision at high acceleration
rates. In conclusion, the proposed sequence enables a fast estimate of T2
across the whole heart within a single breath-hold. Further validation with
additional subjects, and optimization of parameters for both acquisition and
reconstruction are warranted.Acknowledgements
This work was funded by National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0104700)References
1. Messroghli DR, Moon JC, Ferreira VM,
et al. Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping
of T1, T2, T2* and extracellular volume: A consensus statement by the Society
for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European
Association for Cardiovascular Imagi. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2017;19:75
2. Ding H, Fernandez-de-Manuel L, Schär
M, et al. Three-dimensional whole-heart T 2 mapping at 3T. Magn. Reson. Med.
2015;74:803–816
3. Robson PM, Grant AK, Madhuranthakam
AJ, Lattanzi R, Sodickson DK, McKenzie CA. Comprehensive quantification of
signal-to-noise ratio and g-factor for image-based and k-space-based parallel
imaging reconstructions. Magn. Reson. Med. 2008;60:895–907
4. Giri S, Chung Y-C, Merchant A, et al.
T2 quantification for improved detection of myocardial edema. J. Cardiovasc.
Magn. Reson. 2009;11:56
5. Bustin A, Ginami G, Cruz G, et al.
Five-minute whole-heart coronary MRA with sub-millimeter isotropic resolution,
100% respiratory scan efficiency, and 3D-PROST reconstruction. Magn. Reson.
Med. 2019;81:102–115
6. Zhao B, Lu W, Hitchens TK, Lam F, Ho
C, Liang Z-P. Accelerated MR parameter mapping with low-rank and sparsity constraints.
Magn. Reson. Med. 2015;74:489–498
7. Otazo R, Candès E, Sodickson DK.
Low-rank plus sparse matrix decomposition for accelerated dynamic MRI with
separation of background and dynamic components. Magn. Reson. Med. 2015;73:1125–1136
8. Uecker M, Lai P, Murphy MJ, et al.
ESPIRiT-an eigenvalue approach to autocalibrating parallel MRI: Where SENSE
meets GRAPPA. Magn. Reson. Med. 2014;71:990–1001