Martin Dawson Holland1, Andres Morales1, Sean Simmons2, Brandon Smith1, Samuel R Misko1, Roy P Koomullil1, Junzhong Xu3, David A Hormuth, II4, Junzhong Xu3, Thomas E Yankeelov4, and Harrison Kim1
1University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States, 2Objective Design, Birmingham, AL, United States, 3Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States, 4University of Texas, Austin, TX, United States
Synopsis
A new point-of-care portable perfusion phantom was
developed to reduce inter- and intra-scanner variability of quantitative
dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). This device is disposable, easily operable,
and conveniently deliverable for widespread, routine clinical use. As this device has high repeatability
(intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.997), it can be utilized to improve the
accuracy of quantitative DCE-MRI based analysis of many diseases including cancer.
Purpose: Dynamic contrast-enhanced
magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is used to assess tissue
perfusion/permeability by measuring the temporal variation of contrast-agent
concentration in the tissue. However,
the inter- and intra-scanner variability of quantitative DCE-MRI measurement remains
a concern. We previously developed a point-of-care
portable perfusion phantom (P4) that was small enough to be simultaneously imaged
with a human subject, and thus can serve as a real-time calibration tool. The P4-based error correction was able to
reduce the inter-scanner variation of quantitative DCE-MRI measurement approximately
five-fold and the intra-scanner variation approximately four-fold.1,2 The goal of this study was to upgrade the design of the P4 phantom to be
disposable, easily operable, and conveniently deliverable for widespread,
routine clinical use.
Methods: Our
new disposable P4 phantom (see Fig. 1) is composed of top and bottom chambers
with a semi-permeable membrane (pore size: 12~14 kDa) placed between them. The top chamber measures 1 × 15 × 150 mm (height × width × length), and the
bottom chamber measures 15 × 15
× 150 mm. The top half has a ridge
that protrudes along the perimeter of the top chamber, while the bottom half
has a channel around it to accept the ridge. The membrane is placed such that the ridge and
channel enclose it when the two halves are combined, clamping it into place and
maintaining flatness. Both
top and bottom chambers of the P4 phantom are filled with degassed/deionized
water. To prevent water
leakage that creates bubbles that cause variation in phantom performance, epoxy is used as a gasket
between the two halves to prevent water leakage. The inlet and outlets
of the phantom are closed with caps. Before use, the caps are
removed, and a tube filled with an MR contrast agent is connected to the inlet. A computational fluid-dynamics
(CFD) model was employed to optimize the top chamber geometry such that over
99% of the water would be displaced by the contrast agent infused into the top
chamber. The CFD model was validated
with samples collected from the top chamber using Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry
(LC-MS). LC-MS also was utilized to
measure the contrast enhancement curve (CEC) of the phantom. Two holes were drilled in the side of the
bottom chamber and a 0.25 ml sample was extracted every minute for ten minutes
after infusing 4 ml of gadoteridol (100 mM) at a constant rate (0.24 ml/s) into
the top chamber. This process was
repeated ten times for a total of 100 samples. The repeatability of the CEC was evaluated using
DCE-MRI with five P4 phantoms located at the center of a single 3T MRI scanner
(SIEMENS Prisma). A new phantom package (see
Fig. 2) was designed to house up to three phantoms. The cassette was connected to a
position-finder via a polymer and carbon-fiber cable system allowing an
operator to adjust the cassette’s position by ±7.5 cm. A new patient bed (see Fig. 3) was made with
wooden platforms (height
× width × length = 6 × 48 × 206 cm, weight = 6 kg).
The bed
structure was configured using finite element analysis to support up to 136 kg
of body weight when the subject sits on the bed. Using the
cable controller indicated with an arrow at the end of the bed, the phantom’s
location can be adjusted without interfering a human subject inside an MRI
scanner.
Results: No bubble
formation was observed in epoxy-sealed phantoms for at least four
months. A CFD model of the top chamber geometry produced
post-infusion gadoteridol purity of 99.2%, when 4 ml of gadoteridol is infused at
a rate of 0.24 ml/s over 16.67 seconds. Figure
4 shows the CEC of the P4 phantom measured with LC-MS, confirming a linear increase
(0.17 mM/min) of contrast-agent concentration in the phantom with 96% accuracy.
Figure 5 shows the repeatability of the P4
phantom. Figure 5A shows the
contrast agent concentration (CAC) maps of five phantoms (P1-P5) at 2, 3, and 5
minutes after the imaging
initiation. Figure 5B shows the CECs of the phantoms.
The intraclass correlation coefficient of the CECs was 0.997.
Discussion: We developed a new disposable P4
phantom and accompanying equipment for accurate quantitative DCE-MRI measurement
in the routine clinical setting. The
data consistency across different scanners and acquisition times will facilitate
multi-institutional studies for drug development as well as improving diagnosis
and prognosis accuracy of many diseases including cancer. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Kim
H., Mousa M., Schexnailder P., Hergenrother R., Bolding M., Ntsikoussalabongui
B., Thomas V., Morgan, D. E., “Portable perfusion phantom for quantitative
DCE‐MRI of the abdomen,” Medical Physics,
44: 5198-5209, 2017.
2.
2. Kim H., Thomas J. V., Nix J. W.,
Gordetsky J. B., Li Y., Rais-Bahrami S., “Portable Perfusion Phantom Offers
Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Accurate
Prostate Cancer Grade Stratification: A Pilot Study,” Academic Radiology, 2020 [Epub ahead of print].