Michael Bernier1,2, Jingyuan E Chen1,2, Olivia Viessmann1,2, Nina E Fultz1,3, Maxime Chamberland4, Rebecca K Leaf5, Lawrence L Wald1,2,6, and Jonathan R Polimeni1,2,6
1Department of Radiology, A. A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States, 2Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States, 3Department of Engineering, University of Boston, Boston, MA, United States, 4Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff, United Kingdom, 5Division of Hematology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States, 6Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA, United States
Synopsis
Blood vessels
influence nearby fMRI signals, and patterns of vascular anatomy partly shape
the patterns of the BOLD response. To better understand the relationship
between large-scale brain networks and vascular anatomy, here we developed an approach
for estimating the topology of the vascular network and quantifying how vessel
pathways connect between brain regions. We used a blood-pool contrast agent to
enhance the vessels, and developed a new method for vessel tracking similar to
what is conventionally used to estimate structural connectivity in diffusion
MRI. We demonstrate an application this framework by estimating vascular
connectivity matrices for the human brain.
Introduction
It is well known
that blood vessels influence proximal fMRI signals, and that vascular geometry
and topology—in part—shape the patterns of the BOLD response [1], [2]. For example, previous studies have shown
that estimates of resting-state connectivity are strongly affected by large cerebral blood vessel [3]. While there is extensive evidence that
the large-scale networks observed in fMRI reflect large-scale patterns of
neural activity [4]–[6], the extent to which these patterns may mirror
the topology of brain angioarchitecture is unknown, requiring a more
detailed knowledge of vascular anatomy. Consequently, we sought to characterize the human brain vasculature by estimating the topology and connection
density of the vascular network. This was motivated by the observations that hemodynamic
signals appear to track the vascular anatomy [7], and therefore some components of observed
functional connectivity patterns may be mediated by distant vascular pathways. Investigating this first requires
a robust vessel detection and segmentation, which we addressed by employing the blood-pool contrast agent Ferumoxytol [8] and established the tools to segment mesoscale vasculature across the entire brain [9]. Here, we take the next step of subsequently investigate the vessels pathways by developing a new method for vessel tracking, akin to established methods for structural
connectivity estimates with diffusion-weighted MR data. While previous studies
have employed intensity-based tensor methods for tracking vessels [10], [11], our new approach was developed to
handle the smaller vessels detected and to address spurious small disconnections.
We finally applied this framework to estimate vascular connectivity matrices for the
human brain. Methods
Four anemic but
neurologically healthy (44±7 y.o., 3F) volunteers participated after
providing written informed consent. Each volunteer was scanned at 3T (TimTrio,
Siemens Healthineers), after injection with 510mg of Ferumoxytol. Each session
consisted of an anatomical T1-weighted MP2RAGE
acquisition (TR/TI1/TI2/TE=5000/700/2500/2.5ms, 1mm³) and a 15-minute
whole-head 3D T2* multi-echo GRE acquisition (192×192×96mm FOV, 7
echoes, TR=2000s, TEs=4.88/9.76/14.64/19.52/24.40/29.28/34.16ms, 0.6mm³,
flip angle=17°) used for vascular segmentation. The T1 were processed
using FreeSurfer, and non-linearly registered to the MNI space to allow
projection of the RecoBundle white-matter bundle atlas [12], [13]. Vascular
segmentation was performed on the first echoe using an updated Braincharter
segmentation tool [14] as done previously [9] to obtain a “vesselness
score” defining the vessel tree, from which the centerline was computed by
morphology.
We developed a novel vascular tractography analysis by emulating
a multi-shell diffusion MRI acquisition (two shells, 30 directions each) by generating
a filterbank of 30 three-dimensional spatial kernels of two different cubic
grid sizes (7³ and 13³), each of which consisted of an oriented filter of a
particular antialiased and normalized directional vector. Thus, after convolution of the inverted "vesselness score" image (acting as b=0) with each of the 60 filters, a darker signal indicated a stronger diffusion in its corresponding direction. We then used DSI Studio [15], [16] to perform a using generalized q-sampling imaging (diffusion
sampling length ratio of 1.25) [16]. A deterministic fiber tracking algorithm [16] was used, using the vessel-tree centerline
as seed region, until 200,000 tracks were generated. The anisotropy and angular
threshold (15°–90°) were allowed to vary randomly, and the step size was set to
5 mm to bridge discontinuities in the vascular segmentation. The geometry of
the resulting fiber trajectories was smoothed by averaging the propagation
direction with 80% of the previous direction. Tracks with a length shorter than
200 mm or longer than 1000 mm were discarded. Finally, the tracts were used to
estimate a connectivity matrix between brain regions as defined by the WM atlas RecoBundle [12], [13] and the Freesurfer Destrieux2009 GM atlas.
Results
Figure 1 illustrates the segmented vessels in 3D, as well
as an example set of oriented filters used to convert the vesselness images
into images mimicking diffusion-weighted images. Figure 2 illustrates the
reconstructed tracts for one subject as well as its correspondence with the
vascular segmentation. Figure 3 shows the potential of the method by depicting
two connectome matrices computed using Freesurfer’s gray-matter parcellation
and RecoBundle’s white-matter bundles, respectively.Discussion and Conclusion
Here we have
quantified the large-scale geometry of the human brain vasculature by treating
the vessels as paths and mapping their connectivity between brain regions. It is evident that the vascular geometry varies across individuals [17], but the extent of this across-subject
variability
is still undetermined; hence it is possible that the vascular connectivity is more
consistent across individuals, which will be addressed with further work. Moreover, common assumptions that are valid in diffusion tractography
are not valid for our vascular data, such as the existence of branching and
sharp turns in the vasculature, and thus our model based on spherical harmonics has a greater potential of capturing the complex vascular
structures compared to tensor-based models [18].
Our vascular connectivity estimate
approach could help to address several open questions, such as quantifying the resemblance between white-matter vasculature and fiber bundles
we previously uncovered [9]. Also, our ongoing
work is seeking to compare vascular connectivity with functional connectivity
to characterize their interrelationship; while the
vasculature might impose structured patterns of physiological noise in the fMRI data, it has been recently suggested that the
large-scale angioarchitecture might reflect meaningful patterns in brain
organization[19], [20]. Acknowledgements
This
work was supported in part by the NIH NIBIB (grants P41-EB030006 and
R01-EB019437), NINDS (grant R21-NS106706), by the BRAIN Initiative (NIH NIMH grant R01-MH111419), and by the MGH/HST
Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging; and was made
possible by the resources provided by NIH Shared Instrumentation Grants
S10-RR023043 and S10-RR019371. We thank our colleagues at Siemens Heathineers
for use of the Works-In-Progress package #944References
[1] S. M. Kazan et
al., “Vascular autorescaling of fMRI (VasA fMRI) improves sensitivity of
population studies: A pilot study.,” Neuroimage, vol. 124, no. Pt A, pp.
794–805, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.033.
[2] N.
Vigneau-Roy, M. Bernier, M. Descoteaux, and K. Whittingstall, “Regional
variations in vascular density correlate with resting-state and task-evoked
blood oxygen level-dependent signal amplitude,” Hum. Brain Mapp., vol.
35, no. 5, pp. 1906–1920, 2014, doi: 10.1002/hbm.22301.
[3] S. Tak, J. R.
Polimeni, D. J. J. Wang, L. Yan, and J. J. Chen, “Associations of resting-state
fMRI functional connectivity with flow-BOLD coupling and regional vasculature.,”
Brain Connect., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 137–46, Apr. 2015, doi:
10.1089/brain.2014.0299.
[4] M. J. Brookes
et al., “Investigating the electrophysiological basis of resting state
networks using magnetoencephalography,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.,
vol. 108, no. 40, pp. 16783–16788, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1112685108.
[5] M. L. Schölvinck,
A. Maier, F. Q. Ye, J. H. Duyn, and D. A. Leopold, “Neural basis of global
resting-state fMRI activity,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., vol. 107,
no. 22, pp. 10238–10243, Jun. 2010, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913110107.
[6] Y. Ma et
al., “Resting-state hemodynamics are spatiotemporally coupled to
synchronized and symmetric neural activity in excitatory neurons,” Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., vol. 113, no. 52, pp. E8463–E8471, Dec. 2016,
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1525369113.
[7] Y. Tong and
B. de B. Frederick, “Tracking cerebral blood flow in BOLD fMRI using
recursively generated regressors,” Hum. Brain Mapp., vol. 35, no. 11,
pp. 5471–5485, Nov. 2014, doi: 10.1002/hbm.22564.
[8] K.-L. Nguyen et
al., “Multicenter Safety and Practice for Off-Label Diagnostic Use of
Ferumoxytol in MRI,” Radiology, p. 190477, Oct. 2019, doi:
10.1148/radiol.2019190477.
[9] M. Bernier et
al., “Human cerebral white-matter vasculature imaged using the blood-pool
contrast agent Ferumoxytol: bundle-specific vessels and vascular density,” Proc
Intl Soc Mag Reson Med, vol. 28, p. 0016, 2020.
[10] S. Cetin, A.
Demir, A. Yezzi, M. Degertekin, and G. Unal, “Vessel tractography using an
intensity based tensor model with branch detection,” IEEE Trans. Med.
Imaging, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 348–363, 2013, doi: 10.1109/TMI.2012.2227118.
[11] S. Cetin and
G. Unal, “A higher-order tensor vessel tractography for segmentation of
vascular structures,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 34, no. 10, pp.
2172–2185, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1109/TMI.2015.2425535.
[12] E.
Garyfallidis et al., “Recognition of white matter bundles using local
and global streamline-based registration and clustering,” Neuroimage,
vol. 170, pp. 283–295, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.015.
[13] S. Zhang and
K. Arfanakis, “Evaluation of standardized and study-specific diffusion tensor
imaging templates of the adult human brain: Template characteristics, spatial
normalization accuracy, and detection of small inter-group FA differences,” Neuroimage,
vol. 172, pp. 40–50, May 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.046.
[14] M. Bernier, S.
C. Cunnane, and K. Whittingstall, “The morphology of the human cerebrovascular
system,” Hum. Brain Mapp., vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 4962–4975, Dec. 2018,
doi: 10.1002/hbm.24337.
[15] F.-C. Yeh, T.
D. Verstynen, Y. Wang, J. C. Fernández-Miranda, and W.-Y. I. Tseng, “Deterministic
Diffusion Fiber Tracking Improved by Quantitative Anisotropy,” PLoS One,
vol. 8, no. 11, p. e80713, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080713.
[16] F. C. Yeh, V.
J. Wedeen, and W. Y. I. Tseng, “Generalized q-sampling imaging,” IEEE Trans.
Med. Imaging, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 1626–1635, Sep. 2010, doi:
10.1109/TMI.2010.2045126.
[17] M. Bernier, S.
C. Cunnane, and K. Whittingstall, “The morphology of the human cerebrovascular
system,” Hum. Brain Mapp., Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1002/hbm.24337.
[18] I. Aganj, C.
Lenglet, and G. Sapiro, “ODF maxima extraction in spherical harmonic
representation via analytical search space reduction,” in Lecture Notes in
Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence
and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2010, vol. 6362 LNCS, no. PART 2, pp.
84–91, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-15745-5_11.
[19] M. G. Bright,
J. R. Whittaker, I. D. Driver, and K. Murphy, “Vascular physiology drives
functional brain networks,” Neuroimage, vol. 217, Aug. 2020, doi:
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116907.
[20] J. E. Chen et
al., “Resting-state ‘physiological networks,’” Neuroimage, vol. 213,
Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116707.