Philip A Corrado1, Daniel Seiter1, Christopher J François2, Farhan Raza1, Kevin Johnson1, and Oliver Wieben1
1University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States, 2Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
Synopsis
We
used radial sampling, parallel imaging, and compressed sensing for real-time cardiac
MRI during exercise, comparing the performance of two temporal resolutions for
this approach in a numerical phantom and in a human volunteer. We found the
approach feasible with sufficient spatial and temporal resolution to capture
myocardial motion. While a longer temporal resolution with 30 radial spokes provides
better image quality during rest, shortening the temporal resolution by acquiring
just 20 spokes can improve results during exercise by better capturing rapid
motion such as late diastolic filling.
INTRODUCTION
Cardiac MRI (CMR) is a powerful tool for assessing
myocardial anatomy and function including volumes and myocardial motion1. CMR during exercise
in the bore to probe physiological responses to exercise stress in real time2 is of clinical
interest yet challenging due to subject motion, need for free-breathing acquisitions, and compromised ECG quality. ‘Realtime’ imaging instead
of cine is promising to address these challenges but requires
particularly high temporal resolution due to high heart rates, producing a
trade-off between temporal resolution, spatial resolution, and undersampling
artifact. Prior approaches have used parallel imaging2, non-cartesian
sampling3, and constrained
reconstructions4 to push the limits
of spatiotemporal resolution. However, the tradeoffs between temporal
resolution and undersampling artifact during exercise remain
under-investigated. In this pilot study, we employed radial undersampling, parallel imaging, and compressed sensing for real-time
CMR during exercise and analyzed the performance of this approach in a
numerical phantom and in a human volunteer.METHODS
A 2D
MRI sequence with balanced steady-state free procession (bSSFP) contrast and
tiny golden angle view ordering5 was used in a MRXCAT6 numerical phantom capable to simulate cardiac
and respiratory motion and in a 70-year-old volunteer from a study probing the
exercise response in pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients. The results of that PH
study are beyond the scope of this abstract, which focusses on MRI technical
development. The MRXCAT simulation used heart rates of 60 and 120 bpm and
respiratory rates of 12 and 24 bpm to simulate rest and exercise, respectively,
and 8 simulated coil channels. The volunteer was imaged on a 3T scanner (Discovery
MR750, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) with an 8-channel cardiac coil at rest and
during exercise with a pneumatic MRI-compatible exercise stepper (Cardio Step
Module; Ergospect, Innsbruck, Austria) with stepping resistance automatically
adjusted to maintain a target exercise power of 15W. 3,000 radial projections
were acquired continuously for each slice, with 326 samples per spoke and a
0.75 fractional echo: TR/TE/Dz=2.9 ms,1.1ms, 8mm. After binning projections
for real-time reconstructions with 20 and 30 spokes per frame (58 and 87 ms
temporal resolutions, repectively), images were reconstructed to a matrix of
160x160 for a spatial resolution of 2.25x2.25mm using parallel imaging and
compressed sensing (with temporal total variation and
spatial wavelet L1-norm penalties)
via the BART toolbox7, using coil sensitivity maps determined by
ESPIRiT8. The
penalty weights were λTV=0.001 and λwavelet=0.001 for the MRXCAT reconstructions and λTV=0.008
and λwavelet=0.007
for the volunteer reconstructions. MRXCAT reconstructions were compared against
the ground truth using root mean square error (RMSE), and the volunteer
reconstructions were compared visually against cine reconstructions of the same
data (20 frames, 75 spokes per frame after respiratory gating from bellows with
50% efficiency, reconstructed with same parameters as real-time
reconstructions).RESULTS
The sampling and reconstruction technique produced MRXCAT images with
minimal streaking artifact but with blurring, for both temporal resolutions
(Figures 1-2). RMSE was higher for the “exercise” simulation than the rest
simulation. RMSE was higher for 20-spoke images than for 30-spoke images at
rest, but similar for both temporal resolutions during exercise. The volunteer
only had a very slight increase in heart rate during exercise (65 vs. 62 bpm), due
to her being on a beta-blocker and to the modest exercise paradigm used as a
result of her age and disease. Volunteer images for real-time and cine
reconstruction are shown in Figures 3 and 4. Figure 5 plots the intensity along
a profile through the left ventricle (LV) at end diastole (ED) during exercise
for each of the reconstructions.DISCUSSION
We
evaluated the use of radial sampling and compressed sensing at 2 temporal
resolutions for real-time exercise CMR in the MRXCAT numerical phantom and a
volunteer. This approached generated images with acceptable image quality at
both temporal resolutions. The 30-spoke
reconstructions resulted in images with lower RMSE in the MRXCAT phantom at
“rest”, as increased data reduced undersampling artifact. At “exercise”,
however, RMSE was higher in the 30-spoke ED image, but lower in the end systole
(ES) image. This likely results from the rapid motion of late diastolic filling
which caused intraframe motion-induced blurring, particularly in the 30-spoke
reconstruction with a longer temporal resolution. Similar performance was seen in
both temporal resolutions in the volunteer, likely because the volunteer’s
beta-blocking medication prevented a large heart rate increase in response to
exercise, so both temporal resolutions were sufficient to capture the
myocardial motion. However, image quality was worse in both real-time exercise images than the corresponding rest images, perhaps due to increased myocardial contractility or bulk motion. The profile through the LV highlights possible marginal
benefits of a shorter temporal resolution, with a slightly better match to the
cine reconstruction for the 20-spoke vs. 30-spoke image. A limitation is
the low HR during exercise of the volunteer. Future work should test this
technique in subjects capable to exercise at higher workloads to test the
approach at increased heart rates.CONCLUSIONS
Real-time
exercise CMR is feasible with radial sampling and compressed sensing at
sufficient spatial and temporal resolution to capture myocardial motion. While
a longer temporal resolution provides better image quality during rest,
shortening the temporal resolution can improve results during exercise by
better capturing rapid motion.Acknowledgements
Philip A Corrado is supported by the National
Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute of the NIH under Award Number F31HL144020. The
content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily
represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. We
gratefully thank GE Healthcare for MRI research support.References
1. Nagel
E, van Rossum AC, Fleck E. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Steinkopff; 2013.
2. La Gerche A, Claessen G,
Van De Bruaene A, Pattyn N, Van Cleemput J, Gewillig M, Bogaert J, Dymarkowski
S, Claus P, Heidbuchel H. Cardiac MRI: A new gold standard for ventricular
volume quantification during high-intensity exercise. Circ Cardiovasc
Imaging. 2013;6:329–338. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.980037
3. Feng X, Salerno M, Kramer
CM, Meyer CH. Non-Cartesian balanced steady-state free precession pulse
sequences for real-time cardiac MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2016;75:1546–1555.
doi: 10.1002/mrm.25738
4. Zhao B, Haldar JP, Brinegar
C, Liang Z-PP. Low rank matrix recovery for real-time cardiac MRI. 2010 7th
IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging From Nano to Macro, ISBI 2010 - Proc.
2010;996–999. doi: 10.1109/ISBI.2010.5490156
5. Wundrak S, Paul J, Ulrici
J, Hell E, Rasche V. A small surrogate for the golden angle in time-resolved
radial MRI based on generalized fibonacci sequences. IEEE Trans Med Imaging.
2015;34:1262–1269. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2014.2382572
6. Wissmann L, Santelli C,
Segars WP, Kozerke S. MRXCAT: Realistic numerical phantoms for cardiovascular
magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014;16:1–11. doi:
10.1186/s12968-014-0063-3
7. Uecker M, Tamir JI, Ong F,
Lustig M. The BART Toolbox for Computational Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Ismrm.
2016;
8. Uecker M, Lai P, Murphy MJ,
Virtue P, Elad M, Pauly JM, Vasanawala SS, Lustig M. ESPIRiT--An eigenvalue
approach to autocalibrating parallel MRI: Where SENSE meets GRAPPA. Magn
Reson Med. 2014;71. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24751